Skip to content

GHSA-vwp5-f99x-x3rq CVE-2026-106506

Backstage has improper input validation in scaffolder task list ordering

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.22%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 12.28% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-202 Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Data Queries
CWE-203 Observable Discrepancy
Fix
4.1.0
Upgrade @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend to this version or later

Description

Impact

An authenticated Backstage user with permission to create and read relevant scaffolder tasks may be able to infer confidential task data under specific conditions. Successful exploitation requires retained task secrets, visibility of a target task, knowledge of the secret structure, and repeated requests.

Patches

Patched in @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend version 4.1.0

Workarounds

  • At the gateway or reverse proxy, reject task-list requests that specify custom ordering, or allow ordering only by created_at, status, and created_by.
  • Restrict scaffolder task creation and task read permissions to trusted users, preferably using owner-based task-read conditions.
  • Disabling task recovery can reduce secret retention after a task is claimed, but it does not protect secrets in queued tasks and should not be treated as complete mitigation.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
< 4.1.0
4.1.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend npm → 4.1.0

npm
npm install @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@4.1.0
yarn
yarn add @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@4.1.0
pnpm
pnpm add @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@4.1.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-202: Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Data Queries

When trying to keep information confidential, an attacker can often infer some of the information by using statistics.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: This is a complex topic. See the [REF-1492] for a good discussion of best practices.

CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-4xvq-3m68-h444
Backstage has sensitive information exposure in scaffolder task logs
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-hmp2-4m7g-22cv
Backstage: Scaffolder action input authorization bypass
High Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-95p4-vv4g-jxxm
Backstage may expose sensitive information in Scaffolder task failure events
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-g2v8-7jhw-pp8p
Backstage: Sensitive information exposure in Scaffolder
Critical Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-xvgh-hmx8-9xxf
Backstage: Improper task state validation in Scaffolder backend
High Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-mfvq-x7vr-rgqg
Backstage: Secret-derived values may be exposed in scaffolder task logs
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-29gx-h2m3-xw44
Backstage's scaffolder credential handling may allow unintended GitHub authentication fallback
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-7hfw-grcm-cqm6
Backstage: Incorrect authorization in scaffolder task listing
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor