Skip to content

GHSA-jxcw-qp4h-6jfq CVE-2026-57146 PYSEC-2026-3515

PraisonAI A2U incomplete authentication fix leaves current serve command unauthenticated by default

High PyPI
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.18% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
4.6.61
Upgrade praisonai to this version or later

Description

Summary

The published A2U advisory GHSA-f292-66h9-fpmf says unauthenticated A2U event streaming was fixed in praisonai 4.5.115. Current head still exposes the same A2U subscription and event routes without authentication when the operator starts the documented CLI entrypoint:

praisonai serve a2u --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8002

The current CLI wrapper does not expose --api-key, does not install the common API-key middleware, and does not generate a token for A2U. It calls create_a2u_routes(app) directly. That helper only enforces auth if A2U_AUTH_TOKEN is already present; if the variable is missing, _authenticate_request() returns None and treats auth as disabled.

This is an incomplete-fix report for the published A2U issue, not a separate trust-model-only concern.

Technical Details

The Typer command for A2U accepts only --host and --port:

src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:570-585

It forwards only those values to the shared serve handler:

args = ["a2u", "--host", host, "--port", str(port)]

The serve handler for A2U likewise accepts only host and port, then creates the app:

src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:802-817

_create_a2u_app() registers A2U routes directly:

src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:827-853

No call to _install_api_key_middleware(app, ...) is made for the dedicated A2U server, unlike the unified server path.

Inside create_a2u_routes(), auth is opt-in:

src/praisonai/praisonai/endpoints/a2u_server.py:245-253
auth_token = os.environ.get("A2U_AUTH_TOKEN")
if not auth_token:
    # No token configured - auth disabled (development mode)
    return None

The route helper then registers the same sensitive endpoints from the public advisory:

src/praisonai/praisonai/endpoints/a2u_server.py:391-409

Why This Is Not Intended Behavior

The public advisory for GHSA-f292-66h9-fpmf describes unauthenticated /a2u/info, /a2u/subscribe, /a2u/events/{stream_name}, /a2u/events/sub/{id}, and /a2u/health as the vulnerability and lists 4.5.115 as patched.

Current documentation also says PraisonAI API servers are now secure by default, bind to 127.0.0.1, and generate a bearer token if no token is provided. The dedicated A2U command does not implement that secure-by-default behavior. It remains unauthenticated unless a different environment variable, A2U_AUTH_TOKEN, was set before startup.

This report does not claim that explicit local-only development mode is always a vulnerability. The issue is the mismatch between the published fixed version / secure-by-default posture and the current A2U CLI behavior, including external binding via --host 0.0.0.0.

PoV

Run:

python3 poc/pov_poc.py \
  --repo /path/to/PraisonAI \
  --json

Observed current-head output:

{
  "no_token": {
    "info_status_no_auth": 200,
    "subscribe_status_no_auth": 200,
    "health_status_no_auth": 200,
    "subscribe_body": {
      "stream_name": "events",
      "stream_url": "http://testserver/a2u/events/sub-d8ee868a5491"
    }
  },
  "with_token": {
    "info_status_no_auth": 401,
    "subscribe_status_no_auth": 401,
    "info_with_token": 200,
    "subscribe_with_token": 200
  },
  "vulnerable_current_default": true
}

The PoV is local-only. It uses a small Starlette response/route shim so it can invoke the registered A2U handlers without starting a network listener or installing dependencies. The control shows that the route-level token check works when A2U_AUTH_TOKEN is configured; the vulnerable behavior is that the current documented CLI path does not require or generate that token.

PoC

The PoV section above contains the local reproduction command, input, and decisive output.

Impact

An attacker who can reach a current A2U server started without A2U_AUTH_TOKEN can subscribe to agent event streams without credentials. The prior public advisory already classifies the exposed data as agent responses, tool calls, thinking/progress events, and stream metadata.

If operators rely on the published fixed version or the secure-by-default serve documentation, they may expose A2U on a network interface believing the unauthenticated stream issue is fixed.

Severity

Suggested severity: High.

Suggested Fix

Recommended:

  1. Make praisonai serve a2u secure by default in the same way as the documented API servers: generate a bearer token when none is configured, print it to stderr, and enforce it on all non-public A2U endpoints.
  2. Add --api-key / --auth-token support to the dedicated A2U command and pass the configured token into create_a2u_routes() or shared middleware.
  3. Fail closed for external binds such as --host 0.0.0.0 unless authentication is enabled.
  4. Require auth on /a2u/health or remove subscription and stream counts from unauthenticated health responses.
  5. Add regression tests for praisonai serve a2u proving unauthenticated /a2u/subscribe returns 401 on current/fixed versions by default.

Affected Package/Versions

  • Repository: MervinPraison/PraisonAI
  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Package: praisonai
  • Component: A2U Agent-to-User event stream server
  • Current checkout validated: 2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1
  • Current checkout tag state: v4.6.57-4-g2f9677ab
  • Public prior advisory: GHSA-f292-66h9-fpmf, fixed range claims praisonai <= 4.5.114

Suggested affected range:

pip:praisonai >= 4.5.115, <= 4.6.58

If maintainers prefer to update the public advisory rather than create a new advisory, the important correction is that the fixed version/range should not mark the current praisonai serve a2u behavior as fixed.

Advisory History

This is intentionally adjacent to GHSA-f292-66h9-fpmf. The report-grade point is that current versions after the claimed patched version still reproduce the same default unauthenticated A2U behavior through the maintained CLI entrypoint.

Visible PraisonAI advisories and prior submissions were checked. None cover A2U incomplete authentication after GHSA-f292-66h9-fpmf.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
praisonai
>= 4.5.115, < 4.6.61
4.6.61

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

praisonai PyPI → 4.6.61

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.6.61"
poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.6.61"
uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.6.61"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr
PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg
PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92)
Critical Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc
PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv
PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2
PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj
PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9
PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation
Medium Also affects praisonai
GHSA-rg5q-pp8p-f7jm
PraisonAI: Webhook SSRF via DNS fail-open in `JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url()` — bypass of CVE-2026-40114
High Also affects praisonai
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor