GHSA-q6jj-r49p-94fh CVE-2026-34369
AVideo has Video Password Protection Bypass via API Endpoints Returning Full Playback Sources Without Password Verification
- Severity
- 5.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.39%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.22% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Summary
The get_api_video_file and get_api_video API endpoints in AVideo return full video playback sources (direct MP4 URLs, HLS manifests) for password-protected videos without verifying the video password. While the normal web playback flow enforces password checks via the CustomizeUser::getModeYouTube() hook, this enforcement is completely absent from the API code path. An unauthenticated attacker can retrieve direct playback URLs for any password-protected video by calling the API directly.
Details
The video password protection is enforced in the web UI via CustomizeUser::getModeYouTube() (plugin/CustomizeUser/CustomizeUser.php:787), which calls videoPasswordIsGood() before rendering the video player. However, this hook is only invoked during web page rendering — the API endpoints bypass it entirely.
Vulnerable endpoint 1 — get_api_video_file (plugin/API/API.php:986-1004):
public function get_api_video_file($parameters)
{
global $global;
$obj = $this->startResponseObject($parameters);
$obj->videos_id = $parameters['videos_id'];
if (!self::isAPISecretValid()) {
if (!User::canWatchVideoWithAds($obj->videos_id)) {
return new ApiObject("You cannot watch this video");
}
}
$video = new Video('', '', $obj->videos_id);
$obj->filename = $video->getFilename();
// ...
$obj->video_file = Video::getHigherVideoPathFromID($obj->videos_id);
$obj->sources = getSources($obj->filename, true);
return new ApiObject("", false, $obj);
}
The only access check is User::canWatchVideoWithAds() (objects/user.php:1102-1159), which checks admin status, video active status, owner status, and plugin-level restrictions (subscription/PPV). It does not check video_password. Password-protected videos have status 'a' (active), which passes all checks.
Vulnerable endpoint 2 — get_api_video (plugin/API/API.php:1635-1810):
This endpoint returns video metadata including full videos paths (line 1759) and sources arrays (line 1785) for all videos in query results, with no password verification anywhere in the function.
The intended password check exists but is never called from these endpoints:
Video::verifyVideoPassword() (objects/video.php:543-553) is the proper password verification function, and get_api_video_password_is_correct exists as a separate API endpoint — proving password verification was intended as an access control. But neither get_api_video_file nor get_api_video invoke any password check.
PoC
# Step 1: Identify a password-protected video via the video list API
curl -s 'https://target.com/plugin/API/get.json.php?APIName=video&rowCount=50' | \
python3 -c "
import json, sys
data = json.load(sys.stdin)
for v in data.get('response',{}).get('rows',[]):
if v.get('video_password'):
print(f'ID: {v[\"id\"]}, Title: {v[\"title\"]}, Password Protected: YES')
print(f' Direct sources: {json.dumps(v.get(\"sources\",[])[0] if v.get(\"sources\") else \"none\")}')"
# Step 2: Retrieve full playback sources for the password-protected video
curl -s 'https://target.com/plugin/API/get.json.php?APIName=video_file&videos_id=<PROTECTED_VIDEO_ID>'
# Expected: access denied or password prompt
# Actual: full response with direct MP4/HLS URLs:
# {"error":false,"response":{"videos_id":"123","filename":"video_abc",
# "video_file":"https://target.com/videos/video_abc/video_abc_HD.mp4",
# "sources":[{"src":"https://target.com/videos/video_abc/video_abc_HD.mp4","type":"video/mp4"}]}}
# Step 3: Download the protected video directly
curl -O 'https://target.com/videos/video_abc/video_abc_HD.mp4'
Impact
Any unauthenticated user can retrieve direct playable video URLs for all password-protected videos, completely bypassing the password requirement. The get_api_video endpoint additionally exposes which videos are password-protected (via the video_password field set to '1'), allowing targeted enumeration. This renders the video_password feature ineffective for any content accessible through the API, which includes mobile apps, third-party integrations, and direct API consumers.
Recommended Fix
Add password verification to both API endpoints before returning video sources. In plugin/API/API.php:
public function get_api_video_file($parameters)
{
global $global;
$obj = $this->startResponseObject($parameters);
$obj->videos_id = $parameters['videos_id'];
if (!self::isAPISecretValid()) {
if (!User::canWatchVideoWithAds($obj->videos_id)) {
return new ApiObject("You cannot watch this video");
}
// Check video password protection
$video = new Video('', '', $obj->videos_id);
$storedPassword = $video->getVideo_password();
if (!empty($storedPassword)) {
$providedPassword = @$parameters['video_password'];
if (empty($providedPassword) || !Video::verifyVideoPassword($providedPassword, $storedPassword)) {
return new ApiObject("Video password required", true);
}
}
}
// ... rest of function
}
Apply the same check in get_api_video() before populating the videos and sources fields (around line 1759), replacing source data with an empty object when the password is not provided or incorrect. Also fix get_api_video_password_is_correct to use Video::verifyVideoPassword() instead of direct == comparison (line 1126), which currently fails for bcrypt hashes.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| wwbn/avideo | <= 26.0 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35 WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin | Critical | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor