Skip to content

GHSA-mghh-pgcx-3jjj CVE-2026-101906

Axios: ReDoS (O(N²)) in shouldBypassProxy host normalization, reachable via untrusted redirect Location

High npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.68% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Fix
1.20.0
Upgrade axios to this version or later

Description

Summary

Axios shouldBypassProxy() normalizes hostnames with hostname.replace(/\.+$/, ''). For a hostname shaped as many dots followed by a non-dot, the anchored regex can perform quadratic backtracking. Because axios re-evaluates proxy bypass rules for redirected requests, a malicious server can trigger this synchronous work through a crafted redirect Location.

The issue affects Node.js applications that use environment proxy variables with NO_PROXY and allow redirects.

Impact

An attacker-controlled server can return a redirect whose hostname causes the axios process to spend significant CPU time in synchronous hostname normalization. During this time, the Node.js event loop is blocked and the application cannot handle other work on that thread.

This is an availability-only issue. It does not disclose request data or modify requests.

Affected Functionality

Affected:

  • Node.js HTTP adapter.
  • Environment proxy handling through HTTP_PROXY or HTTPS_PROXY.
  • NO_PROXY or no_proxy set to a non-empty value.
  • Redirects followed by axios or follow-redirects.

Not affected:

  • Browser adapters.
  • Requests with proxy: false.
  • Requests with no NO_PROXY value.
  • Requests with maxRedirects: 0, unless application code manually follows the malicious redirect and re-enters axios.

Technical Details

lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js contains:

return unmapIPv4MappedIPv6(hostname.replace(/\.+$/, ''));

When the hostname is "." * n + "a", the $ anchor causes the regex engine to retry the dot run from many positions before it fails. setProxy() invokes shouldBypassProxy(location) after getProxyForUrl(location) returns a proxy, including on redirect hops via beforeRedirects.proxy.

Local timing on axios 1.18.1 showed increasing cost for crafted hostnames: about 1 ms at 1000 dots, 6.9 ms at 3000 dots, and 34.5 ms at 6000 dots. The growth is consistent with the submitted quadratic claim while avoiding long-running payloads.

Proof of Concept of Attack

Constrained helper-level demonstration:

import shouldBypassProxy from 'axios/lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js';

process.env.NO_PROXY = 'example.com';
shouldBypassProxy('http://' + '.'.repeat(6000) + 'a/');

In the full adapter path, a malicious server can return that hostname in a 302 Location header while the client has proxy environment variables and NO_PROXY configured.

Workarounds

Disable automatic redirects for requests to untrusted servers, or avoid environment proxy handling for those requests with proxy: false when appropriate. Operators can also avoid broad untrusted redirect-following in services where event-loop availability is critical.

<details> <summary><h3>Original report</h3></summary>

Summary

shouldBypassProxy normalizes a host with hostname.replace(/.+$/, ''). On a host of the shape <many dots><non-dot> (e.g. "." × 40000 + "a"), this anchored regex backtracks quadratically (O(N²)), synchronously starving the Node.js event loop. Because axios re-evaluates the proxy on every redirect using the new Location host, a malicious server can return a crafted 302 Location and freeze the client's event loop for seconds per redirect — a denial of service.

Details

  • Affected code: lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js → normalizeNoProxyHost: hostname.replace(/.+$/, '') (one pass in 1.18.1). The open PR #11029 adds a second /.+$/ pass in normalizeIPAddress, doubling the cost (not the origin).
  • Root cause: /.+$/ is O(N²) on a long run of dots that is not at the end of the string — the $ anchor forces the engine to backtrack the entire dot-run from every start position.
  • Trust boundary (per THREATMODEL): the redirect Location is untrusted (T-2: "axios to network … redirect Location … untrusted"). The caller requests a benign URL; the malicious host arrives via the server's 302. This is not the T-1 caller-supplied-URL non-goal.
  • Call chain: setProxy(options, configProxy, location, isRedirect, …) (lib/adapters/http.js) → env-proxy branch → getProxyForUrl(location) returns a proxy → if (!shouldBypassProxy(location)) → normalizeNoProxyHost(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase()) runs /.+$/. setProxy is re-invoked on the redirect hop with the untrusted Location; new URL() retains the long dot-run in .hostname.
  • Preconditions: proxy configured via environment (HTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY, trusted per THREATMODEL T-3, common in CI/containers/enterprise) + NO_PROXY set + redirects followed (default maxRedirects: 5).

PoC

Self-contained, no network — imports axios's own helper: // node poc.mjs (run next to an axios install) import sbp from './node_modules/axios/lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js'; process.env.NO_PROXY = 'example.com'; for (const n of [5000, 10000, 20000, 40000]) { const url = 'http://' + '.'.repeat(n) + 'a/'; // arrives as an untrusted 302 Location host const t0 = process.hrtime.bigint(); sbp(url); // returns false (correct no-bypass) — but O(N^2) slow console.log(N=${n}: ${(Number(process.hrtime.bigint()-t0)/1e6)|0} ms); } // Measured on 1.18.1: N=5000 ~43ms, 10000 ~160ms, 20000 ~618ms, 40000 ~2499ms; benign host ~0.05ms. Driven through the real http-adapter __setProxy on the redirect path (setProxy(…, isRedirect=true)), a 10 ms timer fires 0 times during the ~2.4 s block at N=40000 — full event-loop starvation.

Impact

Denial of service (event-loop starvation) on any axios client that uses an environment proxy with NO_PROXY set and follows redirects, when a server it contacts returns a crafted redirect Location. No data exposure or RCE. Same impact class as the accepted DoS advisories GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 (toFormData recursion) and the maxContentLength response-size DoS.

Suggested fix

Replace the regex trailing-dot strip with a linear trim: let end = hostname.length; while (end > 0 && hostname.charCodeAt(end - 1) === 46 /* '.' */) end--; hostname = hostname.slice(0, end); Also drop the redundant second /.+$/ pass in PR #11029's normalizeIPAddress.

</details>


Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
axios
>= 1.15.0, < 1.20.0
1.20.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

axios npm → 1.20.0

npm
npm install axios@1.20.0
yarn
yarn add axios@1.20.0
pnpm
pnpm add axios@1.20.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
  • System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
  • Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
  • Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-44g4-m2mj-wpvx
Axios: CIDR-form NO_PROXY entries are ignored, causing proxy exclusion bypass for internal IP ranges
Medium Also affects axios
GHSA-x97p-jq2g-jp4f
Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadget in axios toFormData Options
High Also affects axios
GHSA-vh66-26gq-q6x8
Axios: Prototype pollution gadget in fetch adapter can alter outbound requests
Medium Also affects axios
GHSA-r4gj-5m52-g5wh
Axios: maxRedirects: 0 is not enforced by the fetch adapter, allowing redirect-based SSRF
High Also affects axios
GHSA-m8m8-qj5v-23w3
Axios: Node HTTP adapter prototype-pollution gadget allows request socket hijack via inherited createConnection
High Also affects axios
GHSA-j8rh-479h-cp32
Axios: Header Injection via Inherited headers After Minimal Interceptor
Medium Also affects axios
GHSA-c29m-xwm3-cm6r
Axios: ReDoS in fromDataURI data: URL parser freezes the Node event loop (DoS)
High Also affects axios
GHSA-9fr6-4gfg-395g
Axios: Prototype-Pollution Gadget in the Default Instance Allows Inherited Object.prototype.method to Override HTTP Method
Medium Also affects axios
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor