Skip to content

GHSA-xxhq-69mf-w8cr CVE-2026-52802 GO-2026-5773

Gogs has an Open Redirect via redirect_to

Medium Go
Severity
5.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.55%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 46.28% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
Fix
0.14.3
Upgrade gogs.io/gogs to this version or later

Description

Summary

An open redirect vulnerability exists in Gogs where attacker-controlled redirect_to parameters can bypass validation, allowing redirection to arbitrary external sites.

Details

All redirects in Gogs that are validated via the IsSameSite function are vulnerable:

func IsSameSite(url string) bool {
    return len(url) >= 2 && url[0] == '/' && url[1] != '/' && url[1] != '\\'
}

The function only inspects the first two characters of the URL string. This check fails to account for directory traversal sequences followed by backslashes. For example:

/a/../\example.com

The IsSameSite function checks the input supplied to the redirect_to query parameter value /a/../\example.com and considers it valid.

Because web browsers normalize backslashes \ to forward slashes /, the normalized URL becomes //example.com.

The normalized URL becomes:

//example.com

Resulting in a cross-origin redirect.

This affects all endpoints using the redirect_to query parameter, including login and other post-action flows.

PoC

  1. An attacker can provide a user with a link to login to Gogs with a redirect_to query parameter that redirects a user to a site the attacker wants them to visit:
http://192.168.236.132:3000/user/login?redirect_to=/a/../\example.com

<img width="1339" height="536" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c2a13b8-f0b7-42c2-a223-6f0ebf083589" />

<br> <br>

  1. After the user successfully logs in, they would be redirected to the site an attacker wants them to visit:

<img width="1066" height="463" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1726a3d9-6705-43cc-bdd2-90aad105d021" />

<img width="1097" height="396" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/376052f5-0e00-4d14-a548-fa75a6269530" />

Impact

  • Phishing: Attackers can use trusted domain links to redirect victims to credential-harvesting pages
  • OAuth/SSO Token Theft: In authentication flows, authorization codes or tokens may leak via redirect
  • Referer Leakage: Sensitive URL parameters may be exposed to attacker domains via the Referer header
  • Cache Poisoning: In deployments with shared caches, malicious redirects may be cached and served to other users

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
gogs.io/gogs
< 0.14.3
0.14.3
gogs.io/gogs
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

gogs.io/gogs Go → 0.14.3

go
go get gogs.io/gogs@v0.14.3 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • Architecture and Design: Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "/login.asp" and ID 2 could map to "http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that no externally-supplied requests are honored by requiring that all redirect requests include a unique nonce generated by the application [REF-483]. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls. Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-mq8m-42gh-wq7r
Gogs vulnerable to a bypass of CVE-2024-55947
High Known exploited Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-3w28-36p9-w929
Gogs's Unauthenticated Jupyter Notebook (ipynb) Sanitizer allows arbitrary data: URIs leading to XSS
Medium Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-744x-3838-5r56
Gogs Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Organization Teams Information Disclosure via API
Medium Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-xp79-5mx3-jx52
Gogs has Unauthenticated Asymmetric Denial of Service (DoS) via SSH Handshake Stall (File Descriptor Exhaustion)
Medium Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-c39w-43gm-34h5
Gogs has Path Traversal in organization name that results in RCE through Git hooks
Critical Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-6p9m-q3jp-47h4
Gogs: LFS dedupe path leaks private repo content across tenants
High Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-89mr-xqfv-758m
Gogs: UploadRepoFiles writes outside repo working tree via committed parent sym
Critical Also affects gogs.io/gogs
GHSA-wmfg-5p4h-5fw3
Gogs allows users to write to readonly repositories using receive-pack + service=git-upload-pack confusion
High Also affects gogs.io/gogs
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor