Skip to content

GHSA-hwj7-frgj-7829 CVE-2023-1537 GO-2023-1659

Answer vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

Critical Go
Severity
9.8 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.84%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.78% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-294 Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
Fix
1.0.6
Upgrade github.com/answerdev/answer to this version or later

Description

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in GitHub repository answerdev/answer prior to 1.0.6.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/answerdev/answer
< 1.0.6
1.0.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/answerdev/answer Go → 1.0.6

go
go get github.com/answerdev/answer@v1.0.6 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Utilize some sequence or time stamping functionality along with a checksum which takes this into account in order to ensure that messages can be parsed only once.
  • Architecture and Design: Since any attacker who can listen to traffic can see sequence numbers, it is necessary to sign messages with some kind of cryptography to ensure that sequence numbers are not simply doctored along with content.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-pj2h-85jq-g5vg
Answer Missing Authentication for Critical Function
High Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-52h8-c876-989c
Answer has Race Condition within a Thread
Medium Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-ggcf-hwxp-rc77
Answer Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability
High Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-j63x-f657-2m9g
Answer has Weak Password Requirements
High Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-v9vc-7x69-c2x8
Answer Missing Authorization vulnerability
Medium Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-qmqw-r4x6-3w2q
Answer Missing Authorization vulnerability
Low Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-j97g-77fj-9c4p
Answer vulnerable to account takeover because password reset links do not expire
High Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
GHSA-65v8-6pvw-jwvq
Answer vulnerable to Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
Medium Also affects github.com/answerdev/answer
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor