Skip to content

GHSA-g2v8-7jhw-pp8p CVE-2026-106501

Backstage: Sensitive information exposure in Scaffolder

Critical npm
Severity
9.6 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.48%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.70% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-201 Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
Fix
3.3.1
Upgrade @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend to this version or later

Description

Impact

An authenticated Backstage user who can read another user's Scaffolder task may receive internal execution data. In deployments where that data contains credentials for an external service, this may permit disclosure and unauthorized changes in that external service.

Patches

Patched in @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend version 4.1.0

Workarounds

  • Configure scaffolder.task.read with the isTaskOwner condition so users can only read tasks they created.
  • Restrict affected integrations and workflows to trusted operators until an upgrade is available.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
< 3.3.1
3.3.1
@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.1
3.4.1
@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.3
4.0.3
@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
>= 4.0.4, < 4.1.0
4.1.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend npm → 3.3.1

npm
npm install @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@3.3.1
yarn
yarn add @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@3.3.1
pnpm
pnpm add @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend@3.3.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data

The code transmits data to another actor, but a portion of the data includes sensitive information that should not be accessible to that actor.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Specify which data in the software should be regarded as sensitive. Consider which types of users should have access to which types of data.
  • Implementation: Ensure that any possibly sensitive data specified in the requirements is verified with designers to ensure that it is either a calculated risk or mitigated elsewhere. Any information that is not necessary to the functionality should be removed in order to lower both the overhead and the possibility of security sensitive data being sent.
  • System Configuration: Setup default error messages so that unexpected errors do not disclose sensitive information.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vwp5-f99x-x3rq
Backstage has improper input validation in scaffolder task list ordering
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-4xvq-3m68-h444
Backstage has sensitive information exposure in scaffolder task logs
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-hmp2-4m7g-22cv
Backstage: Scaffolder action input authorization bypass
High Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-95p4-vv4g-jxxm
Backstage may expose sensitive information in Scaffolder task failure events
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-xvgh-hmx8-9xxf
Backstage: Improper task state validation in Scaffolder backend
High Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-mfvq-x7vr-rgqg
Backstage: Secret-derived values may be exposed in scaffolder task logs
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-29gx-h2m3-xw44
Backstage's scaffolder credential handling may allow unintended GitHub authentication fallback
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
GHSA-7hfw-grcm-cqm6
Backstage: Incorrect authorization in scaffolder task listing
Medium Also affects @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor