Skip to content

GHSA-4x6r-9v57-3gqw CVE-2026-47406 PYSEC-2026-2928

praisonai-platform: IDOR in dependency endpoints allows cross-workspace issue linking, reading, and deletion due to missing ownership checks

High PyPI
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.41%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 35.54% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
0.1.4
Upgrade praisonai-platform to this version or later

Description

Summary

Type: Insecure Direct Object Reference. The dependency endpoints (POST/GET /workspaces/{workspace_id}/issues/{issue_id}/dependencies and DELETE .../dependencies/{dep_id}) gate access on require_workspace_member(workspace_id) only, then dispatch to DependencyService calls that take URL/body-supplied issue and dependency IDs without verifying any of them belong to the membership-checked workspace. Most damaging: create_dependency accepts body.depends_on_issue_id from the request body — that ID is checked against nothing — letting an attacker create a "blocks" or "related" link between any two issues anywhere in the database. File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/dependencies.py, lines 22-58; services/dependency_service.py, lines 26-65. Root cause: the same Depends(require_workspace_member) default-min-role pattern as the companion IDORs, plus a service layer (DependencyService) where every method takes raw IDs and queries them directly. create(issue_id, depends_on_issue_id, ...) writes a row with no workspace verification on either ID. list_for_issue(issue_id) returns dependencies in either direction. delete(dep_id) is a primary-key delete with no workspace predicate.

Affected Code

File 1: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/dependencies.py, lines 22-58.

@router.post("/", response_model=DependencyResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def create_dependency(
    workspace_id: str,
    issue_id: str,
    body: DependencyCreate,
    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
    session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
    svc = DependencyService(session)
    dep = await svc.create(issue_id, body.depends_on_issue_id, body.type)  # <-- BUG: neither id is workspace-checked
    return DependencyResponse.model_validate(dep)


@router.get("/", response_model=List[DependencyResponse])
async def list_dependencies(
    workspace_id: str,
    issue_id: str,
    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
    session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
    svc = DependencyService(session)
    deps = await svc.list_for_issue(issue_id)                              # <-- BUG: returns dependencies for any issue
    return [DependencyResponse.model_validate(d) for d in deps]


@router.delete("/{dep_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_dependency(
    workspace_id: str,
    issue_id: str,
    dep_id: str,
    user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
    session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
    svc = DependencyService(session)
    deleted = await svc.delete(dep_id)                                     # <-- BUG: deletes any dependency by id
    if not deleted:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Dependency not found")

File 2: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/dependency_service.py, lines 26-65.

async def create(self, issue_id: str, depends_on_issue_id: str, dep_type: str = "blocks") -> IssueDependency:
    if dep_type not in VALID_TYPES:
        raise ValueError(...)
    dep = IssueDependency(
        issue_id=issue_id,                                              # <-- accepts any
        depends_on_issue_id=depends_on_issue_id,                        # <-- accepts any (from request body)
        type=dep_type,
    )
    self._session.add(dep); await self._session.flush(); return dep

async def list_for_issue(self, issue_id: str) -> list[IssueDependency]:
    stmt = select(IssueDependency).where(
        (IssueDependency.issue_id == issue_id) | (IssueDependency.depends_on_issue_id == issue_id)
    )
    return list((await self._session.execute(stmt)).scalars().all())

async def delete(self, dep_id: str) -> bool:
    dep = await self.get(dep_id)                                        # session.get(IssueDependency, dep_id) — no workspace check
    ...

Why it's wrong: the request-body depends_on_issue_id is the worst part: an attacker can link any two issues across any two workspaces, polluting both workspaces' dependency graphs with attacker-chosen relationships ("blocks", "blocked_by", "related"). The triagers in the foreign workspace see their issue suddenly blocked by an unrelated foreign issue, breaking sprint planning and creating false correlation. The delete(dep_id) path lets an attacker remove legitimate cross-issue links between any two foreign workspaces, also disrupting their planning. The list_for_issue path leaks the dependency graph for any issue in the deployment.

Exploit Chain

  1. Attacker is a member of workspace W_attacker and harvests two foreign-workspace issue UUIDs I1 (in W_target1) and I2 (in W_target2). They leak via the activity feed, comment threads, error messages, exported dumps, the agent prompt history, or any other channel that ever serialises an issue ID. State: attacker holds two foreign issue UUIDs.
  2. Attacker sends POST /workspaces/W_attacker/issues/I1/dependencies with Authorization: Bearer <attacker_jwt> and body {"depends_on_issue_id": "I2", "type": "blocks"}. State: control flow enters create_dependency with issue_id=I1 (foreign), depends_on_issue_id=I2 (foreign).
  3. require_workspace_member(W_attacker, attacker) passes (attacker is a member of W_attacker). DependencyService.create(I1, I2, "blocks") writes a new row IssueDependency(issue_id=I1, depends_on_issue_id=I2, type="blocks"). State: there is now a cross-workspace dependency between two foreign issues, written by the attacker.
  4. The triage UIs of W_target1 and W_target2 now show that the foreign issue is blocked by an unrelated issue in another workspace. Workflow rules that key off "cannot close while blocked" will refuse to let the legitimate triagers close I1. State: foreign workflow disrupted.
  5. Attacker repeats with GET /workspaces/W_attacker/issues/I1/dependencies to read the dependency graph for any foreign issue (information disclosure, project relationship mapping), or with DELETE .../{dep_id} (after enumerating dep_ids via the list call) to strip legitimate dependencies between foreign issues, breaking blocked-by chains.
  6. Final state: with one workspace-member token, the attacker reads, writes, and deletes dependencies on every issue in the multi-tenant deployment, polluting the dependency graphs of foreign workspaces.

Security Impact

Severity: sec-high. CVSS 7.6: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged, high confidentiality (cross-workspace dependency graph disclosure), high integrity (cross-workspace dependency injection and deletion), no availability claim (workflow disruption is integrity, not availability). Attacker capability: read any issue's dependency graph; create arbitrary "blocks" / "blocked_by" / "related" links between any two issues across any two workspaces; delete any dependency by id. The most surprising primitive is the cross-workspace LINKING — the only one of the IDORs in this codebase where a single attacker request can affect TWO foreign workspaces at once. Preconditions: praisonai-platform is deployed multi-tenant; attacker has any membership token; foreign issue UUIDs are reachable. Differential: source-inspection-verified end-to-end. The asymmetry between this service (no workspace predicate anywhere) and MemberService.get(workspace_id, user_id) (correctly composite-keyed) confirms the gap. With the suggested fix below, the route would resolve both the URL issue_id and the body depends_on_issue_id against IssueService.get(workspace_id, ...) before allowing the dependency to be written.

Suggested Fix

Resolve every issue id (URL and body) against workspace_id at the route layer before dispatching. The route helper from the issue-IDOR companion advisory can be reused.

--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/dependencies.py
+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/dependencies.py
@@ -22,11 +22,16 @@
 @router.post("/", response_model=DependencyResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
 async def create_dependency(
     workspace_id: str,
     issue_id: str,
     body: DependencyCreate,
     user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
     session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
 ):
+    issue_svc = IssueService(session)
+    if await issue_svc.get(workspace_id, issue_id) is None:
+        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Issue not found")
+    if await issue_svc.get(workspace_id, body.depends_on_issue_id) is None:
+        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="depends_on_issue_id not found in this workspace")
     svc = DependencyService(session)
     dep = await svc.create(issue_id, body.depends_on_issue_id, body.type)
     return DependencyResponse.model_validate(dep)

Apply the same issue_svc.get(workspace_id, issue_id) precondition to list_dependencies and delete_dependency (verifying both the issue and the dependency belong to workspace_id).

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
praisonai-platform
< 0.1.4
0.1.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

praisonai-platform PyPI → 0.1.4

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai-platform>=0.1.4"
poetry
poetry add "praisonai-platform>=0.1.4"
uv
uv add "praisonai-platform>=0.1.4"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xxgv-vgvj-qvxh
PraisonAI: Platform members can rewrite shared labels and owner issue labels without owner/admin authorization
High Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-c78w-2q4r-68r7
PraisonAI: Platform member PATCH routes allow owner resource rewrites and project lead reassignment delete bypass
High Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-mxmx-rh57-jx58
PraisonAI: Platform members can delete owner issue dependencies through member-owned related issues
High Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-2fjj-qqg8-fg7x
praisonai-platform: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Medium Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-cwj8-7gp2-ggcw
praisonai-platform: default JWT signing secret 'dev-secret-change-me' enables token forgery
Critical Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-f38v-77qj-h4jq
praisonai-platform 0.1.4 still boots on the hardcoded JWT secret dev-secret-change-me (default-open production guard)
Critical Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-rh39-9c67-59mh
PraisonAI: Missing ownership check on DELETE endpoints allows members to delete others' content in Platform API
High Also affects praisonai-platform
GHSA-7p8g-6c6g-h9w7
praisonai-platform: Agent endpoints accept any agent_id without workspace ownership check, cross-workspace read/update/delete IDOR
High Also affects praisonai-platform
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor