Skip to content

GHSA-xvj8-ph7x-65gf CVE-2026-40880

Zebra: Cached Mempool Verification Bypasses Consensus Rules for Ahead-of-Tip Blocks

High crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.26%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 17.86% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1025 Comparison Using Wrong Factors
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

CVE-2026-40880: Cached Mempool Verification Bypasses Consensus Rules for Ahead-of-Tip Blocks

Summary

A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By carefully submitting a transaction that is valid for height H+1 but invalid for H+2 and then mining that transaction in a block at height H+2, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network.

Severity

High - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.

Affected Versions

All Zebra versions prior to version 4.3.1. (Some older versions are not affected but are no longer supported by the network)

Description

The vulnerability exists due to a performance optimization whose goal is to improve performance of transaction validation if the transaction was previously accepted into the mempool (and thus was verified as valid). That however did not take into account that a transaction can be valid for a specific height, but invalid at higher heights; for example, it can contain an expiry height, a lock time, and it is always bound to a network upgrade, all of which are height-dependant.

An attacker (specifically a malicious miner) could exploit this by (e.g. in the expiry height case):

  • Submitting a transaction with expiry height H+1 (where H is the height of the current tip)
  • Mining a block H+1, and a block H+2 that contains that same transaction, and submitting block H+2 before H+1
  • Zebra nodes would accept H+2 as valid (pending contextual verification) and wait for block H+1; when it arrives, Zebra would commit both blocks even if H+2 contains an expired transaction
  • Other nodes (like zcashd or zebrad nodes without that transaction in their mempool) reject the block, resulting in a chain fork where the poisoned Zebra node is isolated.

Impact

Consensus Failure

Attack Vector: Network (specifically via a malicious miner). Effect: Network partition/consensus split. Scope: Any Zebra node utilizing the transaction verification cache optimization for V5 transactions.

Fixed Versions

This issue is fixed in Zebra 4.3.1.

We removed the performance optimization altogether, since we deemed it too risky.

The fix ensures that verification is only skipped if the transaction's full integrity—including authorization data—is validated against the mempool entry.

Mitigation

Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.3.0 or later immediately.

There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to ensure the node remains on the correct consensus path and is protected against malicious chain forks.

Credits

Thanks to @sangsoo-osec for a thorough advisory submission that noticed the lock time issue, and to @shieldedonly with an also thorough advisory (that was submitted while we were working on the first one) who noticed that the issue applied to other aspects of the transaction validation.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
zebra-consensus
< 5.0.2
5.0.2
zebrad
< 4.3.1
4.3.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

zebra-consensus crates.io → 5.0.2

cargo
cargo update -p zebra-consensus --precise 5.0.2

zebrad crates.io → 4.3.1

cargo
cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.3.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
High

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1025: Comparison Using Wrong Factors

The code performs a comparison between two entities, but the comparison examines the wrong factors or characteristics of the entities, which can lead to incorrect results and resultant weaknesses.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-ww9q-8r59-xv46
Zebra: Missing copy constraint in halo2_gadgets variable-base scalar multiplication allows under-constrained base, breaking Orchard Action circuit soundness
Critical Also affects zebrad
GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8
Zebra Address Book Aborted by IPv4-Mapped Mempool Misbehavior Update
High Also affects zebrad
GHSA-65jj-fmw8-468q
zebrad has unbounded memory leak in mempool download pipeline via timeout path cancel_handles retention
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-2gf8-q9rr-jq3h
zebrad has persistent on-disk corruption of Sapling/Orchard subtree roots after chain fork via pop_tip
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-hhm7-qrv5-h4r6
Zebra: Repeated Non-Finalized Shielded Transaction Aborts Zebra Before Duplicate-Nullifier Rejection
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-w834-cf6p-9m9w
Zebra: Finalized address balance credit-first overflow on consensus-valid blocks
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx
Zebra has sync restart poisoning from single unauthenticated peer via above-lookahead block
Medium Also affects zebra-consensus
GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx
zebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser
Critical Also affects zebrad
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor