Skip to content

GHSA-ppx5-q359-pvwj CVE-2024-32481 PYSEC-2024-246

vyper's range(start, start + N) reverts for negative numbers

Medium PyPI
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.80%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 56.53% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-681 Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types
Fix
0.4.0
Upgrade vyper to this version or later

Description

Summary

When looping over a range of the form range(start, start + N), if start is negative, the execution will always revert.

Details

This issue is caused by an incorrect assertion inserted by the code generation of the range (stmt.parse_For_range()):

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/9136169468f317a53b4e7448389aa315f90b95ba/vyper/codegen/stmt.py#L286-L287

This assertion was introduced in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/3de1415ee77a9244eb04bdb695e249d3ec9ed868 to fix https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6r8q-pfpv-7cgj. The issue arises when start is signed, instead of using sle, le is used and start is interpreted as an unsigned integer for the comparison. If it is a negative number, its 255th bit is set to 1 and is hence interpreted as a very large unsigned integer making the assertion always fail.

PoC

@external
def foo():
    x:int256 = min_value(int256)
    # revert when it should not since we have the following assertion that fails:
    # [assert, [le, min_value(int256), max_value(int256) + 1 - 10]],
    for i in range(x, x + 10):
        pass

Patches

patched in v0.4.0, specifically, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3679 disallows this form of range().

Impact

Any contract having a range(start, start + N) where start is a signed integer with the possibility for start to be negative is affected. If a call goes through the loop while supplying a negative start the execution will revert.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
vyper
>= 0.3.8, < 0.4.0
0.4.0
vyper
>= 0.3.8, < 0.4.0b1
0.4.0b1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

vyper PyPI → 0.4.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "vyper>=0.4.0"
poetry
poetry add "vyper>=0.4.0"
uv
uv add "vyper>=0.4.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-681: Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types

When converting from one data type to another, such as long to integer, data can be omitted or translated in a way that produces unexpected values. If the resulting values are used in a sensitive context, then dangerous behaviors may occur.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Avoid making conversion between numeric types. Always check for the allowed ranges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf
Vyper: Memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls
Medium Also affects vyper
GHSA-4v7v-gqf9-ww2g
Vyper: Call stack corruption when passing complex type containing non-base type members as argument
Medium Also affects vyper
GHSA-vg88-3v92-rjx2
Vyper: Return inside for loop more than 1 level deep
Low Also affects vyper
GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Low Also affects vyper
GHSA-qhr6-mgqr-mchm
Vyper's `concat()` builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments
Low Also affects vyper
GHSA-h33q-mhmp-8p67
Vyper has a double eval in For List Iter
High Also affects vyper
GHSA-4w26-8p97-f4jp
AugAssign evaluation order causing OOB write within the object in Vyper
Critical Also affects vyper
GHSA-2p94-8669-xg86
Vyper's sqrt doesn't define rounding behavior
High Also affects vyper
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor