Skip to content

GHSA-rjxg-rpg3-9r89 CVE-2023-46125 PYSEC-2026-1347

Fides Information Disclosure Vulnerability in Config API Endpoint

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.92%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 60.27% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
2.22.1
Upgrade ethyca-fides to this version or later

Description

Impact

The Fides webserver API allows users to retrieve its configuration using the GET api/v1/config endpoint. The configuration data is filtered to suppress most sensitive configuration information before it is returned to the user, but even the filtered data contains information about the internals and the backend infrastructure, such as various settings, servers’ addresses and ports and database username. This information is useful for administrative users as well as attackers, thus it should not be revealed to low-privileged users.

This vulnerability allows Admin UI users with roles lower than the owner role e.g. the viewer role to retrieve the config information using the API.

Patches

The vulnerability has been patched in Fides version 2.22.1. Users are advised to upgrade to this version or later to secure their systems against this threat.

Workarounds

There are no workarounds.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
ethyca-fides
< 2.22.1
2.22.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

ethyca-fides PyPI → 2.22.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "ethyca-fides>=2.22.1"
poetry
poetry add "ethyca-fides>=2.22.1"
uv
uv add "ethyca-fides>=2.22.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-5qrq-9645-g5g2
ethyca-fides has a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via fides_description override
High Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-qx5f-ghc2-7g5c
Ethyca Fides has a Privacy Request Identity Verification Bypass Vulnerability via Duplicate Detection
Medium Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-hjfh-p8f5-24wr
Fides Webserver API is Vulnerable to OAuth Client Privilege Escalation
High Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-fq34-xw6c-fphf
Fides Webserver API Rate Limiting Vulnerability in Proxied Environments
High Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-7q62-r88r-j5gw
Fides has a Lack of Brute-Force Protections on Authentication Endpoints
Medium Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-rpw8-82v9-3q87
Fides' Admin UI User Password Change Does Not Invalidate Current Session
Medium Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-v7vm-rhmg-8j2r
Password Policy Bypass Vulnerability in Fides Webserver User Accept Invite API
High Also affects ethyca-fides
GHSA-c34r-238x-f7qx
Remote Code Execution Vulnerability via SSTI in Fides Webserver Jinja Email Templating Engine
High Also affects ethyca-fides
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor