Skip to content

GHSA-2xpp-75vr-22vq CVE-2018-17192

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames in Apache nifif

Medium Maven
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.68%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 85.82% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1021 Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
Fix
1.8.0
Upgrade org.apache.nifi:nifi to this version or later

Description

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on the Apache NiFi 1.8.0 release. Users running a prior 1.x release should upgrade to the appropriate release.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.nifi:nifi
>= 1.0.0, < 1.8.0
1.8.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.nifi:nifi Maven → 1.8.0

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.nifi</groupId><artifactId>nifi</artifactId><version>1.8.0</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.nifi:nifi:1.8.0")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.0 6.5

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: The use of X-Frame-Options allows developers of web content to restrict the usage of their application within the form of overlays, frames, or iFrames. The developer can indicate from which domains can frame the content. The concept of X-Frame-Options is well documented, but implementation of this protection mechanism is in development to cover gaps. There is a need for allowing frames from multiple domains.
  • Implementation: A developer can use a "frame-breaker" script in each page that should not be framed. This is very helpful for legacy browsers that do not support X-Frame-Options security feature previously mentioned. It is also important to note that this tactic has been circumvented or bypassed. Improper usage of frames can persist in the web application through nested frames. The "frame-breaking" script does not intuitively account for multiple nested frames that can be presented to the user.
  • Implementation: This defense-in-depth technique can be used to prevent the improper usage of frames in web applications. It prioritizes the valid sources of data to be loaded into the application through the usage of declarative policies. Based on which implementation of Content Security Policy is in use, the developer should use the "frame-ancestors" directive or the "frame-src" directive to mitigate this weakness. Both directives allow for the placement of restrictions when it comes to allowing embedded content.
  • Implementation: In addition to frames or iframes as previously mentioned, the web application is expected to place restrictions on whether it is allowed to be rendered within objects, embed, or applet elements.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-77hf-23pq-2g7c
Code injection in Apache NiFi and NiFi Registry
High Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-m5r7-w9v3-ghmx
Cross-site Scripting in Apache NiFi
Medium Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-jvx9-rj3w-jq99
Origin Validation Error in Apache NiFi
High Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-qj7f-j6h9-g5rq
XML External Entity Reference in Apache NiFi
Medium Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-jrcc-7jf5-3pxg
Injection in Apache NiFi
Critical Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-29ph-fjf3-c5cm
Apache NiFi XSS issue in context path handling
Critical Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-w4x6-j349-9r57
Apache NiFi host header poisoning issue
High Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
GHSA-p76j-5v6v-6c22
Apache NiFi JMS Deserialization issue
High Also affects org.apache.nifi:nifi
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor