GHSA-2wfh-rcwf-wh23 CVE-2026-35214
Budibase: Path traversal in plugin file upload enables arbitrary directory deletion and file write
- Severity
- 8.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.56%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 46.86% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- Fix
3.33.4- Upgrade @budibase/server to this version or later
Description
Summary
The plugin file upload endpoint (POST /api/plugin/upload) passes the user-supplied filename directly to createTempFolder() without sanitizing path traversal sequences. An attacker with Global Builder privileges can craft a multipart upload with a filename containing ../ to delete arbitrary directories via rmSync and write arbitrary files via tarball extraction to any filesystem path the Node.js process can access.
Severity
- Attack Vector: Network — exploitable via the plugin upload HTTP API
- Attack Complexity: Low — no special conditions; a single crafted multipart request suffices
- Privileges Required: High — requires Global Builder role (
GLOBAL_BUILDERpermission) - User Interaction: None
- Scope: Changed — the plugin upload feature is scoped to a temp directory, but the traversal escapes to the host filesystem
- Confidentiality Impact: None — the vulnerability enables deletion and writing, not reading
- Integrity Impact: High — attacker can delete arbitrary directories and write arbitrary files via tarball extraction
- Availability Impact: High — recursive deletion of application or system directories causes denial of service
Severity Rationale
Despite the real filesystem impact, severity is bounded by the requirement for Global Builder privileges (PR:H), which is the highest non-admin role in Budibase. In self-hosted deployments the Global Builder may already have server access, further reducing practical impact. In cloud/multi-tenant deployments the impact is more significant as it could affect the host infrastructure.
Affected Component
packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/file.ts—fileUpload()(line 15)packages/server/src/utilities/fileSystem/filesystem.ts—createTempFolder()(lines 78-91)
Description
Unsanitized filename flows into filesystem operations
In packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/file.ts, the uploaded file's name is used directly after stripping the .tar.gz suffix:
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/file.ts:8-19
export async function fileUpload(file: KoaFile) {
if (!file.name || !file.path) {
throw new Error("File is not valid - cannot upload.")
}
if (!file.name.endsWith(".tar.gz")) {
throw new Error("Plugin must be compressed into a gzipped tarball.")
}
const path = createTempFolder(file.name.split(".tar.gz")[0])
await extractTarball(file.path, path)
return await getPluginMetadata(path)
}
The file.name originates from the Content-Disposition header's filename field in the multipart upload, parsed by formidable (via koa-body 4.2.0). Formidable does not sanitize path traversal sequences from filenames.
The createTempFolder function in packages/server/src/utilities/fileSystem/filesystem.ts uses path.join() which resolves ../ sequences, then performs destructive filesystem operations:
// packages/server/src/utilities/fileSystem/filesystem.ts:78-91
export const createTempFolder = (item: string) => {
const path = join(budibaseTempDir(), item)
try {
// remove old tmp directories automatically - don't combine
if (fs.existsSync(path)) {
fs.rmSync(path, { recursive: true, force: true })
}
fs.mkdirSync(path)
} catch (err: any) {
throw new Error(`Path cannot be created: ${err.message}`)
}
return path
}
The budibaseTempDir() returns /tmp/.budibase (from packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/utils.ts:33). With a filename like ../../etc/target.tar.gz, path.join("/tmp/.budibase", "../../etc/target") resolves to /etc/target.
Inconsistent defenses confirm the gap
The codebase is aware of the risk in similar paths:
-
Safe path in
utils.ts: ThedownloadUnzipTarballfunction (for NPM/GitHub/URL plugin sources) generates a random name server-side:// packages/server/src/api/controllers/plugin/index.ts:68 const name = "PLUGIN_" + Math.floor(100000 + Math.random() * 900000)This is safe because
namenever contains user input. -
Safe path in
objectStore.ts: Other uses ofbudibaseTempDir()use UUID-generated names:// packages/backend-core/src/objectStore/objectStore.ts:546 const outputPath = join(budibaseTempDir(), v4()) -
Sanitization exists but is not applied: The codebase has
sanitizeKey()inobjectStore.tsfor sanitizing object store paths, but no equivalent is applied tocreateTempFolder's input.
The file upload path is the only caller of createTempFolder that passes unsanitized user input.
Execution chain
- Authenticated Global Builder sends
POST /api/plugin/uploadwith a multipart file whoseContent-Dispositionfilename contains path traversal (e.g.,../../etc/target.tar.gz) - koa-body/formidable parses the upload, setting
file.nameto the raw filename from the header controller.upload→sdk.plugins.processUploaded()→fileUpload(file).endsWith(".tar.gz")check passes (the suffix is present).split(".tar.gz")[0]extracts../../etc/targetcreateTempFolder("../../etc/target")is calledpath.join("/tmp/.budibase", "../../etc/target")resolves to/etc/targetfs.rmSync("/etc/target", { recursive: true, force: true })— deletes the target directory recursivelyfs.mkdirSync("/etc/target")— creates a directory at the traversed pathextractTarball(file.path, "/etc/target")— extracts attacker-controlled tarball contents to the traversed path
Proof of Concept
# Create a minimal tarball with a test file
mkdir -p /tmp/plugin-poc && echo "pwned" > /tmp/plugin-poc/test.txt
tar czf /tmp/poc-plugin.tar.gz -C /tmp/plugin-poc .
# Upload with a traversal filename targeting /tmp/pwned (non-destructive demo)
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:10000/api/plugin/upload' \
-H 'Cookie: <global_builder_session_cookie>' \
-F "file=@/tmp/poc-plugin.tar.gz;filename=../../tmp/pwned.tar.gz"
# Result: server executes:
# rm -rf /tmp/pwned (if exists)
# mkdir /tmp/pwned
# tar xzf <upload> -C /tmp/pwned
# Verify: ls /tmp/pwned/test.txt
Impact
- Arbitrary directory deletion:
rmSyncwith{ recursive: true, force: true }deletes any directory the Node.js process can access, including application data directories - Arbitrary file write: Tarball extraction writes attacker-controlled files to any writable path, potentially overwriting application code, configuration, or system files
- Denial of service: Deleting critical directories (e.g., the application's data directory, node_modules, or system directories) crashes the application
- Potential code execution: In containerized deployments (common for Budibase) where Node.js runs as root, an attacker could overwrite startup scripts or application code to achieve remote code execution on subsequent restarts
Recommended Remediation
Option 1: Sanitize at createTempFolder (preferred — protects all callers)
import { join, resolve } from "path"
export const createTempFolder = (item: string) => {
const tempDir = budibaseTempDir()
const resolved = resolve(tempDir, item)
// Ensure the resolved path is within the temp directory
if (!resolved.startsWith(tempDir + "/") && resolved !== tempDir) {
throw new Error("Invalid path: directory traversal detected")
}
try {
if (fs.existsSync(resolved)) {
fs.rmSync(resolved, { recursive: true, force: true })
}
fs.mkdirSync(resolved)
} catch (err: any) {
throw new Error(`Path cannot be created: ${err.message}`)
}
return resolved
}
Option 2: Sanitize at the upload handler (defense-in-depth)
Strip path components from the filename before use:
import path from "path"
export async function fileUpload(file: KoaFile) {
if (!file.name || !file.path) {
throw new Error("File is not valid - cannot upload.")
}
if (!file.name.endsWith(".tar.gz")) {
throw new Error("Plugin must be compressed into a gzipped tarball.")
}
// Strip directory components from the filename
const safeName = path.basename(file.name).split(".tar.gz")[0]
const dir = createTempFolder(safeName)
await extractTarball(file.path, dir)
return await getPluginMetadata(dir)
}
Both options should ideally be applied together for defense-in-depth.
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @budibase/server | < 3.33.4 |
3.33.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@budibase/server npm → 3.33.4
- npm
npm install @budibase/server@3.33.4- yarn
yarn add @budibase/server@3.33.4- pnpm
pnpm add @budibase/server@3.33.4
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-6x9p-4r67-5gjx Budibase authenticated arbitrary S3 signed upload URL issuance via `/api/attachments/:datasourceId/url` | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-5fpj-28rv-84r7 Budibase: SSRF in Automation Steps - Webhook, Zapier, N8N, Slack, Discord Bypass IP Blacklist | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7 Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-v42f-v8xc-j435 Budibase: SSRF via DNS rebinding in the REST datasource integration | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pmpg-2mxq-6xwr Budibase: NoSQL injection in MongoDB integration: collection dump, $where JS exec, cross-collection pivot, arbitrary update/delete | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm Budibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential | Medium | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-pvcr-8mvp-w8qr Budibase: Chat-Link Handoff Identity Confusion (Same-Tenant Account-Link CSRF) | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
| GHSA-2xgg-r2wc-c5r2 Budibase: MySQL DESCRIBE Backtick Injection via multipleStatements in Database Connector | High | Also affects @budibase/server |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor