GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5 CVE-2026-56737
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
- Severity
- 8.1 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.53%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.64% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-287 Improper Authentication
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Summary
The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid
6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior
successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker
can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit
code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an
authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
Details
src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:
#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
$userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);
if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
$result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId);
if ($result) {
$this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked
return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
}
}
// ...
}
twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):
public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool
{
$this->setLoggedIn(true);
$this->updateSessionId(true);
$this->saveToSession();
$this->setSuccess(true);
return true;
}
There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the
/check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a
2fa_pending_user_id session value set only after the password is validated
(src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend
omission is a regression, not an intended design.
validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret,
so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of
every 2FA-enabled account:
public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool
{
if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; }
$this->currentUser->getUserById($userId);
$secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret');
if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false
return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only
}
Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default
(Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to
strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.
PoC
Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows
or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
# No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check.
# Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session.
for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do
curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \
-X POST "https://target/check" \
--data-urlencode "user-id=1" \
--data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \
-o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \
| grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break
done
# A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used).
If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all.
Impact
Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq | >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 |
4.1.6 |
| thorsten/phpmyfaq | >= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6 |
4.1.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.6
- composer
composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6
thorsten/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.6
- composer
composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-287: Improper Authentication
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
- github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/410208b90f1d01534812ac5203d3e8d9c7bd591f
- github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/5097dff341fb01e93e8561e7261b3ae657df715a
- github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/6a69f6e2142fde722165c65b7e0a49f3176e87be
- github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/releases/tag/4.1.6
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion | High | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-pgwp-vc7q-cvj3 phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission | High | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration | Medium | Also affects thorsten/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5 phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content | Medium | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-88g4-74f3-63x9 phpMyFAQ has Potential Authenticated Path Traversal in PDF Export | Medium | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-pg62-f8g4-4wqh phpMyFAQ privilege escalation: GroupController::updatePermissions lets a GROUP_EDIT admin grant rights they do not hold | High | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-985r-q3qp-299h phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards | High | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
| GHSA-8c6h-7g6x-m5x4 phpMyFAQ: Missing userHasPermission() in 4 API write endpoints (CVE-2026-24421 Incomplete Fix) | Medium | Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor