Skip to content

GHSA-pg64-r7rr-phv8 CVE-2019-14433 PYSEC-2019-191

OpenStack Nova Server Resource Faults Leak External Exception Details

Medium PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.94%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 80.15% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Fix
17.0.12
Upgrade nova to this version or later

Description

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova before 17.0.12, 18.x before 18.2.2, and 19.x before 19.0.2. If an API request from an authenticated user ends in a fault condition due to an external exception, details of the underlying environment may be leaked in the response, and could include sensitive configuration or other data.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nova
< 17.0.12
17.0.12
nova
>= 18.0.0, < 18.2.2
18.2.2
nova
>= 19.0.0, < 19.0.2
19.0.2
nova
>= 19.0.0, < 19.0.2
< 17.0.12
>= 18.0.0, < 18.2.2
17.0.12
18.2.2
19.0.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nova PyPI → 17.0.12

pip
pip install --upgrade "nova>=17.0.12"
poetry
poetry add "nova>=17.0.12"
uv
uv add "nova>=17.0.12"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information

The product generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
  • Implementation: Handle exceptions internally and do not display errors containing potentially sensitive information to a user.
  • Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • System Configuration: Where available, configure the environment to use less verbose error messages. For example, in PHP, disable the display_errors setting during configuration, or at runtime using the error_reporting() function.
  • System Configuration: Create default error pages or messages that do not leak any information.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-mfg3-p6m3-gjgr
OpenStack Nova: Nova scheduler hint injection bypasses Placement resource claims and scheduling constraints
High Also affects nova
GHSA-m4f3-qp2w-gwh6
OpenStack Nova calls qemu-img without format restrictions for resize
High Also affects nova
GHSA-rm86-h44c-2r2m
OpenStack Nova vulnerable to unauthorized access to potentially sensitive data
Medium Also affects nova
GHSA-r4v4-w9pv-6fph
OpenStack Cinder, Glance, and Nova vulnerable to arbitrary file access
Medium Also affects nova
GHSA-7h75-hwxx-qpgc
OpenStack Cinder, glance, and Nova vulnerable to Path Traversal
Medium Also affects nova
GHSA-v725-c588-h936
OpenStack Nova Changing vnic_type breaks compute service restart
Low Also affects nova
GHSA-22jm-4hxw-35jf
OpenStack Nova can leak consoleauth token into log files
Low Also affects nova
GHSA-43cm-73px-5v4m
OpenStack Compute (Nova) Resource limit circumvention in Nova private flavors
Low Also affects nova
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor