GHSA-mjqp-26hc-grxg CVE-2025-10156 PYSEC-2025-152
Picklescan: ZIP archive scan bypass is possible through non-exhaustive Cyclic Redundancy Check
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 1.48%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 73.95% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
0.0.31- Upgrade picklescan to this version or later
Description
Summary
Picklescan's ability to scan ZIP archives for malicious pickle files is compromised when the archive contains a file with a bad Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC). Instead of attempting to scan the files within the archive, whatever the CRC is, Picklescan fails in error and returns no results. This allows attackers to potentially hide malicious pickle payloads within ZIP archives that PyTorch might still be able to load (as PyTorch often disables CRC checks).
Details
Picklescan likely utilizes Python's built-in zipfile module to handle ZIP archives. When zipfile encounters a file within an archive that has a mismatch between the declared CRC and the calculated CRC, it can raise an exception (e.g., BadZipFile or a related error). It appears that Picklescan does not try to scan the files whatever the CRC is. This behavior contrasts with PyTorch's model loading capabilities, which in many cases might bypass CRC checks for ZIP archives - whatever the configuration is. This discrepancy creates a blind spot where a malicious model packaged in a ZIP with a bad CRC could be loaded by PyTorch while being completely missed by Picklescan.
PoC
- Download an existing Pytorch model with a bad CRC
wget <https://huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en/resolve/main/pytorch_model.bin?download=true> -O pytorch_model.bin
- Attempt to scan the corrupted ZIP file with PickleScan:
# Assuming you have Picklescan installed and in your PATH
picklescan -p pytorch_model.bin
Screenshot 2025-06-29 at 13 52 07 Observed Result: Picklescan returns no results and presents an error message indicating a problem with the ZIP file, but it doesn’t attempt to scan any potentially valid pickle files within the archive.
Expected Result: Picklescan should either:
- Attempt to extract and scan other valid files within the ZIP archive, even if some have CRC errors.
- Report a warning indicating that the ZIP archive has CRC errors and might be incomplete or corrupted, but still attempt to scan any accessible content.
Impact
Severity: High Affected Users: Any organization or individual using Picklescan to analyze PyTorch models or other files distributed as ZIP archives for malicious pickle content. Impact Details: Attackers can craft malicious PyTorch models containing embedded pickle payloads, package them into ZIP archives, and intentionally introduce CRC errors. This would cause Picklescan to fail to analyze the archive, while PyTorch is still able to load the model (depending on its configuration regarding CRC checks). This creates a significant vulnerability where malicious code can be distributed and potentially executed without detection by Picklescan. Ex: Picklescan on HuggingFace goes into error (https://huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en/tree/main) Screenshot 2025-06-29 at 13 55 58
Recommendations: Picklescan should not fail on Bad CRC check, especially if Pytorch is not checking CRC. Relaxed Zipfile is perfect to fix this issue:
--- picklescan/src/picklescan/relaxed_zipfile.py
+++ picklescan/src/picklescan/relaxed_zipfile.py
@@ class RelaxedZipFile(zipfile.ZipFile):
try:
# Skip the file header:
fheader = zef_file.read(sizeFileHeader)
if len(fheader) != sizeFileHeader:
raise zipfile.BadZipFile("Truncated file header")
fheader = struct.unpack(structFileHeader, fheader)
if fheader[_FH_SIGNATURE] != stringFileHeader:
raise zipfile.BadZipFile("Bad magic number for file header")
zef_file.read(fheader[_FH_FILENAME_LENGTH])
if fheader[_FH_EXTRA_FIELD_LENGTH]:
zef_file.read(fheader[_FH_EXTRA_FIELD_LENGTH])
- return zipfile.ZipExtFile(zef_file, mode, zinfo, pwd, True)
+
+ # Create the ZipExtFile and disable CRC check
+ ext_file = zipfile.ZipExtFile(zef_file, mode, zinfo, pwd)
+ # Monkey-patch to skip CRC validation
+ ext_file._expected_crc = None
+ return ext_file
except BaseException:
zef_file.close()
raise
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| picklescan | < 0.0.31 |
0.0.31 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
picklescan PyPI → 0.0.31
- pip
pip install --upgrade "picklescan>=0.0.31"- poetry
poetry add "picklescan>=0.0.31"- uv
uv add "picklescan>=0.0.31"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles an exceptional condition.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-mjqp-26hc-grxg
- github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/28a7b4ef753466572bda3313737116eeb9b4e5c5
- github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/blob/v0.0.29/src/picklescan/relaxed_zipfile.py
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/picklescan/PYSEC-2025-152.yaml
- huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en/resolve/main/pytorch_model.bin
- huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en/tree/main
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-g38g-8gr9-h9xp PickleScan has multiple stdlib modules with direct RCE not in blocklist | Critical | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-vvpj-8cmc-gx39 PickleScan's pkgutil.resolve_name has a universal blocklist bypass | Critical | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass | Critical | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-97f8-7cmv-76j2 Picklescan (scan_pytorch) Bypass via dynamic eval MAGIC_NUMBER | High | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-m7j5-r2p5-c39r picklescan vulnerable to arbitrary file create using logging.FileHandler | Medium | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-9m3x-qqw2-h32h picklescan missing detection by simple obfuscation of a `builtins.eval` call | Critical | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-9726-w42j-3qjr picklescan has Arbitrary file read using `io.FileIO` | High | Also affects picklescan |
| GHSA-46h3-79wf-xr6c Picklescan is vulnerable to RCE via missing detection when calling built-in python _operator.attrgetter | High | Also affects picklescan |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor