Skip to content

GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9 CVE-2026-72800 GO-2026-6395

SiYuan: Missing publish-access filter on getAttributeViewKeysByID discloses database column schema, plus two unscoped block-ID enumeration oracles (publish mode)

Medium Go
Severity
6.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.33%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 25.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
0.0.0-20260724103335-f36331956ae9
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72800.

Summary

POST /api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID returns a database's full column schema with no publish-access filtering, while its sibling getAttributeViewKeys applies the filter for reader sessions. Two further endpoints, getBlockDefIDsByRefText and getBlockRelevantIDs return workspace-wide block IDs with no publish scoping. All three are CheckAuth-only, so they are reachable by the publish RoleReader token and by the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false.

Details

(a) getAttributeViewKeysByID: ungated column-schema disclosure

The entire handler (kernel/api/av.go, router line 548):

ret.Data = model.GetAttributeViewKeysByID(avID, keyIDs...)   // no publish gate

With an empty keyIDs, GetAttributeViewKeysByID calls av.ParseAttributeView(avID) and returns every column's *av.Key:

Field Discloses
Name, Desc column title and user-authored description
Options the full single/multi-select vocabulary and colours (e.g. status labels such as "Fired", "Confidential")
Template the column's Sprig template expression — logic and field references
Relation the target avID, allowing pivot to another database
Rollup, NumberFormat, date config further schema

Guarded-sibling asymmetry, same file: getAttributeViewKeys (router line 526) runs FilterBlockAttributeViewKeysByPublishAccess(...) when IsReadOnlyRoleContext. getAttributeViewKeysByID applies nothing. A reader who knows an avID — trivially harvested from the data-av-id attribute of any published document embedding a database obtains the schema of any database in the workspace, including those whose host documents are hidden, password-protected, or publish-forbidden. Relation targets allow walking to sibling databases.

(b) Two unscoped block-ID enumeration oracles

Both CheckAuth-only with no publish gate. Neither returns content of its own, but both yield valid block IDs that other endpoints turn into content:

  • getBlockDefIDsByRefText (router line 237) → GetBlockDefIDsByRefText(anchor) returns the block IDs, workspace-wide and including private documents, whose reference/anchor text equals a caller-supplied string: a ref-text → ID oracle.
  • getBlockRelevantIDs (router line 274) → GetBlockRelevantIDsInBox(id, <notebook from request>) returns parent/previous/next block IDs and traverses decrypted encrypted-notebook structure while the notebook is unlocked, a tree-walk oracle.

Verified at origin/master (eef105683): all three handler bodies contain no publish-access, publish-ignore, or readonly-role check; all three routes are registered CheckAuth without CheckAdminRole.

Proof of Concept

Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account. A database exists whose host document is publish-forbidden or password-protected.

(a) Column schema of any database:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/av/getAttributeViewKeysByID
{"avID":"<AV_ID>"}

Returns every column's key object names, descriptions, select vocabularies, template expressions, and Relation target avIDs for a database whose host document the reader may not access.

Control: the sibling getAttributeViewKeys with the same avID returns filtered results for the same reader session, confirming the boundary is enforced there and omitted here.

(b) ID oracles:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/block/getBlockDefIDsByRefText
{"anchor":"<known ref text>"}
→ block IDs workspace-wide, including blocks in private documents

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/block/getBlockRelevantIDs
{"id":"<BLOCK_ID>","notebook":"<BOX_ID>"}
→ parent/previous/next block IDs; traverses encrypted-notebook structure when unlocked

Impact

An anonymous reader (publish mode with auth disabled) or any publish RoleReader can read the complete column schema of any database in the workspace, including column descriptions, select-option vocabularies (which frequently encode sensitive category labels), template logic, and relation targets that permit pivoting to further databases regardless of whether the host document is hidden, password-protected, or excluded from publishing.

The two enumeration endpoints additionally supply valid block IDs across the publish boundary, including from encrypted notebooks while unlocked. This removes the "attacker must already know a valid ID" precondition from other block-read endpoints, converting ID knowledge into content disclosure. Confidentiality-only.

Note

getAttributeViewKeysByID is a distinct handler from getAttributeView; although column definitions also appear within the latter's response payload, a fix applied to one handler does not remediate the other, and getAttributeViewKeysByID has its own filtered sibling (getAttributeViewKeys) demonstrating the intended treatment.

Suggested fix

  • Gate getAttributeViewKeysByID with FilterBlockAttributeViewKeysByPublishAccess, mirroring getAttributeViewKeys.
  • Scope getBlockDefIDsByRefText and getBlockRelevantIDs to publish-accessible blocks for reader sessions, and ensure the *InBox traversal path applies the same check before walking encrypted-notebook structure.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260724103335-f36331956ae9
0.0.0-20260724103335-f36331956ae9

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260724103335-f36331956ae9

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260724103335-f36331956ae9 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 6.9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 5.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor