PYSEC-2019-85
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing.
- Severity
- Not rated yet
- No source has published a CVSS score yet
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- —
- No score published
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- —
- Not classified
- Fix
2.2.8- Upgrade django to this version or later
Description
Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| django | >= 2.1, < 2.1.15>= 2.2, < 2.2.8 |
2.1.152.2.8 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
django PyPI → 2.2.8
- pip
pip install --upgrade "django>=2.2.8"- poetry
poetry add "django>=2.2.8"- uv
uv add "django>=2.2.8"
References
Other links
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/02/1
- groups.google.com/forum
- djangoproject.com/weblog/2019/dec/02/security-releases
- docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191217-0003
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6R4HD…
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/202004-17
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Withdrawn
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-q238-5cxm-5c9h Django GeoDjango vulnerable to denial of service through deeply nested geometry collections | Medium | Also affects django |
| GHSA-wvqv-fj8w-qmhm Django GeoDjango spatial lookups allow file writes and outbound requests through GDAL raster parsing | High | Also affects django |
| GHSA-8qcx-xf44-272x Django: DomainNameValidator permits newline characters that may enable HTTP header injection | Medium | Also affects django |
| GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w Django: GDALRaster may over-read heap memory when constructed from bytes | Medium | Also affects django |
| GHSA-3h9f-r86x-qvjx Django: cache middleware may expose private responses when unrelated request cookies are present | Medium | Also affects django |
| GHSA-8cjm-8mp7-r2xf Django: UpdateCacheMiddleware may disclose cached responses due to case-sensitive Cache-Control handling | Medium | Also affects django |
| GHSA-mm6v-q8q9-pgcf Django fails to prevent reuse of a partially-initialized connection after a failed `STARTTLS` handshake | Low | Also affects django |
| GHSA-h7pc-vwp9-298g Django: signed cookies are vulnerable to salt namespace collisions | Medium | Also affects django |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor