GHSA-3gp5-q4jw-3v94 CVE-2026-48152
Budibase: Basic app users can exfiltrate stored REST datasource auth by rewriting datasource base URL
- Severity
- 8.1 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.26%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 17.38% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
3.39.0- Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later
Description
Summary
Budibase stores external REST datasource credentials server-side and documents that database credentials are applied server-side and are not exposed in the UI. The REST datasource implementation redacts stored Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 auth secrets before returning datasource data to clients. However, the single-datasource GET and PUT routes are guarded by generic TABLE READ, not by Builder/Admin permission or datasource-specific ownership/resource checks.
The built-in Basic app user role maps to the WRITE permission set, which includes table read/write and query write. A Basic user can therefore read an existing REST datasource, receive redacted authConfigs values, submit an update that changes only config.url while keeping the redacted placeholders, and trigger an existing saved relative-path REST query. During update, mergeConfigs() restores the old stored secret when it sees the redaction placeholder. During query execution, Budibase prefixes the attacker-controlled datasource config.url to the relative query path and applies the resolved stored auth headers. The result is server-side disclosure of the builder-configured REST Authorization secret to an attacker-controlled listener.
Source evidence
packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: datasource list/create/delete routes are onbuilderRoutes, butGET /api/datasources/:datasourceIdandPUT /api/datasources/:datasourceIdare inauthorizedRoutesguarded only byPermissionType.TABLEandPermissionLevel.READ.packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: the:datasourceIdroutes do not attach datasource-specific resource authorization.packages/backend-core/src/security/roles.ts: built-in Basic user maps toBuiltinPermissionID.WRITE.packages/backend-core/src/security/permissions.ts:WRITEgrantsREAD/EXECUTElevels and includesQUERY WRITEandTABLE WRITE.packages/server/src/api/controllers/datasource.ts:datasourceController.updatereads the stored datasource, mergesctx.request.bodyinto it, writes the result back, and returns a redacted copy.packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts:removeSecrets()redacts REST Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 secrets toPASSWORD_REPLACEMENT.packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts:mergeConfigs()restores the old stored auth-secret field when the update body sends the redaction placeholder for the same auth config.packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: relative REST query paths are prefixed with datasourceconfig.url.packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: REST execution resolves the selected auth config and applies the resulting auth headers to the outbound request.packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts: saved query executionPOST /api/v2/queries/:queryIdis guarded byQUERY WRITE, which the Basic role has through theWRITEpermission set.
Reproduction outline
No production systems were tested. This is source-backed and has a local static verifier plus a proof helper for an already-running authorized instance.
- Deploy a current Budibase instance.
- As a builder/admin, create and publish an app.
- As the builder/admin, create a REST datasource with:
config.urlset to a benign legitimate API base URL.- a stored REST auth config containing a sentinel secret, such as a Bearer token
BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL.
- As the builder/admin, create a saved REST query that uses a relative path and that auth config.
- Add a non-builder Basic app user.
- As the Basic user, confirm negative controls:
- Builder-only datasource list/create/preview routes are denied.
- The user is not a builder/admin.
- As the Basic user, call
GET /api/datasources/{datasourceId}. The response returns the datasource and redacted auth placeholders, not the raw secret. - As the Basic user, call
PUT /api/datasources/{datasourceId}with the same redacted datasource body but withconfig.urlchanged to an attacker-controlled HTTP listener. - As the Basic user, execute the saved query with
POST /api/v2/queries/{queryId}. - Expected vulnerable result: the attacker listener receives the server-side REST request with the preserved stored Authorization material, even though the Basic user never knew the raw secret and should not be able to administer datasource credentials.
Local source verifier:
python3 docker-proofs/s60/verify_budibase_basic_user_datasource_source_path.py
Expected success line:
SOURCE_PATH_VERIFIED budibase_basic_user_datasource_rest_secret_exfil
Observed May 1, 2026:
origin/masterwas8e6bf89acf1f602f3334592c4c8cd14e79f5362a.- Latest release was
3.37.2from Apr 30, 2026. - The source verifier passed and confirmed the route, role, redaction, merge, URL-prefixing, auth-header, and saved-query execution conditions.
Proof-assist helper:
python3 docker-proofs/s60/proof_budibase_basic_user_datasource_update_rest_secret_exfil.py \
--base-url http://127.0.0.1:10000 \
--app-id <published-app-id> \
--datasource-id <rest-datasource-id> \
--query-id <saved-relative-rest-query-id> \
--cookie '<basic-user-session-cookie>' \
--expected-secret BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL
The helper does not start, stop, or delete containers/resources. It targets an authorized already-running instance, rewrites only config.url, captures the outbound Authorization material, and restores the original datasource by default.
Impact
This breaks the intended application-user versus builder/admin boundary for external REST datasource credentials. A Basic app user should be able to use published app functionality, but should not be able to administer datasource connection settings or extract builder-configured REST auth secrets. In a realistic internal-tool deployment, REST datasource auth configs often contain bearer tokens, API keys, Basic credentials, OAuth client secrets, service account tokens, or integration credentials for ticketing, CRM, ERP, security, and operational systems.
An attacker with only Basic app-user access to an app that uses an authenticated REST datasource can redirect future query traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint and collect the preserved server-side Authorization header. This is distinct from public REST datasource SSRF issues because the core impact is stored credential disclosure across the role boundary, and it works with an external attacker-controlled URL rather than depending on internal-network reachability.
Remediation ideas
- Move
GET/PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceIdbehind Builder/Admin datasource permissions, or add datasource-specific resource authorization. - Do not allow non-builder app users to update datasource
config,authConfigs, base URL, default headers, or plugin connection settings. - Split non-sensitive datasource metadata reads from credential-bearing/admin datasource reads.
- Treat redaction placeholders as valid only in trusted builder/admin update flows.
- Consider rotating REST datasource auth secrets for affected deployments after patching.
Duplicate/nearby public issue notes
Public triage found known Budibase REST datasource SSRF and protected-endpoint auth-bypass CVEs, but no obvious public duplicate for this specific Basic app-user PUT /api/datasources/:id role-boundary issue combined with preserved REST authConfigs secret exfiltration through a changed datasource base URL.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @budibase/server | < 3.39.0 |
3.39.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@budibase/server npm → 3.39.0
- npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.0- yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.0- pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url` | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7 Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7 Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435 Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF) | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2 Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor