Skip to content

GHSA-33rr-wq23-g6gg CVE-2026-107809 GO-2026-6703

Nginx-UI AuthRequired token cookie fallback enables CSRF against management APIs

High Go
Severity
8.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.23%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 13.40% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
1.9.10-0.20260728074433-a3999bd78a3b
Upgrade github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI to this version or later

Description

Summary

Nginx-UI v2.4.3 stores the API JWT in a browser cookie named token and the AuthRequired middleware accepts that cookie as an authentication source. Because management endpoints are protected by AuthRequired and do not enforce a universal CSRF token or Origin/Referer check, a remote attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit cross-site state-changing requests. The attacker does not need to read the cross-origin response; the browser-sent cookie is enough to authenticate the request.

Details

The root cause is a trust-boundary failure between browser-managed cookies and API bearer-token authentication. In app/src/pinia/moudule/user.ts:25-35, the front end writes the JWT to a token cookie when the token changes. In internal/middleware/middleware.go:16-36, getToken first checks the Authorization header and token query parameter, then falls back to c.Cookie("token"). That fallback causes browser-initiated cross-site requests to carry a valid API credential automatically. The route group in router/routers.go:87-110 applies middleware.AuthRequired() to many management modules, including config.InitRouter, nginx.InitRouter, settings.InitRouter, and backup-related handlers. For accounts without OTP/Passkey, RequireSecureSession does not provide a universal second factor for all state-changing operations. A representative sink is api/config/add.go:68-78, where an authenticated request writes Nginx configuration with os.WriteFile and then calls nginx.Control(nginx.Reload). CORS does not mitigate this issue because preventing cross-origin response reads does not prevent cross-site form or no-cors requests from being sent with cookies.

Core vulnerable code path:

// app/src/pinia/moudule/user.ts:25-35
watch(token, v => {
    if (v) {
      cookies.set('token', v, getCookieOptions(86400))
      if (!shortToken.value) {
        void fetchShortToken()
      }
    }
    else {
      cookies.remove('token', { path: '/' })
      shortToken.value = ''
    }
  })

The front end stores the authentication token in a token cookie. The cookie is created client-side and is not shown here as HttpOnly; it becomes the credential that the back end later accepts through cookie fallback.

// internal/middleware/middleware.go:16-36
// getToken from header, cookie or query
func getToken(c *gin.Context) (token string) {
	if token = c.GetHeader("Authorization"); token != "" {
		return
	}

	if token = c.Query("token"); token != "" {
		if len(token) > 16 {
			// Long token (base64 encoded JWT)
			tokenBytes, _ := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(token)
			return string(tokenBytes)
		}
		// Short token (16 characters)
		return token
	}

	if token, _ = c.Cookie("token"); token != "" {
		return token
	}

	return ""
}

getToken accepts the token cookie as an authentication credential after checking the header and query parameter. That behavior lets a browser-sent cookie authenticate state-changing API requests triggered from another origin.

// router/routers.go:87-110
// Authorization required and not websocket request
		g := root.Group("/", middleware.AuthRequired(), middleware.Proxy())
		{
			debug.InitRouter(g)
			user.InitUserRouter(g)
			analytic.InitRouter(g)
			user.InitManageUserRouter(g)
			nginx.InitRouter(g)
			sites.InitRouter(g)
			streams.InitRouter(g)
			config.InitRouter(g)
			template.InitRouter(g)
			certificate.InitCertificateRouter(g)
			certificate.InitDNSCredentialRouter(g)
			certificate.InitAcmeUserRouter(g)
			dnsapi.InitRouter(g)
			system.InitPrivateRouter(g)
			settings.InitRouter(g)
			llm.InitRouter(g)
			cluster.InitRouter(g)
			notification.InitRouter(g)
			external_notify.InitRouter(g)
			backup.InitAutoBackupRouter(g)
			nginxLog.InitRouter(g)
			upstream.InitHTTPRouter(g)

Many management modules, including Nginx, configuration, settings, backup, and user management, are placed behind AuthRequired. The cookie fallback therefore protects high-impact state-changing routes, not only read-only endpoints.

// api/config/add.go:68-78
err = os.WriteFile(path, []byte(content), 0644)
	if err != nil {
		cosy.ErrHandler(c, err)
		return
	}

	res := nginx.Control(nginx.Reload)
	if res.IsError() {
		res.RespError(c)
		return
	}

This representative sink shows why the CSRF is high impact: once authenticated through the cookie fallback, a request can write Nginx configuration content and trigger a reload.

POC

Prerequisites: an administrator is logged in to Nginx-UI and has a browser token cookie; the administrator account has not enabled OTP/Passkey, or the chosen target endpoint does not require secure-session proof; the attacker knows the Nginx-UI management URL and can induce the administrator to visit an attacker-controlled page. Reproduction: (1) Host an attacker page at GET /csrf.html that automatically submits a cross-site request to the victim instance. (2) The page submits POST /api/configs with configuration fields such as base_dir, name, content, overwrite, and sync_node_ids; the attacker does not need to read the response. (3) When the administrator visits the page, the browser attaches the victim site's token cookie. (4) Expected result: AuthRequired authenticates from the cookie, AddConfig writes the Nginx configuration, and the application attempts an Nginx reload. Testing should use a harmless configuration in an isolated environment.

Impact

An attacker can trigger administrative operations while an administrator is logged in, including Nginx configuration creation or modification, reload/restart operations, settings changes, and backup-related actions depending on endpoint protections. Direct impacts include traffic redirection, reverse proxy tampering, denial of service, and sensitive configuration changes. In deployments with permissive Nginx modules or dangerous configuration capabilities, configuration tampering may lead to further server-side impact or internal network abuse.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
>= 1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1, < 1.9.10-0.20260728074433-a3999bd78a3b
1.9.10-0.20260728074433-a3999bd78a3b

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI Go → 1.9.10-0.20260728074433-a3999bd78a3b

go
go get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260728074433-a3999bd78a3b && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GO-2026-6773
Nginx UI: Casdoor SSO callback uses a constant `state` parameter (login CSRF)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-vc32-4gwf-77xp
Nginx UI: OTP secure-session step-up can be bypassed via MCP configuration tools
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-wq4w-vwvq-q3x9
Nginx UI: Standalone short tokens survive administrative revocation in cache and authenticate again after account re-enable
Medium Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-jrq7-xrjx-pcfw
Nginx UI: Auto backup name allows path traversal outside validated storage path
Medium Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-5r62-gj48-897x
Nginx UI: MCP configuration tools bypass restricted directive validation and allow secondary authenticated users to execute NJS in Nginx worker context
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-9jww-cxg5-rj9m
Nginx UI: MCP `nginx_config_add` Bypasses Directive Validation — Authenticated RCE
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-76pm-mq2q-9gcr
Nginx UI: MCP nginx_config_add skips config directive validation → authenticated nginx directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
GHSA-cf23-7qxj-xmhr
Nginx UI: nginx config directive denylist (ValidateConfigFile) is bypassable via same-line ";" separation → authenticated directive injection (RCE on the official image)
High Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor