Skip to content

GHSA-wfcc-pff6-rgc5 CVE-2017-9735

Jetty vulnerable to exposure of sensitive information due to observable discrepancy

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
5.79%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 93.12% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-203 Observable Discrepancy
Fix
9.4.6.v20170531
Upgrade org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server to this version or later

Description

Jetty through 9.4.x contains a timing channel attack in util/security/Password.java, which allows attackers to obtain access by observing elapsed times before rejection of incorrect passwords.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.6.v20170531
9.4.6.v20170531
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.20.v20170531
9.3.20.v20170531
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
< 9.2.22.v20170606
9.2.22.v20170606

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server Maven → 9.4.6.v20170531

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId><artifactId>jetty-server</artifactId><version>9.4.6.v20170531</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server:9.4.6.v20170531")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7p3p-8qv8-m2vh
Eclipse Jetty: HTTP Authority/Host mismatch
Medium Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-f4v5-65jj-pcr2
Eclipse Jetty: Cross-Request Leakage for trailers on HTTP/1.1 keep-alive connections
High Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-9299-c6m4-mjhc
Eclipse Jetty: DoS attack triggering OutOfMemory with 100-Continue requests
High Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-xxh7-fcf3-rj7f
The Eclipse Jetty Server Artifact has a Gzip request memory leak
High Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-q4rv-gq96-w7c5
**UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** GzipHandler causes part of request body to be seen as request body of a separate request
High Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-g8m5-722r-8whq
Eclipse Jetty's ThreadLimitHandler.getRemote() vulnerable to remote DoS attacks
Medium Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-p26g-97m4-6q7c
Eclipse Jetty's cookie parsing of quoted values can exfiltrate values from other cookies
Medium Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
GHSA-qw69-rqj8-6qw8
OutOfMemoryError for large multipart without filename in Eclipse Jetty
Medium Also affects org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor