GHSA-xhq9-58fw-859p CVE-2026-33888
ApostropheCMS: publicApiProjection Bypass via project Query Builder in Piece-Type REST API
- Severity
- 5.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.51%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.72% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
4.29.0- Upgrade apostrophe to this version or later
Description
Summary
The getRestQuery method in the @apostrophecms/piece-type module checks whether a MongoDB projection has already been set before applying the admin-configured publicApiProjection. An unauthenticated attacker can supply a project query parameter in the REST API request to pre-populate the projection state, causing the security-enforced publicApiProjection to be skipped entirely. This allows disclosure of fields that the site administrator explicitly restricted from public access.
Details
When an unauthenticated user queries the piece-type REST API, the getRestQuery method processes the request at modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1120:
// piece-type/index.js:1120-1137
getRestQuery(req, omitPermissionCheck = false) {
const query = self.find(req).attachments(true);
query.applyBuildersSafely(req.query); // [1] attacker input applied first
if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
query.and({
_id: null
});
} else if (!query.state.project) { // [2] checks if projection already set
query.project({
...self.options.publicApiProjection,
cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
});
}
}
return query;
},
At [1], applyBuildersSafely iterates over all query string parameters and invokes their corresponding builder methods. The project builder exists in @apostrophecms/doc-type with a launder method (doc-type/index.js:1876) that sanitizes values to booleans:
// doc-type/index.js:1875-1889
project: {
launder (p) {
if (!p || typeof p !== 'object' || Array.isArray(p)) {
return {};
}
const projection = Object.entries(p).reduce((acc, [ key, val ]) => {
return {
...acc,
[key]: self.apos.launder.boolean(val)
};
}, {});
return projection;
},
When a request includes ?project[someField]=1, the builder sets query.state.project to {someField: true}. At [2], the conditional !query.state.project evaluates to false because the state is already populated, so the publicApiProjection is never applied.
For comparison, the @apostrophecms/page module's equivalent method (page/index.js:2953) unconditionally applies the projection:
// page/index.js:2953-2958
} else {
query.project({
...self.options.publicApiProjection,
cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
});
}
PoC
Prerequisites: An ApostropheCMS 4.x instance with a piece-type (e.g., article) that has publicApiProjection configured to restrict fields. For example:
// modules/article/index.js
module.exports = {
extend: '@apostrophecms/piece-type',
options: {
publicApiProjection: {
title: 1,
_url: 1
}
}
};
Step 1: Normal request — observe restricted fields are hidden:
curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article'
Response returns only title and _url fields per the configured projection.
Step 2: Bypass projection by supplying project query parameter:
curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article?project[internalNotes]=1&project[title]=1&project[slug]=1&project[createdAt]=1'
Response now includes internalNotes, slug, createdAt, and any other requested fields — bypassing the admin-configured publicApiProjection restriction.
Step 3: Request all default fields by projecting inclusion of sensitive fields:
curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article?project[_id]=1&project[title]=1&project[slug]=1&project[visibility]=1&project[type]=1&project[createdAt]=1&project[updatedAt]=1'
All requested fields are returned, confirming the publicApiProjection is fully bypassed.
Impact
- Information Disclosure: An unauthenticated attacker can read any field on documents that are already publicly queryable, bypassing administrator-configured field restrictions. This may expose internal notes, draft content, metadata, or other sensitive fields the administrator intentionally hid from the public API.
- Scope: Affects all piece-type modules with
publicApiProjectionconfigured. The attacker cannot access documents they wouldn't otherwise be able to query (document-level permissions still apply), but they can read any field on accessible documents. - Exploitability: Trivial — requires only appending query parameters to a public URL. No authentication, special tools, or chaining required.
Recommended Fix
Remove the conditional check on query.state.project in piece-type/index.js, matching the page module's unconditional behavior. The admin-configured publicApiProjection should always override any user-supplied projection for unauthenticated users:
// modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1123-1134
// BEFORE (vulnerable):
if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
query.and({
_id: null
});
} else if (!query.state.project) {
query.project({
...self.options.publicApiProjection,
cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
});
}
}
// AFTER (fixed):
if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
query.and({
_id: null
});
} else {
query.project({
...self.options.publicApiProjection,
cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
});
}
}
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| apostrophe | < 4.29.0 |
4.29.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
apostrophe npm → 4.29.0
- npm
npm install apostrophe@4.29.0- yarn
yarn add apostrophe@4.29.0- pnpm
pnpm add apostrophe@4.29.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated resource exhaustion via pre-auth aposBigUpload processing in @apostrophecms/import-export | High | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-653j-g8j7-gh54 ApostropheCMS: No Attempt Throttling on Authenticated Password-Change Endpoint Enables Unlimited Current-Password Guessing | Medium | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-vwwx-px9w-crrc ApostropheCMS: Missing Authorization on Notification PATCH/DELETE Endpoints | Low | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-vmxh-77cw-65j7 ApostropheCMS: Authenticated Object-Level Authorization Bypass in exist-in-locale Reveals Restricted Localized Draft Identifiers | Medium | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-m2m5-rw3w-cwmj ApostropheCMS: Client-side Prototype Pollution in apos.http.parseQuery leading to DOM-based XSS against authenticated users | Medium | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-gqh3-7856-rjjg ApostropheCMS: :_id/locales REST route omits the public-API authorization gate its sibling read routes enforce (unauthenticated doc-existence + locale metadata disclosure) | Medium | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-hhvr-8m24-qqr3 ApostropheCMS: Cross-domain session token in URL confers session takeover | Medium | Also affects apostrophe |
| GHSA-j5rq-xfvr-p969 ApostropheCMS: Authenticated projection-exclusion prototype-member deletion in @apostrophecms/db-connect causes process-wide denial of service | High | Also affects apostrophe |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor