GHSA-4q6h-8p4v-67vq CVE-2026-48153
Budibase: SSRF via OAuth2 token endpoint URL reaches internal hosts and cloud metadata
- Severity
- 8.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.18%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 6.93% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Fix
3.39.0- Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later
Description
Summary
fetchToken in the OAuth2 SDK makes a POST to a builder-supplied URL with plain node-fetch, skipping the blacklist.isBlacklisted check that every other outbound fetch path in the codebase uses. The Joi schema for the OAuth2 URL has no scheme or host restriction. Alice, a builder, points an OAuth2 config at http://169.254.169.254/... or http://127.0.0.1:5984/; the server connects and returns response-body fragments in the validation result.
Details
packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/oauth2/utils.ts:17-65 defines fetchToken. Near the end:
const resp = await fetch(config.url, fetchConfig)
config.url is whatever the builder stored. fetchConfig has redirect: "follow" (the default), so a public URL that returns 302 to an internal target is also reachable.
The route validation at packages/server/src/api/routes/oauth2.ts:9 accepts any string:
url: Joi.string().required(),
The controller passes the URL into fetchToken through crud.ts. The /api/oauth2/validate endpoint (builder role) is the most direct attack path: it lives on builderRoutes, takes the URL from the body, fires the fetch, and returns a validation envelope that includes the upstream error string.
Compare with every other outbound fetch in the codebase:
packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts:754callsblacklist.isBlacklisted(url)before its fetch (though it does not re-check redirects; see companion advisory for REST-redirect SSRF).packages/backend-core/src/utils/outboundFetch.ts:98-100setsredirect: "manual"and re-validates each hop.packages/server/src/automations/steps/outgoingWebhook.tsroutes throughfetchWithBlacklist.
The default blacklist blocks 127.0.0.0/8, 169.254.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16 (packages/backend-core/src/blacklist/blacklist.ts:6-16). The OAuth2 path never consults it.
Proof of Concept
Tested against Budibase 3.35.8 (built from master at f960e361).
Step 1: Alice, a builder, POSTs an OAuth2 config pointed at CouchDB on the same host as Budibase:
curl -sS -b "$BUILDER_COOKIE" -X POST "$BASE/api/oauth2/validate" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url":"http://127.0.0.1:5984/","clientId":"t","clientSecret":"t",
"method":"BODY","grantType":"client_credentials"}'
Server response:
{"valid":false,"message":"Method Not Allowed"}
Budibase reached CouchDB (which rejects POST at / with 405). Without the blacklist bypass this request would be blocked at the IP check.
Step 2: Probe the cloud metadata range:
curl -sS -b "$BUILDER_COOKIE" -X POST "$BASE/api/oauth2/validate" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/","clientId":"t","clientSecret":"t","method":"BODY","grantType":"client_credentials"}'
Server response:
{"valid":false,"message":"invalid json response body at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ reason: Unexpected token 'N', \"Not Found\" is not valid JSON"}
The "Not Found" substring is the upstream body; the server reached the link-local metadata endpoint and leaked the first bytes of the response into the validation error.
Impact
Two concrete paths, both reachable from any builder account (free-tier signup on Budibase Cloud is enough):
- Cross-tenant data read on Cloud. Budibase Cloud multi-tenants on a shared CouchDB; each tenant gets its own
<tenantId>_global-dbandapp_<id>databases on the same port 5984. The blacklist is what keeps a builder from talking to CouchDB directly. With that bypassed, Alice canGET http://127.0.0.1:5984/_all_dbsvia a 302 redirector and enumerate every other tenant's databases, then read their_users, app definitions, and datasource configs (which include third-party credentials). None of this traffic goes through Budibase's tenant isolation layer, so standard app-level access controls do not apply. - IAM credential exfiltration. Alice points the URL at
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>/and receives the instance role credentials in the validation error path. Those credentials carry whatever AWS permissions the Budibase instance role holds.
Self-hosted deployments face the same CouchDB/Redis/MinIO access plus any other service reachable on the host or pod network. The blacklist was explicitly added to prevent exactly this, and every other outbound fetch path uses it.
Recommended Fix
Call blacklist.isBlacklisted before the fetch and set redirect: "manual" on fetchConfig, matching the pattern in outboundFetch.ts:
import { blacklist } from "@budibase/backend-core"
async function fetchToken(config: { url: string; /* ... */ }) {
config = await processEnvironmentVariable(config)
if (await blacklist.isBlacklisted(config.url)) {
throw new Error("OAuth2 token URL is blocked.")
}
const fetchConfig: RequestInit = {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" },
body: new URLSearchParams({ grant_type: "client_credentials" }),
redirect: "manual",
}
// ...
}
Alternatively, replace the fetch call with fetchWithBlacklist, which handles both checks and re-validates redirect targets.
Found by aisafe.io
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @budibase/server | < 3.39.0 |
3.39.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@budibase/server npm → 3.39.0
- npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.0- yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.0- pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url` | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7 Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7 Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435 Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF) | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2 Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor