GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw CVE-2026-42040
Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams
- Severity
- 3.7 / 10
- Low · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.22%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 12.19% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
- CWE-626 Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
- Fix
1.15.1- Upgrade axios to this version or later
Description
Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams
Summary
The encode() function in lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js contains a character mapping (charMap) at line 21 that reverses the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After encodeURIComponent('\x00') correctly produces the safe sequence %00, the charMap entry '%00': '\x00' converts it back to a raw null byte.
This is a clear encoding defect: every other charMap entry encodes in the safe direction (literal → percent-encoded), while this single entry decodes in the opposite (dangerous) direction.
Severity: Low (CVSS 3.7)
Affected Versions: All versions containing this charMap entry
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:21
CWE
- CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
- CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CVSS 3.1
Score: 3.7 (Low)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | Attacker controls input parameters remotely |
| Attack Complexity | High | Standard axios request flow (buildURL) uses its own encode function which does NOT have this bug. Only triggered via direct AxiosURLSearchParams.toString() without an encoder, or via custom paramsSerializer delegation |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Impact limited to HTTP request URL |
| Confidentiality | None | No confidentiality impact |
| Integrity | Low | Null byte in URL can cause truncation in C-based backends, but requires a vulnerable downstream parser |
| Availability | None | No availability impact |
Vulnerable Code
File: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js, lines 13-26
function encode(str) {
const charMap = {
'!': '%21', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
"'": '%27', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'(': '%28', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
')': '%29', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'~': '%7E', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'%20': '+', // standard transformation (SAFE)
'%00': '\x00', // LINE 21: encoded → raw null byte (UNSAFE direction!)
};
return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20|%00/g, function replacer(match) {
return charMap[match];
});
}
Why the Standard Flow Is NOT Affected
// buildURL.js:36 — uses its OWN encode function (lines 14-20), not AxiosURLSearchParams's
const _encode = (options && options.encode) || encode; // buildURL's encode
// buildURL.js:53 — passes buildURL's encode to AxiosURLSearchParams
new AxiosURLSearchParams(params, _options).toString(_encode); // external encoder used
// AxiosURLSearchParams.js:48 — when encoder is provided, internal encode is NOT used
const _encode = encoder ? function(value) { return encoder.call(this, value, encode); } : encode;
// ^^^^^^
// internal encode passed as 2nd arg but only used if
// the external encoder explicitly delegates to it
Proof of Concept
import AxiosURLSearchParams from './lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js';
import buildURL from './lib/helpers/buildURL.js';
// Test 1: Direct AxiosURLSearchParams (VULNERABLE path)
const params = new AxiosURLSearchParams({ file: 'test\x00.txt' });
const result = params.toString(); // NO encoder → uses internal encode with charMap
console.log('Direct toString():', JSON.stringify(result));
// Output: "file=test\u0000.txt" (contains raw null byte)
console.log('Hex:', Buffer.from(result).toString('hex'));
// Output: 66696c653d74657374002e747874 (00 = null byte)
// Test 2: Via buildURL (NOT vulnerable — standard axios flow)
const url = buildURL('http://example.com/api', { file: 'test\x00.txt' });
console.log('Via buildURL:', url);
// Output: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt (%00 preserved safely)
Verified PoC Output
Direct toString(): "file=test\u0000.txt"
Contains raw null byte: true
Hex: 66696c653d74657374002e747874
Via buildURL: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt
Contains raw null byte: false
Contains safe %00: true
Impact Analysis
Primary impact is limited because the standard axios request flow is not affected. However:
- Direct API users: Applications using
AxiosURLSearchParamsdirectly for custom serialization are affected - Custom paramsSerializer: A
paramsSerializer.encodethat delegates to the internal encoder triggers the bug - Code defect signal: The directional inconsistency in charMap is a clear coding error with no legitimate use case
If null bytes reach a downstream C-based parser, impacts include URL truncation, WAF bypass, and log injection.
Recommended Fix
Remove the %00 entry from charMap and update the regex:
function encode(str) {
const charMap = {
'!': '%21',
"'": '%27',
'(': '%28',
')': '%29',
'~': '%7E',
'%20': '+',
// REMOVED: '%00': '\x00'
};
return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20/g, function replacer(match) {
// ^^^^ removed |%00
return charMap[match];
});
}
Resources
- CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error
- CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
- OWASP: Embedding Null Code
- Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-16 | Report revised: documented standard-flow limitation, corrected CVSS |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
Affected versions
npm
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
axios npm → 1.15.1
- npm
npm install axios@1.15.1- yarn
yarn add axios@1.15.1- pnpm
pnpm add axios@1.15.1
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error. Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
- Architecture and Design: In some cases, input validation may be an important strategy when output encoding is not a complete solution. For example, you may be providing the same output that will be processed by multiple consumers that use different encodings or representations. In other cases, you may be required to allow user-supplied input to contain control information, such as limited HTML tags that support formatting in a wiki or bulletin board. When this type of requirement must be met, use an extremely strict allowlist to limit which control sequences can be used. Verify that the resulting syntactic structure is what you expect. Use your normal encoding methods for the remainder of the input.
- Architecture and Design: Use input validation as a defense-in-depth measure to reduce the likelihood of output encoding errors (see CWE-20).
- Requirements: Fully specify which encodings are required by components that will be communicating with each other.
- Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.
CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
The product does not properly handle null bytes or NUL characters when passing data between different representations or components.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Remove null bytes from all incoming strings.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-44g4-m2mj-wpvx Axios: CIDR-form NO_PROXY entries are ignored, causing proxy exclusion bypass for internal IP ranges | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-x97p-jq2g-jp4f Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadget in axios toFormData Options | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-vh66-26gq-q6x8 Axios: Prototype pollution gadget in fetch adapter can alter outbound requests | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-r4gj-5m52-g5wh Axios: maxRedirects: 0 is not enforced by the fetch adapter, allowing redirect-based SSRF | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-mghh-pgcx-3jjj Axios: ReDoS (O(N²)) in shouldBypassProxy host normalization, reachable via untrusted redirect Location | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-m8m8-qj5v-23w3 Axios: Node HTTP adapter prototype-pollution gadget allows request socket hijack via inherited createConnection | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-j8rh-479h-cp32 Axios: Header Injection via Inherited headers After Minimal Interceptor | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-c29m-xwm3-cm6r Axios: ReDoS in fromDataURI data: URL parser freezes the Node event loop (DoS) | High | Also affects axios |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor