Skip to content

GHSA-pmjh-fq2x-6v4x CVE-2026-18149

undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via orphaned RetryHandler response body

Medium npm
Severity
5.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.48%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.50% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-772 Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
Fix
7.29.1
Upgrade undici to this version or later

Description

Impact

undici's RetryHandler can leave a response body pending indefinitely. When a retried request receives a non-retryable response after a truncated one, the original response.body held by the application is never settled, so reads such as response.body.text() hang and bodyTimeout does not fire. A malicious server can repeat this to accumulate pending promises and streams, leading to denial of service.

Patches

Patched in undici v7.29.1 and v8.10.2.

Workarounds

Impose an independent request deadline and destroy the response body when it expires. bodyTimeout alone does not prevent this.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
undici
>= 7.11.0, < 7.29.1
7.29.1
undici
>= 8.0.0, < 8.10.2
8.10.2
undici
>= 7.11.0, < 7.29.1
7.29.1
undici
>= 8.0.0, < 8.10.2
8.10.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

undici npm → 7.29.1

npm
npm install undici@7.29.1
yarn
yarn add undici@7.29.1
pnpm
pnpm add undici@7.29.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.9

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, languages such as Java, Ruby, and Lisp perform automatic garbage collection that releases memory for objects that have been deallocated.
  • Implementation: It is good practice to be responsible for freeing all resources you allocate and to be consistent with how and where you free resources in a function. If you allocate resources that you intend to free upon completion of the function, you must be sure to free the resources at all exit points for that function including error conditions.
  • Operation, Architecture and Design: Use resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems. When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users. Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unhandled exception in the decompress interceptor
High Also affects undici
GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via TLS 1.2 certificate-changing renegotiation
High Also affects undici
GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6
undici WebSocket client vulnerable to Denial of Service via unbounded automatic PONG buffering
High Also affects undici
GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unbounded memory in the EventSource parser
High Also affects undici
GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unhandled error on excessive content-encodings
High Also affects undici
GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472
undici vulnerable to Subresource Integrity bypass via non-lowercase algorithm tokens
High Also affects undici
GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26
undici vulnerable to cache poisoning and cross-user disclosure via cross-origin redirects
Critical Also affects undici
GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped tls options in Agent
Critical Also affects undici

Credits: UlisesGascon, mcollina, samuel871211

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor