Skip to content

GHSA-3gp5-q4jw-3v94 CVE-2026-48152

Budibase: Basic app users can exfiltrate stored REST datasource auth by rewriting datasource base URL

High npm
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.26%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 17.38% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
3.39.0
Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later

Description

Summary

Budibase stores external REST datasource credentials server-side and documents that database credentials are applied server-side and are not exposed in the UI. The REST datasource implementation redacts stored Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 auth secrets before returning datasource data to clients. However, the single-datasource GET and PUT routes are guarded by generic TABLE READ, not by Builder/Admin permission or datasource-specific ownership/resource checks.

The built-in Basic app user role maps to the WRITE permission set, which includes table read/write and query write. A Basic user can therefore read an existing REST datasource, receive redacted authConfigs values, submit an update that changes only config.url while keeping the redacted placeholders, and trigger an existing saved relative-path REST query. During update, mergeConfigs() restores the old stored secret when it sees the redaction placeholder. During query execution, Budibase prefixes the attacker-controlled datasource config.url to the relative query path and applies the resolved stored auth headers. The result is server-side disclosure of the builder-configured REST Authorization secret to an attacker-controlled listener.

Source evidence

  • packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: datasource list/create/delete routes are on builderRoutes, but GET /api/datasources/:datasourceId and PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceId are in authorizedRoutes guarded only by PermissionType.TABLE and PermissionLevel.READ.
  • packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: the :datasourceId routes do not attach datasource-specific resource authorization.
  • packages/backend-core/src/security/roles.ts: built-in Basic user maps to BuiltinPermissionID.WRITE.
  • packages/backend-core/src/security/permissions.ts: WRITE grants READ/EXECUTE levels and includes QUERY WRITE and TABLE WRITE.
  • packages/server/src/api/controllers/datasource.ts: datasourceController.update reads the stored datasource, merges ctx.request.body into it, writes the result back, and returns a redacted copy.
  • packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts: removeSecrets() redacts REST Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 secrets to PASSWORD_REPLACEMENT.
  • packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts: mergeConfigs() restores the old stored auth-secret field when the update body sends the redaction placeholder for the same auth config.
  • packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: relative REST query paths are prefixed with datasource config.url.
  • packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: REST execution resolves the selected auth config and applies the resulting auth headers to the outbound request.
  • packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts: saved query execution POST /api/v2/queries/:queryId is guarded by QUERY WRITE, which the Basic role has through the WRITE permission set.

Reproduction outline

No production systems were tested. This is source-backed and has a local static verifier plus a proof helper for an already-running authorized instance.

  1. Deploy a current Budibase instance.
  2. As a builder/admin, create and publish an app.
  3. As the builder/admin, create a REST datasource with:
    • config.url set to a benign legitimate API base URL.
    • a stored REST auth config containing a sentinel secret, such as a Bearer token BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL.
  4. As the builder/admin, create a saved REST query that uses a relative path and that auth config.
  5. Add a non-builder Basic app user.
  6. As the Basic user, confirm negative controls:
    • Builder-only datasource list/create/preview routes are denied.
    • The user is not a builder/admin.
  7. As the Basic user, call GET /api/datasources/{datasourceId}. The response returns the datasource and redacted auth placeholders, not the raw secret.
  8. As the Basic user, call PUT /api/datasources/{datasourceId} with the same redacted datasource body but with config.url changed to an attacker-controlled HTTP listener.
  9. As the Basic user, execute the saved query with POST /api/v2/queries/{queryId}.
  10. Expected vulnerable result: the attacker listener receives the server-side REST request with the preserved stored Authorization material, even though the Basic user never knew the raw secret and should not be able to administer datasource credentials.

Local source verifier:

python3 docker-proofs/s60/verify_budibase_basic_user_datasource_source_path.py

Expected success line:

SOURCE_PATH_VERIFIED budibase_basic_user_datasource_rest_secret_exfil

Observed May 1, 2026:

  • origin/master was 8e6bf89acf1f602f3334592c4c8cd14e79f5362a.
  • Latest release was 3.37.2 from Apr 30, 2026.
  • The source verifier passed and confirmed the route, role, redaction, merge, URL-prefixing, auth-header, and saved-query execution conditions.

Proof-assist helper:

python3 docker-proofs/s60/proof_budibase_basic_user_datasource_update_rest_secret_exfil.py \
  --base-url http://127.0.0.1:10000 \
  --app-id <published-app-id> \
  --datasource-id <rest-datasource-id> \
  --query-id <saved-relative-rest-query-id> \
  --cookie '<basic-user-session-cookie>' \
  --expected-secret BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL

The helper does not start, stop, or delete containers/resources. It targets an authorized already-running instance, rewrites only config.url, captures the outbound Authorization material, and restores the original datasource by default.

Impact

This breaks the intended application-user versus builder/admin boundary for external REST datasource credentials. A Basic app user should be able to use published app functionality, but should not be able to administer datasource connection settings or extract builder-configured REST auth secrets. In a realistic internal-tool deployment, REST datasource auth configs often contain bearer tokens, API keys, Basic credentials, OAuth client secrets, service account tokens, or integration credentials for ticketing, CRM, ERP, security, and operational systems.

An attacker with only Basic app-user access to an app that uses an authenticated REST datasource can redirect future query traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint and collect the preserved server-side Authorization header. This is distinct from public REST datasource SSRF issues because the core impact is stored credential disclosure across the role boundary, and it works with an external attacker-controlled URL rather than depending on internal-network reachability.

Remediation ideas

  • Move GET/PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceId behind Builder/Admin datasource permissions, or add datasource-specific resource authorization.
  • Do not allow non-builder app users to update datasource config, authConfigs, base URL, default headers, or plugin connection settings.
  • Split non-sensitive datasource metadata reads from credential-bearing/admin datasource reads.
  • Treat redaction placeholders as valid only in trusted builder/admin update flows.
  • Consider rotating REST datasource auth secrets for affected deployments after patching.

Duplicate/nearby public issue notes

Public triage found known Budibase REST datasource SSRF and protected-endpoint auth-bypass CVEs, but no obvious public duplicate for this specific Basic app-user PUT /api/datasources/:id role-boundary issue combined with preserved REST authConfigs secret exfiltration through a changed datasource base URL.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@budibase/server
< 3.39.0
3.39.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@budibase/server npm → 3.39.0

npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.0
yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.0
pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx
Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url`
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7
Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7
Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435
Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr
Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm
Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential
Medium Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr
Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF)
High Also affects @budibase/server
GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2
Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector
High Also affects @budibase/server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor