Skip to content

GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm CVE-2025-47774 PYSEC-2026-2028

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Low PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Low · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.48%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.36% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-691 Insufficient Control Flow Management
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

counter: public(uint256)

@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
    b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
    return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.counter += 1
    return 0

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
vyper
<= 0.4.2rc1
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

Weakness

CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management

The code does not sufficiently manage its control flow during execution, creating conditions in which the control flow can be modified in unexpected ways.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf
Vyper: Memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls
Medium Also affects vyper
GHSA-4v7v-gqf9-ww2g
Vyper: Call stack corruption when passing complex type containing non-base type members as argument
Medium Also affects vyper
GHSA-vg88-3v92-rjx2
Vyper: Return inside for loop more than 1 level deep
Low Also affects vyper
GHSA-qhr6-mgqr-mchm
Vyper's `concat()` builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments
Low Also affects vyper
GHSA-h33q-mhmp-8p67
Vyper has a double eval in For List Iter
High Also affects vyper
GHSA-4w26-8p97-f4jp
AugAssign evaluation order causing OOB write within the object in Vyper
Critical Also affects vyper
GHSA-2p94-8669-xg86
Vyper's sqrt doesn't define rounding behavior
High Also affects vyper
GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3
Vyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls
High Also affects vyper
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor