CWE-177: Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding)
Variant
The product does not properly handle when all or part of an input has been URL encoded.
Consequences
- Integrity: Unexpected State
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Recent advisories
- CVE-2026-76504 — A vulnerability in the API session-based authentication management of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access…
- GHSA-jqff-g426-hqxp — fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via percent-encoded scheme normalization
- GHSA-x428-ghpx-8j92 — @fastify/static vulnerable to route guard bypass via encoded path separators
- GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr — Hono vulnerable to arbitrary file access via serveStatic vulnerability
- GHSA-fvhj-4qfh-q2hm — Traefik incorrectly processes fragment in the URL, leads to Authorization Bypass
- GHSA-g8q8-fggx-9r3q — Keycloak vulnerable to path traversal via double URL encoding
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor