Skip to content

GHSA-wrf9-r3h7-7x5v CVE-2026-24451 GO-2026-6081

Gitea: Fork Synchronization Continues After Parent Repository Changes from Public to Private

High Go
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.45%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.03% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
1.26.3
Upgrade code.gitea.io/gitea to this version or later

Description

Summary

The POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/merge-upstream endpoint continues to synchronize commits from a parent repository after the parent repository has been changed from public to private.

A fork created while the parent repository was public can still receive commits made after the parent repository becomes private. As a result, content added during the private period becomes available through the fork repository after synchronization.

Details

Gitea provides the merge-upstream API to synchronize a fork with its parent repository.

A typical workflow is:

  1. A repository is public.
  2. Another user creates a fork.
  3. The fork owner uses merge-upstream to receive updates from the parent repository.

However, if the parent repository is later changed from public to private, the synchronization endpoint continues to import new commits from the parent repository into the fork.

In testing on Gitea 1.26.2, a fork owner who can no longer directly access the parent repository is still able to synchronize newly created commits from the parent repository into the fork by calling merge-upstream.

As a result, commits created after the visibility change can be propagated into the fork through the normal fork synchronization workflow.

PoC

Proof-of-Concept Code

https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Gitea_PoC-EC93/4_poc_merge_upstream

PoC Details

  1. User alice creates a public repository alice/P.
  2. User bob forks the repository, creating bob/P.
  3. alice changes alice/P from public to private.
  4. Verify that bob can no longer directly access the parent repository:
GET /api/v1/repos/alice/P

Response:

404 Not Found
GET /api/v1/repos/alice/P/contents/README.md

Response:

404 Not Found
  1. While the repository is private, alice commits a new file:
secret.txt
  1. Verify that bob cannot directly access the new file from the parent repository:
GET /api/v1/repos/alice/P/contents/secret.txt

Response:

404 Not Found
  1. bob synchronizes the fork:
POST /api/v1/repos/bob/P/merge-upstream

Response:

200 OK
  1. The newly added file is now available through the fork repository:
GET /api/v1/repos/bob/P/contents/secret.txt

Response:

200 OK

The attached PoC reproduces the behavior end-to-end.

As a control test, attempting to access the private-period commit directly through the fork's Git API before synchronization fails:

GET /api/v1/repos/bob/P/git/commits/<private-period-commit-sha>

Response:

404 Not Found

This indicates that the commit becomes available in the fork only after the merge-upstream operation synchronizes it from the parent repository.

Impact

A fork created while a repository is public can continue receiving updates from the parent repository after the parent repository is changed to private.

Consequently, content committed after the visibility change may become available through fork synchronization even when the fork owner can no longer directly access the parent repository.

The impact is limited to content that is synchronized from the parent repository into the affected fork. The issue does not allow modification of the parent repository or access to repositories that were never forked.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
code.gitea.io/gitea
< 1.26.3
1.26.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

code.gitea.io/gitea Go → 1.26.3

go
go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.26.3 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m
Gitea: Remote Code Execution via diffpatch Git Hook Installation
Critical Known exploited Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-fq2p-5p22-8g6j
Gitea: Public-Only Personal access tokens scope bypass in Organization and Permission Endpoints
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-2wm4-vwp6-v7xc
Gitea: SSRF via Migration Asset Downloads Bypasses hostmatcher — Reads Internal Files and Cloud Metadata
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-3r5c-2xxx-h872
Gitea: Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API
Low Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-frpw-3h2q-4jj6
Gitea: Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
Gitea: GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp ClearRepoWatches fix not applied to API EditRepo path — sister code path retains stale watches on public->private
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2
Gitea: Two SSRF findings
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3
Gitea: ParseAcceptLanguage quadratic-time DoS via Locale middleware on unauthenticated requests
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor