Skip to content

GHSA-hpgw-ww76-c68r CVE-2026-46362

phpMyFAQ has an Authorization Bypass in All Admin Pages Due to Non-Terminating Permission Check

High Packagist
Severity
7.1 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.11% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission() catches the ForbiddenException thrown when a user lacks a specific permission, sends a "forbidden" HTML page via $response->send(), but does not terminate execution. The calling controller method continues to execute, fetches protected data, renders the full template, and returns it as a Response. The final $response->send() in admin/index.php outputs the protected page content after the forbidden page, leaking all permission-protected admin data to any authenticated admin user regardless of their actual permissions.

Details

The parent class AbstractController::userHasPermission() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.php:317-327) correctly enforces authorization by throwing a ForbiddenException when the user lacks the required permission. This exception would normally propagate to Symfony's HttpKernel exception handler, which would return an error response and prevent the controller from continuing.

However, AbstractAdministrationController overrides this method at line 390-399:

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();  // Outputs HTML but does NOT terminate execution
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        // Only logs, no response, no termination
    }
}

The critical flaw: after $response->send() at line 396, there is no exit(), die(), return, or re-throw. PHP execution continues normally into the calling controller method.

For example, in AdminLogController::index() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AdminLogController.php:45-83):

public function index(Request $request): Response
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::STATISTICS_ADMINLOG);
    // ^^^ If user lacks permission: forbidden page is echoed, but execution continues

    // ... all of this still executes:
    $loggingData = $this->adminLog->getAll();  // Fetches ALL admin log entries
    // ...
    return $this->render('@admin/statistics/admin-log.twig', [
        // ... full admin log data including IPs, usernames, actions
        'loggingData' => $currentItems,
    ]);
}

The entry point admin/index.php then calls $response->send() on the returned Response, appending the full protected page to the already-sent forbidden page in the HTTP response body.

The second catch block (line 397-398) for generic Exception is even worse — it only logs the error without sending any response or terminating, so the protected page renders with no forbidden notice at all.

58 admin controllers extend AbstractAdministrationController and call userHasPermission(), meaning every permission-protected admin page is affected. This includes:

  • Admin logs (user IPs, actions, usernames)
  • User management (user data, permissions)
  • System information (server configuration, PHP info)
  • Configuration pages (all application settings)
  • Backup pages
  • All other admin functionality

PoC

  1. Create a test admin user with minimal permissions (e.g., only FAQ editing, no statistics access):

  2. Authenticate as the limited admin user and request a permission-protected page:

# Get admin session cookies by logging in
curl -c cookies.txt -d 'faqusername=limited_admin&faqpassword=password&pmf-csrf-token=TOKEN' \
  'https://TARGET/admin/?action=login'

# Access admin log page (requires STATISTICS_ADMINLOG permission)
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/statistics/admin-log' | tee response.html

# The response contains BOTH the forbidden page HTML AND the full admin log:
grep -c 'You are not allowed' response.html    # 1 — forbidden page was sent
grep -c 'loggingData\|ad_adminlog_ip' response.html  # matches — admin log data also present

# Access system information (requires CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission)  
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/system-information' | tee sysinfo.html
# Contains PHP version, extensions, database info, server configuration
  1. The HTTP response body contains the forbidden page HTML followed by the full protected page HTML, including all sensitive data.

Impact

Any authenticated admin user — even one with zero administrative permissions beyond basic login — can access every permission-protected admin page by simply requesting its URL. The permission check sends a forbidden page but does not stop execution, so the protected content is always appended to the response.

Exposed data includes:

  • Admin logs: All admin users' IP addresses, actions, and timestamps
  • User management: User accounts, email addresses, permissions
  • System information: PHP configuration, database details, server paths
  • Configuration: All application settings including security-sensitive values
  • Backups: Database export functionality

This effectively renders the entire admin permission system non-functional for the 58 page controllers using AbstractAdministrationController.

Recommended Fix

Add return after sending the forbidden response, and re-throw for the generic Exception case:

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();
        exit;  // Terminate execution to prevent controller from continuing
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        throw $exception;  // Re-throw to prevent controller from continuing
    }
}

A cleaner architectural fix would be to not swallow the exception at all, and instead let it propagate to the Symfony HttpKernel exception handler (which already handles ForbiddenException via WebExceptionListener):

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    // Simply delegate to parent — let ForbiddenException propagate
    // to the WebExceptionListener which renders the appropriate error page
    parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
}

Or remove the override entirely, since the WebExceptionListener registered in the Kernel already handles exception-to-response conversion.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
< 4.1.2
4.1.2
thorsten/phpmyfaq
< 4.1.2
4.1.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.2

composer
composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

thorsten/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.2

composer
composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 7.1

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp
phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pgwp-vc7q-cvj3
phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w
phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration
Medium Also affects thorsten/phpmyfaq
GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5
phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-88g4-74f3-63x9
phpMyFAQ has Potential Authenticated Path Traversal in PDF Export
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pg62-f8g4-4wqh
phpMyFAQ privilege escalation: GroupController::updatePermissions lets a GROUP_EDIT admin grant rights they do not hold
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-985r-q3qp-299h
phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor