Skip to content

GHSA-jw8g-5j46-44rp CVE-2026-43877

AVideo: CSRF in userSavePhoto.php Allows Cross-Origin Overwrite of Authenticated Users' Profile Photos with Arbitrary Content

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.14%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 3.38% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

objects/userSavePhoto.php is a legacy profile-photo endpoint that accepts a base64 POST parameter and writes the decoded bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<users_id>.png. Its only access control is User::isLogged(). It does not end in .json.php, so it is excluded from the project's global autoCSRFGuard (which is suffix-scoped in objects/include_config.php). There is no CSRF token, no Origin/Referer check, and no MIME validation of the decoded bytes. Because AVideo's default cookie policy is SameSite=None; Secure on HTTPS (objects/functionsPHP.php:227), an attacker who lures a logged-in user to a malicious page can overwrite that user's profile photo with arbitrary bytes and also triggers a site-wide clearCache(true) on every forged request.

Details

Handler (objects/userSavePhoto.php, 51 lines total):

// line 12 - only access control
if (!User::isLogged()) {
    $obj->msg = __("You must be logged");
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
// ...
// line 29 - unvalidated base64 from POST
$fileData = base64DataToImage($_POST['imgBase64']);
// line 30 - deterministic filename tied to the VICTIM's session
$fileName = 'photo'. User::getId().'.png';
$photoURL = $imagePath.$fileName;
// line 35 - raw bytes written to disk
$bytes = file_put_contents($global['systemRootPath'].$photoURL, $fileData);
// lines 43-48 - DB update + global cache invalidation unconditionally
$user = new User(User::getId());
$user->setPhotoURL($photoURL);
if ($user->save()) {
    User::deleteOGImage(User::getId());
    User::updateSessionInfo();
    clearCache(true);
}

base64DataToImage (objects/functionsImages.php:1026) performs no content validation:

function base64DataToImage($imgBase64) {
    $img = $imgBase64;
    $img = str_replace('data:image/png;base64,', '', $img);
    $img = str_replace(' ', '+', $img);
    return base64_decode($img);
}

There is no call to getimagesizefromstring, imagecreatefromstring, or MIME detection. Arbitrary bytes up to post_max_size are accepted.

Why the global CSRF guard does not apply. objects/include_config.php (around line 314) only invokes autoCSRFGuard when the script filename matches *.json.php:

if (... $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] === 'POST' &&
    substr($baseName, -9) === '.json.php') {
    autoCSRFGuard($baseName, $_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME']);
}

userSavePhoto.php is missing the .json.php suffix, so neither autoCSRFGuard nor forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest runs. There is no explicit call to any of these in the file (verified by grep: no getCSRF, no forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest, no HTTP_ORIGIN, no HTTP_REFERER). Routing rewrites in .htaccess also expose this handler as /savePhoto.

Why the victim's cookie is sent cross-origin. objects/functionsPHP.php:227:

function _getCookieSameSiteValue($secure) {
    return $secure ? 'None' : 'Lax';
}

On HTTPS (the expected deployment), session cookies default to SameSite=None; Secure, which browsers attach to cross-site POSTs. A plain application/x-www-form-urlencoded form POST is a "simple request" under CORS rules and does not trigger a preflight, so the browser sends the POST and its cookie without the server having to opt in.

PoC

  1. Victim logs into the AVideo instance (e.g., https://victim.example.com). PHPSESSID is set with SameSite=None; Secure.
  2. Attacker hosts the following HTML on any domain:
<!doctype html>
<html><body>
<form id="f" action="https://victim.example.com/objects/userSavePhoto.php" method="POST">
  <!-- Any bytes: here, 'HELLO WORLD' base64-encoded -->
  <input name="imgBase64" value="SEVMTE8gV09STEQ=">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit();</script>
</body></html>
  1. Victim visits the attacker page in the same browser. The form auto-submits. The browser sends the POST with the victim's session cookie.
  2. userSavePhoto.php passes the User::isLogged() check, decodes the base64, and writes the raw bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<VICTIM_USERS_ID>.png. It also calls $user->save(), User::deleteOGImage(), User::updateSessionInfo(), and clearCache(true).
  3. Fetching https://victim.example.com/videos/userPhoto/photo<VICTIM_USERS_ID>.png (the file is now the attacker's bytes — HELLO WORLD in this test case). The response is 200 OK and the body equals the submitted bytes.

Replace the imgBase64 payload with a valid PNG to make the defacement visually persuasive, or with up to ~6 MB of any bytes to force a large write.

Impact

  • Integrity — profile defacement of any logged-in user. One click lets an attacker replace a victim's profile photo with arbitrary bytes: offensive imagery, misleading branding, or a clone of another user's photo for impersonation. The file path is deterministic (photo<users_id>.png), so the attacker can later direct others to the overwritten URL.
  • Availability — global cache thrash. Every successful forged request calls clearCache(true), invalidating application-wide caches. Repeatedly tricking logged-in users into visiting the attacker page (e.g., by including the payload as a hidden iframe on a popular site) produces sustained cache invalidation.
  • Availability — disk pressure. With no size cap beyond PHP's post_max_size (default 8 MB → ~6 MB after base64 decode), each forged submission writes a multi-megabyte file. Across many victims this enables distributed disk exhaustion.
  • No confidentiality impact and no code execution (files are served with Content-Type: image/png based on extension, so SVG-with-script payloads are not interpreted).
  • Related endpoints. objects/userSaveBackground.php exhibits the same pattern (same base64DataToImage sink, same lack of CSRF/Origin/MIME checks) and is exploitable identically; fix should be applied consistently.

Recommended Fix

Apply the existing same-origin guard that protects the *.json.php endpoints and add content validation. In objects/userSavePhoto.php, immediately after the login check:

require_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/functionsSecurity.php';
forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest('userSavePhoto');

$raw = $_POST['imgBase64'] ?? '';
if (strlen($raw) > 2 * 1024 * 1024) { // ~1.5 MB decoded cap
    $obj->msg = __('Image too large');
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
$fileData = base64DataToImage($raw);
if ($fileData === false || $fileData === '' || @imagecreatefromstring($fileData) === false) {
    $obj->msg = __('Invalid image');
    die(json_encode($obj));
}

The longer-term fix is to broaden the global guard in objects/include_config.php so that autoCSRFGuard covers every authenticated POST handler, not only those whose filenames end in .json.php — the current suffix-based gating is a footgun that silently excludes legacy endpoints like userSavePhoto.php and userSaveBackground.php. Also consider moving the clearCache(true) call inside the if ($bytes) branch so that zero-byte writes do not invalidate the global cache.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 29.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor