Skip to content

GHSA-3g9h-9hp4-654v CVE-2026-33203 GO-2026-4752

SiYuan has an Unauthenticated WebSocket DoS via Auth Keepalive Bypass

High Go
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.52%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.00% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-248 Uncaught Exception
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
3.6.2
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

Summary

The SiYuan kernel WebSocket server accepts unauthenticated connections when a specific “auth keepalive” query parameter is present. After connection, incoming messages are parsed using unchecked type assertions on attacker-controlled JSON.

A remote attacker can send malformed messages that trigger a runtime panic, potentially crashing the kernel process and causing denial of service.

Details

1. Authentication Bypass via Keepalive Query

Unauthenticated connections are accepted if the request URI matches a specific pattern intended for an authentication page keepalive.

File: kernel/server/serve.go

if !authOk {
    authOk = strings.Contains(s.Request.RequestURI, "/ws?app=siyuan") &&
             strings.Contains(s.Request.RequestURI, "&id=auth&type=auth")
}

2. Unsafe Type Assertions on Untrusted Input

Incoming JSON messages are parsed into a generic map and fields are accessed without validation.

File: kernel/server/serve.go

cmdStr := request["cmd"].(string)
cmdId  := request["reqId"].(float64)
param  := request["param"].(map[string]interface{})

Malformed or missing fields trigger a runtime panic. The handler does not implement local panic recovery, allowing crashes to propagate.

PoC

Step 1 — Prepare workspace directory

mkdir -p ./workspace

Step 2 — Run SiYuan container

docker run -d \
  -p 6806:6806 \
  -e SIYUAN_ACCESS_AUTH_CODE_BYPASS=true \
  -v $(pwd)/workspace:/siyuan/workspace \
  b3log/siyuan \
  --workspace=/siyuan/workspace

Service becomes reachable at http://127.0.0.1:6806

Step 3 — Confirm service availability

Open in browser:

http://127.0.0.1:6806

Step 4 — Connect to unauthenticated WebSocket endpoint

ws://127.0.0.1:6806/ws?app=siyuan&id=auth&type=auth

This connection is accepted without credentials.

Step 5 — Send malformed payload

Payload:


{}

Step 6 — Observe behavior

Monitor container logs:


docker logs -f <container_id>

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker with network access can repeatedly crash the kernel, causing persistent denial of service.

Impact is highest when the service is exposed beyond localhost (e.g., Docker deployments, reverse proxies, LAN access, or public hosting).

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 3.6.2
3.6.2
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 3.6.2

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v3.6.2 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-248: Uncaught Exception

An exception is thrown from a function, but it is not caught.

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor