GHSA-2gc7-j998-5xx6 CVE-2026-84314 GO-2026-6771
Nginx UI: Account Takeover via Missing `RequireSecureSession` on User Management Endpoint
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.42%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 36.25% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-285 Improper Authorization
- Fix
1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0- Upgrade github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI to this version or later
Description
Summary
POST /api/users/:id allows any authenticated user to change any other user's password without RequireSecureSession (2FA verification). In contrast, the self password change endpoint POST /api/user/password correctly requires RequireSecureSession. This inconsistency enables any authenticated user to take over the initial admin account (user ID 1) by simply changing its password.
Details
nginx-ui enforces RequireSecureSession middleware on sensitive operations such as self password change (api/user/router.go:55), self profile update (api/user/router.go:54), settings modification (api/settings/router.go:12), and config file deletion/rename (api/config/router.go:16-21).
However, the user management endpoint registered in InitManageUserRouter (api/user/user.go:31-68) is mounted on the g router group (router/routers.go:92) which only applies middleware.AuthRequired() and middleware.Proxy() — no RequireSecureSession().
As a result, POST /api/users/:id with a password field in the JSON body updates the target user's password with only basic JWT authentication. No 2FA or secure session verification is performed, even if the target user has 2FA enabled.
The attack flow:
- Attacker authenticates as any user (e.g., user ID 2).
- Attacker sends
POST /api/users/1with{"password": "attacker-chosen"}. - Admin (user ID 1) password is changed. All existing admin tokens are invalidated (
api/user/user.go:48-49). - Attacker logs in as admin with the new password.
- Admin is locked out.
PoC
Please extract the uploaded compressed file before proceeding
- docker compose up -d
- python3 poc.py
<img width="501" height="55" alt="스크린샷 2026-04-22 오후 10 26 29" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6562ede2-7c11-48da-b905-be9964f4f7b1" />
Impact
- Any authenticated user can change any other user's password, including the initial admin (user ID 1).
- Full account takeover of the admin account.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | < 1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0 |
1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI Go → 1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0
- go
go get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260703131214-23d1934099b0 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
Weakness
CWE-285: Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GO-2026-6773 Nginx UI: Casdoor SSO callback uses a constant `state` parameter (login CSRF) | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-vc32-4gwf-77xp Nginx UI: OTP secure-session step-up can be bypassed via MCP configuration tools | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-wq4w-vwvq-q3x9 Nginx UI: Standalone short tokens survive administrative revocation in cache and authenticate again after account re-enable | Medium | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-jrq7-xrjx-pcfw Nginx UI: Auto backup name allows path traversal outside validated storage path | Medium | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-5r62-gj48-897x Nginx UI: MCP configuration tools bypass restricted directive validation and allow secondary authenticated users to execute NJS in Nginx worker context | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-9jww-cxg5-rj9m Nginx UI: MCP `nginx_config_add` Bypasses Directive Validation — Authenticated RCE | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-76pm-mq2q-9gcr Nginx UI: MCP nginx_config_add skips config directive validation → authenticated nginx directive injection (RCE on the official image) | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
| GHSA-cf23-7qxj-xmhr Nginx UI: nginx config directive denylist (ValidateConfigFile) is bypassable via same-line ";" separation → authenticated directive injection (RCE on the official image) | High | Also affects github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor