Skip to content

GHSA-5w7r-f4cg-rqq7 CVE-2026-72799 GO-2026-6412

SiYuan: Missing publish-access filter on the HPath/path-resolution endpoints discloses the private document tree to anonymous readers

Medium Go
Severity
6.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.33%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 25.58% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
0.0.0-20260724112156-5bae0926b896
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72799.

Summary

Five filetree endpoints resolve arbitrary document IDs and paths with no publish-access check of any kind. All are CheckAuth-only, so they are reachable by the publish RoleReader token and by the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false. An anonymous reader can map the complete private document tree every notebook, folder, and document title, and which notebook holds each document for documents marked hidden, password-protected, or publish-forbidden, and can resolve titles to document IDs.

Details

None of the following handlers invokes IsReadOnlyRoleContext, CheckBlockIdAccessableByPublishAccess, or CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore:

Endpoint Returns Discloses
getFullHPathByID (router 159) GetFullHPathByID(id) full title path including notebook, e.g. /MySecretNotebook/Confidential/Q3 Layoffs Plan
getHPathByID (router 157) GetHPathByID(id) document-relative title path
getPathByID (router 158) {path, notebook} which notebook a document lives in, plus its .sy storage path
getIDsByHPath (router 160) GetIDsByHPath(path, notebook) title-path → document-ID enumeration
getHPathByPath (router 155) HPath from a storage path title path from a storage path

Each accepts an arbitrary ID or HPath and resolves it identically for hidden, publish-forbidden, and password-protected documents.

This enables two operations for an unauthenticated caller:

  1. Map the private document tree: getFullHPathByID and getPathByID yield every notebook/folder/document title and its containing notebook.
  2. Resolve titles to IDs: getIDsByHPath converts a known or guessed title path into document IDs, which are the required input for other block-read endpoints.

Document titles and HPaths are precisely the block metadata that the project's block-metadata restriction (commit ffde3b21e) set out to protect; that change gated getBlockInfo, getDocInfo, and getDocsInfo but left this entire path-resolution family open.

Guarded-sibling asymmetry. getRecentDocs (FilterRecentDocsByPublishAccess), getCriteria (FilterCriteriaByPublishAccess), and getLocalStorage (FilterLocalStorageByPublishAccess) all filter document references for reader sessions. The codebase clearly publish-scopes reader-visible metadata elsewhere; these five endpoints do not.

Verified at origin/master (eef105683): all five handler bodies contain no publish-access call; the storage-family siblings contain their filters; all five routes are registered CheckAuth without CheckAdminRole.

Proof of Concept

Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account. A document exists in a notebook marked publish-forbidden or password-protected.

Resolve a private document's full title path:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/filetree/getFullHPathByID
{"id":"<DOC_ID>"}
→ /MySecretNotebook/Confidential/Q3 Layoffs Plan

Identify its notebook and storage path:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/filetree/getPathByID
{"id":"<DOC_ID>"}
→ {"path":"/....sy","notebook":"<BOX_ID>"}

Enumerate IDs from a title path:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/filetree/getIDsByHPath
{"path":"/Confidential","notebook":"<BOX_ID>"}
→ document IDs under a folder the reader cannot otherwise access

Each returns data for documents excluded from publishing; no password or membership is required.

Impact

An anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish RoleReader can enumerate the complete private document structure: notebook names, folder hierarchy, and document titles for content the administrator marked hidden, password-protected, or excluded from publishing. Document titles alone are frequently sensitive (project names, personnel actions, client identifiers). The ID-resolution direction additionally supplies valid document IDs, removing the "attacker must know an ID" precondition for other block-read endpoints. Confidentiality-only.

Suggested fix

For IsReadOnlyRoleContext sessions, gate each of the five handlers with CheckBlockIdAccessableByPublishAccess (or restrict resolution to publish-visible documents), mirroring the treatment already applied in getRecentDocs, getCriteria, and getLocalStorage.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260724112156-5bae0926b896
0.0.0-20260724112156-5bae0926b896

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260724112156-5bae0926b896

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260724112156-5bae0926b896 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 6.9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 5.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor