Skip to content

GHSA-x9w5-xccw-5h9w CVE-2026-35179

AVideo: Unauthenticated Instagram Graph API Proxy via publishInstagram.json.php

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.21%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 11.95% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The SocialMediaPublisher plugin exposes a publishInstagram.json.php endpoint that acts as an unauthenticated proxy to the Facebook/Instagram Graph API. The endpoint accepts user-controlled parameters including an access token, container ID, and Instagram account ID, and passes them directly to the Graph API via InstagramUploader::publishMediaIfIsReady(). This allows any unauthenticated user to make arbitrary Graph API calls through the server, potentially using stolen tokens or abusing the platform's own credentials.

Details

At plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/publishInstagram.json.php:14, the endpoint passes request parameters directly to the Instagram Graph API without any authentication check:

InstagramUploader::publishMediaIfIsReady(
    $_REQUEST['accessToken'],
    $_REQUEST['containerId'],
    $_REQUEST['instagramAccountId']
);

There is no call to User::isLogged(), User::isAdmin(), or any other authorization check before processing the request.

In contrast, sibling endpoints in the same plugin enforce proper authorization:

  • uploadVideo.json.php requires User::isLogged()
  • refresh.json.php requires User::isAdmin()

The endpoint was confirmed accessible on a live instance: it returns a Graph API error response, demonstrating that it processes the request and forwards it to Facebook's servers.

Proof of Concept

  1. Send a request to the endpoint without any authentication:
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/publishInstagram.json.php" \
  -d "accessToken=TEST_TOKEN&containerId=TEST_CONTAINER&instagramAccountId=TEST_ACCOUNT"
  1. The server forwards the request to the Facebook Graph API. With invalid parameters, it returns a Graph API error confirming the endpoint is functional:
{
  "error": {
    "message": "Invalid OAuth access token.",
    "type": "OAuthException",
    "code": 190
  }
}
  1. With a valid access token (e.g., one leaked from AVI-027), an attacker could publish content to the platform's Instagram account:
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/publishInstagram.json.php" \
  -d "accessToken=LEAKED_ACCESS_TOKEN&containerId=REAL_CONTAINER_ID&instagramAccountId=REAL_ACCOUNT_ID"
  1. Verify that sibling endpoints require authentication:
# Should require login
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/uploadVideo.json.php"

# Should require admin
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/refresh.json.php"

Impact

The unauthenticated endpoint allows any attacker to use the AVideo server as a proxy for Instagram/Facebook Graph API calls. When combined with credentials leaked from AVI-027 (unauthenticated access to social media API credentials), an attacker can publish, modify, or delete content on the platform's Instagram account without any authentication to the AVideo instance. The server's IP address is used for the API calls, which could also be used to bypass rate limits or IP-based restrictions on the Graph API.

  • CWE-862: Missing Authorization
  • Severity: Medium

Recommended Fix

Add an admin authorization check at the top of plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/publishInstagram.json.php:10, consistent with the sibling refresh.json.php endpoint:

// plugin/SocialMediaPublisher/publishInstagram.json.php:10
if(!User::isAdmin()){
    die(json_encode(['error'=>'Not authorized']));
}

This restricts the endpoint to admin users only, matching the authorization level of refresh.json.php and preventing unauthenticated proxy abuse.


Found by aisafe.io

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor